Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Can Preoperative Ultrasonography and MRI Replace Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Management of Axilla in Early Breast Cancer—a Prospective Study from a Tertiary Cancer Center

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although SLNB is a less invasive procedure in detecting axillary lymph node metastases(ALNM) in early breast cancer; still, it carries some complications like lymphedema and in addition, performing SLNB requires surgical skills, technical knowledge, presence of facility like preoperative sentinel lymphoscintigraphy, and availability of hand-held gamma probe for intraoperative assessment. We calculated the relative diagnostic strength of preoperative axillary USG and MRI and compared with of SLNB for detection of ALNM in early breast cancer and assessed whether MRI and USG could accurately predict axillary LN status, potentially replacing SLNB. We evaluated 40 cases of clinically node-negative early breast cancer with preoperative axillary USG and MRI and subsequently subjected to SLNB. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of axillary USG were 62.5%, 96.88%, 88.33%, 91.18%, and 90% respectively (p value < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of MRI in detection of ALNM were 75%, 93.75%, 75%, 93.75%, and 90% (p value < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of combined USG and MRI in detection of ALNM were 87.5%,90.63%, 70%, 96.67%, and 90% respectively (p value < 0.001), which are comparable to previous study series. The diagnostic performance of combined approach of axillary USG and MRI is promising, as the NPV of combined USG and MRI is approaching the NPV of the SLNB in detecting ALNM. Based on above findings, if axillary LNs are found nonsuspicious in preoperative axillary USG and MRI, further axillary dissection may be avoided, and if found suspicious, then ALND may be directly proceeded avoiding SLNB in between.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mansel RE, Fallowfield L, Kissin M, England D et al (2006) Randomized multicenter trial of sentinel node biopsy versus standard axillary treatment in operable breast cancer: the ALMANAC trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 98(9):599–609

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fisher B, Jeong JH, Anderson S, Bryant J, Fisher ER, Wolmark N (2002) Twenty-five-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing radical mastectomy, total mastectomy, and total mastectomy followed by irradiation. N Engl J Med 347(8):567–575

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Giuliano AE, Kirgan DM, Guenther JM, Morton DL (1994) Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg 220(3):391–401

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, Brown AM, Harlow SP, Ashikaga T, Weaver DL, Miller BJ, Jalovec LM, Frazier TG, Noyes RD, Robidoux A, Scarth HM, Mammolito DM, McCready D, Mamounas EP, Costantino JP, Wolmark N, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (2007) Technical outcomes of sentinel-lymph-node resection and conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer: results from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 8(10):881–888

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shah-Khan M, Boughey JC (2012) Evolution of axillary nodal staging in breast cancer: clinical implications of the ACOSOG Z0011 trial. Cancer Control 19:267–276

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yeo B, Turner NC, Jones A (2014) An update on the medical management of breast cancer. Bmj. 348:g3608

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Goyal A, Dodwell DP (2015) POSNOC: a randomised trial looking at axillary treatment in women with one or two sentinel nodes with macrometastases. Clin Oncol 27(12):692–695

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. de Boniface J, Frisell J, Andersson Y et al (2017) Survival and axillary recurrence following sentinel node-positive breast cancer without completion axillary lymph node dissection: the randomized controlled SENOMAC trial. BMC Cancer 17(1):379

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Tinterri C, Canavese G, Bruzzi P, Dozin B (2016) SINODAR ONE, an ongoing randomized clinical trial to assess the role of axillary surgery in breast cancer patients with one or two macrometastatic sentinel nodes. Breast 30:197–200

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Van Roozendaal LM, de Wilt JH, Van Dalen T et al (2015) The value of completion axillary treatment in sentinel node positive breast cancer patients undergoing a mastectomy: a Dutch randomized controlled multicentre trial (BOOG 2013–07). BMC Cancer 15(1):610

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Gentilini O, Veronesi U (2012) Abandoning sentinel lymph node biopsy in early breast cancer? A new trial in progress at the European Institute of Oncology of Milan (SOUND: sentinel node vs observation after axillary UltraSouND). Breast 21(5):678–681

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Peintinger F, Reitsamer R, Stranzl H, Ralph G (2003) Comparison of quality of life and arm complaints after axillary lymph node dissection vs sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer 89(4):648–652

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Fernández AG, Fraile M, Giménez N et al (2011) Use of axillary ultrasound, ultrasound-fine needle aspiration biopsy and magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative triage of breast cancer patients considered for sentinel node biopsy. Ultrasound Med Biol 37(1):16–22

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kvistad KA, Rydland J, Smethurst HB et al (2000) Axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer: preoperative detection with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Eur Radiol 10(9):1464–1471

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Park SH, Kim MJ, Park BW, Moon HJ, Kwak JY, Kim EK (2011) Impact of preoperative ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration of axillary lymph nodes on surgical management of primary breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 18(3):738–744

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Voogd AC, Coebergh JW, Van Driel OJ et al (2000) The risk of nodal metastases in breast cancer patients with clinically negative lymph nodes: a population-based analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 62(1):63–69

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. van Rijk MC, Teertstra HJ, Peterse JL, Nieweg et al (2006) Ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration cytology in the preoperative evaluation of melanoma patients eligible for sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 13(11):1511–1516

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Alvarez S, Añorbe E, Alcorta P, López F, Alonso I, Cortés J (2006) Role of sonography in the diagnosis of axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer: a systematic review. Am J Roentgenol 186(5):1342–1348

    Google Scholar 

  19. Harnan SE, Cooper KL, Meng Y, Ward SE, Fitzgerald P, Papaioannou D, Ingram C, Lorenz E, Wilkinson ID, Wyld L (2011) Magnetic resonance for assessment of axillary lymph node status in early breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 37(11):928–936

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Abe H, Schacht D, Kulkarni K, Shimauchi A, Yamaguchi K, Sennett CA, Jiang Y (2013) Accuracy of axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer patients: an observer-performance study comparison of MRI and ultrasound. Acad Radiol 20(11):1399–1404

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim T, Giuliano AE, Lyman GH (2006) Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast carcinoma. Cancer. 106(1):4–16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tanaka K, Yamamoto D, Kanematsu S, Okugawa H, Kamiyama Y (2006) A four node axillary sampling trial on breast cancer patients. Breast 15(2):203–209

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pesek S, Ashikaga T, Krag LE, Krag D (2012) The false-negative rate of sentinel node biopsy in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Surg 36(9):2239–2251

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Valente SA, Levine GM, Silverstein MJ, Rayhanabad JA, Weng-Grumley JG, Ji L, Holmes DR, Sposto R, Sener SF (2012) Accuracy of predicting axillary lymph node positivity by physical examination, mammography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Surg Oncol 19(6):1825–1830

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. An YS, Lee DH, Yoon JK et al (2014) Diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT, ultrasonography and MRI. Nuklearmedizin. 53(03):89–94

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashish Goel.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Panda, S.K., Goel, A., Nayak, V. et al. Can Preoperative Ultrasonography and MRI Replace Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Management of Axilla in Early Breast Cancer—a Prospective Study from a Tertiary Cancer Center. Indian J Surg Oncol 10, 483–488 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-019-00924-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-019-00924-7

Keywords

Navigation