Skip to main content
Log in

Low Cost, Low Dose, Oral, Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Protocol in Locally Advanced Borderline Oral Cancers—Feasibility Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A vast majority of oral cancer patients in developing countries present in an advanced stage with borderline resectable/inoperable stage to busy resource-constrained tertiary cancer centers. Conventional chemotherapy protocols are associated with issues like toxicity, tolerance, cost, and compliance. The present study was conducted to assess the feasibility of low-cost home-based chemotherapy options. Single-arm feasibility study was done in borderline resectable/inoperable oral cancer patients. Home-based oral neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisting of oral methotrexate 15 mg/m2 once a week and oral celecoxib 200 mg twice daily for 8 weeks was used. RECIST Criteria 1.1 was used to assess response to therapy. The study included 60 patients. The mean age was 51.98 years with male predominance (80%). Fifty-five patients adhered to the treatment; the compliance rate is 91.60%. Affordability (Rs 700 per month) and tolerance to therapy was 100%, and no grade III or IV toxicity was seen. Overall, 18 patients had stable disease (32.73%), partial response was seen in 15 patients (27.27%), and the disease progressed in 22 patients (40%). At the end of 8 weeks, 26 (43.3%) patients were deemed resectable. Neoadjuvant low cost, home-based metronomic chemotherapy using oral methotrexate and celecoxib seems to be a viable option in managing advanced oral cancer in resource-constrained setups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative Cancer Collaborators (2018) The burden of cancers and their variations across the states of India: the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990–2016 [published correction appears in Lancet Oncol. 2018 Oct 3]. Lancet Oncol 19(10):1289–1306. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30447-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pai PS, Vaidya AD, Prabhash K, Banavali SD (2013) Oral metronomic scheduling of anticancer therapy-based treatment compared to existing standard of care in locally advanced oral squamous cell cancers: a matched-pair analysis. Indian J Cancer 50(2):135–141. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-509X.117024

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Scharovsky OG, Mainetti LE, Rozados VR (2009) Metronomic chemotherapy: changing the paradigm that more is better. Curr Oncol 16(2):7–15. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.v16i2.420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kerbel RS, Kamen BA (2004) The anti-angiogenic basis of metronomic chemotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer 4(6):423–436. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1369

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Coelho KR (2012) Challenges of the oral cancer burden in India. J Cancer Epidemiol 2012:701932–701917. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/701932

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Goyal G (2016) Knowledge, attitude and practice of chewing gutka, areca nut, snuff and tobacco smoking among the young population in the Northern India Population. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 17(11):4813–481. Published 2016 Nov 1. https://doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2016.17.11.4813

  7. Shah S, Dave B, Shah R, Mehta TR, Dave R (2018) Socioeconomic and cultural impact of tobacco in India. J Family Med Prim Care 7(6):1173–1176. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_36_18

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Hashitani S, Urade M, Nishimura N, Maeda T, Takaoka K, Noguchi K, Sakurai K (2003) Apoptosis induction and enhancement of cytotoxicity of anticancer drugs by celecoxib, a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, in human head and neck carcinoma cell lines. Int J Oncol 23(3):665–672

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kerr DJ, Midgley R (2010) Can we treat cancer for a dollar a day? Guidelines for low-income countries. N Engl J Med 363(9):801–803. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1002812

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Smith TJ, Hillner BE (2011) Bending the cost curve in cancer care. N Engl J Med 364(21):2060–2065. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsb1013826

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Vishak S, Rangarajan B, Kekatpure VD (2015) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in oral cancers: selecting the right patients. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 36(3):148–153. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-5851.166716

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahesh Sultania.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sultania, M., Deo, S.V.S., Shukla, N.K. et al. Low Cost, Low Dose, Oral, Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Protocol in Locally Advanced Borderline Oral Cancers—Feasibility Study. Indian J Surg Oncol 12, 67–72 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-020-01247-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-020-01247-8

Keywords

Navigation