Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Island Nasolabial Flap for Tongue Reconstruction: Locoregional Flap of Choice and an Alternative to Free Flap for Tongue Cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reconstruction following excision for tongue cancer carries important functional consequences. Island nasolabial flap (NLF) is robust and oncologically safe and has a good functional outcome, identical to free flap reconstruction. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 11 tongue cancer patients operated between January 2019 and August 2019. Surgical resection and neck dissection followed by immediate reconstruction by island NLF were done. Post-operative functional outcome assessed using the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire. Age of patients ranged between 39 and 70 years. All patients had either T2 or T3 tongue cancer. No incidence of flap necrosis noted in any patient. On an average, all were discharged between 3rd and 5th post-operative days. Cosmetic and functional outcomes were satisfactory in all patients. Island nasolabial has an excellent reach and can reach any part of the oral cavity, even to the contralateral side and base of the tongue. It has an excellent post-operative tongue function, almost equivalent to free flap. Hence, it should be considered locoregional flap of choice for tongue reconstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vincet A et al (2019) Free-flap reconstruction of the tongue. Semin Plast Surg 33(1):38–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pers M (1967) Cheek flaps in partial rhinoplasty. Stand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1:37

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thiersch C (1868) Verschluss eines loches im harten gaumen durch die weichtheile der wange. Arch Heilkunde 9:159

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rosenthal W (1916) Verschluss traumatischer gaumendefekte durch weischteile des gesichts. Zentrabl Chir 43:596

    Google Scholar 

  5. Esser JF (1918) Deckung von gaumendefekten mittels geslielter naso-labialhautlappen. Deutsche Ztschr Chir 147:128–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wallace AF (1966) Esser’s skin flap for closing large palatal fistulae. Br J Plast Surg 19:322–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Georgiade N, Mladick R, Thorne F (1969) The nasolabial tunnel flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 43:463–466

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Elliott RA (1976) Use of nasolabial skin flap to cover intraoral defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 58:201–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Varghese BT, Sebastian P, Koshy CM, Thomas S, Cherian T, Ahmed I, Mohan PM (2001) Nasolabial flaps in oral reconstruction: an analysis of 224 cases. Br J Plast Surg 54(6):499–503

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mann R, Srinivasan B, Webb R, Webb A (2017) An unusual complication of nasolabial flap reconstruction. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 99(2):60–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lazaridou M, Vaxtsevanos K, Dimitrakopoulos I, Lazaridis N, Antoniades K (2016) Nasolabial pedicled compared with island flaps for intraoral reconstruction of oncological defects: complications, recovery of sensitivity, and assessment of quality of life. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 54(7):746–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. McConnel FM, Pauloski BR, Logemann JA, Rademaker AW, Colangelo L, Shedd D et al (1998) Functional results of primary closure vs. flaps in oropharyngeal reconstruction: a prospective study of speech and swallowing. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 124:625–630

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hara I, Gellrich NC, Düker J, Schön R, Nilius M, Fakler O, Schmelzeisen R, Ozeki S, Honda T (2003) Evaluation of swallowing function after intraoral soft tissue reconstruction with microvascular free flaps. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 32:593–599

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hsiao HT, Leu YS, Chang SH, Lee JT (2003) Swallowing function in patients who underwent hemiglossectomy: comparison of primary closure and free radial forearm flap reconstruction with videofluoroscopy. Ann Plast Surg 50:450–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Vikas Sharma

    Present address: Faculty Apartment, Dr RMLIMS, Flat number 806, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow, 226010, India

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgical Oncology, Dr RMLIMS, Lucknow, 226010, India

    Vikas Sharma

  2. Department of Surgery, ELMC&H, Lucknow, 226003, India

    Sandhya Pandey

  3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr RMLIMS, Lucknow, 226010, India

    Ajeet Kumar Gandhi, Madhup Rastogi, Rohini Sethi & Rahat Hadi

  4. Department of Surgical Oncology, Geetanjali Medical College & Hospital, Udaipur, 313002, India

    Arun Pandey

  5. Department of Pathology, Dr RMLIMS, Lucknow, 226010, India

    Nuzhat Hussain

Authors
  1. Vikas Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sandhya Pandey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ajeet Kumar Gandhi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Arun Pandey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Madhup Rastogi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Rohini Sethi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Rahat Hadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Nuzhat Hussain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vikas Sharma.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma, V., Pandey, S., Gandhi, A.K. et al. Island Nasolabial Flap for Tongue Reconstruction: Locoregional Flap of Choice and an Alternative to Free Flap for Tongue Cancer. Indian J Surg Oncol 12, 94–99 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-020-01214-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-020-01214-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation