Skip to main content

Impact of Length of Distal Margin on Outcomes Following Sphincter Preserving Surgery for Middle and Lower Third Rectal Cancers

Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology volume 10, pages 335–341 (2019)Cite this article

Abstract

Outcomes of sphincter preserving surgery for distal rectal cancers improve with clear circumferential resection and distal resection margin. However, the extent of distal resection margin after a complete mesorectal excision is often a cause for debate. We evaluated the outcome of middle and lower third rectal cancer patients undergoing sphincter preservation with variable distal resection margin at our center. Patients with biopsy-proven rectal adenocarcinoma within 10 cm from anal verge undergoing sphincter preserving resections were included. Patients with positive circumferential resection margin were excluded. Patients were divided into three groups based on the extent of distal resection margin (< 6 mm, 6–10 mm, > 10 mm) and oncological outcomes were compared. The median age of 242 patients was 50 years and 44 (18.2%) were high-grade tumors. Preoperative chemoradiation was used in 185 (75.2%) patients. Median distal resection margin was 20 mm. Patients in < 10 mm group had a significantly higher proportion of lower third (68.3% vs 39.8%, p = 0.004) and chemoradiation-treated tumors (85.4 vs 74.6%, p = 0.001). A significantly higher percentage required an intersphincteric resection in the < 10 mm group (53.7% vs 14.4%, p = 0.0001). Significantly higher percentage tumors were pT3 in > 10 mm group (45.3% vs. 31.7%) (p = 0.05). The median follow-up was 23 months. There was no difference in the overall, loco-regional, and distant recurrence rates between the three groups. A subcentimeter distal resection margin does not influence loco-regional or distant recurrence rates following sphincter preserving surgery for middle and lower third rectal adenocarcinoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. Nelson H, Petrelli N, Carlin A, Couture J, Fleshman J, Guillem J, Miedema B, Ota D, Sargent D, National Cancer Institute Expert Panel (2001) National Cancer Institute Expert Panel. Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:583–596

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lim SB, Kim JC (2013) Surgical issues in locally advanced rectal cancer treated by preoperative chemoradiotherapy. J Korean Surg Soc 84:1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Scott N, Jackson P, al-Jaberi T et al (1995) Total mesorectal excision and local recurrence: a study of tumour spread in the mesorectum distal to rectal cancer. Br J Surg 82:1031–1033

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cecil TD, Sexton R, Moran BJ, Heald RJ (2004) Total mesorectal excision results in low local recurrence rates in lymph node-positive rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1145–1149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pachler J, Wille-Jørgensen P (2012) Quality of life after rectal resection for cancer, with or without permanent colostomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:CD004323

    Google Scholar 

  6. Russell MM, Ganz PA, Lopa S, Yothers G, Ko CY, Arora A, Atkins JN, Bahary N, Soori GS, Robertson JM, Eakle J, Marchello BT, Wozniak TF, Beart RW Jr, Wolmark N (2015) Comparative effectiveness of sphincter-sparing surgery versus abdominoperineal resection in rectal cancer: patient-reported outcomes in National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project randomized trial R-04. Ann Surg 261:144–148

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Nash GM, Weiss A, Dasgupta R, Gonen M, Guillem JG, Wong WD (2010) Close distal margin and rectal cancer recurrence after sphincter-preserving rectal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1365–1373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hojo K (1986) Anastomotic recurrence after sphincter-saving resection for rectal cancer. Length of distal clearance of the bowel. Dis Colon Rectum 29:11–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kameda K, Furusawa M, Mori M, Sugimachi K (1990) Proposed distal margin for resection of rectal cancer. Jpn J Cancer Res 81:100–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Shirouzu K, Isomoto H, Kakegawa T (1995) Distal spread of rectal cancer and optimal distal margin of resection for sphincter-preserving surgery. Cancer 76:388–392

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vernava AM III, Moran M, Rothenberger DA et al (1992) A prospective evaluation of distal margins in carcinoma of the rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 175:333–336

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bujko K, Rutkowski A, Chang GJ, Michalski W, Chmielik E, Kusnierz J (2012) Is the1-cm rule of distal bowel resection margin in rectal Cancer based on clinical evidence? A systematic review. Indian J Surg Oncol 3:139–146

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kiran RP, Lian L, Lavery IC (2011) Does a subcentimeter distal resection margin adversely influence oncologic outcomes in patients with rectal cancer undergoing restorative proctectomy? Dis Colon Rectum 54:157–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuvshinoff B, Maghfoor I, Miedema B et al (2001) Distal margin requirements after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for distal rectal carcinomas: are < or = 1 cm distal margins sufficient? Ann Surg Oncol 8:163–169

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Andreola S, Leo E, Belli F et al (2001) Adenocarcinoma of the lower third of the rectum surgically treated with a < 10-MM distal clearance: preliminary results in 35 N0 patients. Ann Surg Oncol 8:611–615

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rutkowski A, Bujko K, Nowacki MP, Chmielik E, Nasierowska-Guttmejer A, Wojnar A, On Behalf of the Polish Colorectal Study Group (2008) Polish Colorectal Study Group. Distal bowel surgical margin shorter than 1 cm after preoperative radiation for rectal cancer: is it safe? Ann Surg Oncol 15:3124–3131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pricolo VE, Abodeely A, Resnick M (2010) Distal margins in radical resections for rectal cancer after chemoradiation therapy: how short is long enough? Dig Surg 27:185–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rullier E, Laurent C, Bretagnol F et al (2005) Sphincter-saving resection for all rectal carcinomas: the end of the 2-cm distal rule. Ann Surg 241:465–469

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Huh JW, Jung EJ, Park YA, Lee KY, Sohn SK (2008) Sphincter-preserving operations following preoperative chemoradiation: an alternative to abdominoperineal resection for lower rectal cancer? World J Surg 32:1116–1123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu R, Bai X, Qiu J, Guo D, Yan L, Wang G, Li X, Wang X (2014) Clinicopathological study of safe resectional margin in mid and low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 17:561–564

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim TG, Park W, Choi DH, Kim SH, Kim HC, Lee WY, Park JO, Park YS (2014) The adequacy of the distal resection margin after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Color Dis 16:O257–O263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mandard AM, Dalibard F, Mandard JC et al (1994) Pathologic assessment of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy of esophageal carcinoma. Clinicopathologic correlations. Cancer 73:2680–2686

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Patel UB, Taylor F, Blomqvist L, George C, Evans H, Tekkis P, Quirke P, Sebag-Montefiore D, Moran B, Heald R, Guthrie A, Bees N, Swift I, Pennert K, Brown G (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging-detected tumor response for locally advanced rectal cancer predicts survival outcomes: MERCURY experience. J Clin Oncol 29:3753–3760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W et al (2014) Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351:1731–1740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD (1982) The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 69:613–616

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Moore HG, Riedel E, Minsky BD, Saltz L, Paty P, Wong D, Cohen AM, Guillem JG (2003) Adequacy of 1-cm distal margin after restorative rectal cancer resection with sharp mesorectal excision and preoperative combined-modality therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 10:80–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Leo E, Belli F, Miceli R, Mariani L, Gallino GF, Battaglia L, Vannelli A, Andreola S (2009) Distal clearance margin of 1 cm or less: a safe distance in lower rectum cancer surgery. Int J Color Dis 24:317–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lim JW, Chew MH, Lim KH et al (2012) Close distal margins do not increase rectal cancer recurrence after sphincter-saving surgery without neoadjuvant therapy. Int J Color Dis 27:1285–1294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kang DW, Kwak HD, Sung NS, Yang IS, Baek SJ, Kwak JM, Kim J, Kim SH (2017) Oncologic outcomes in rectal cancer patients with a ≤1-cm distal resection margin. Int J Color Dis 32:325–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Barreto SG, Chaubal GN, Talole S, DeSouza A, Suradkar K, Gaikwad V, Goel M, Shrikhande SV (2014) Rectal cancer in young Indians--are these cancers different compared to their older counterparts? Indian J Gastroenterol 33:146–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mezhir JJ, Smith KD, Fichera A, Hart J, Posner MC, Hurst RD (2005) Presence of distal intramural spread after preoperative combined-modality therapy for adenocarcinoma of the rectum: what is now the appropriate distal resection margin? Surgery 138:658–663

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Song JH, Kim SH, Lee JH, Cho HM, Kim DY, Kim TH, Kim SY, Baek JY, Oh JH, Nam TK, Yoon MS, Jeong JU, Kim K, Chie EK, Jang HS, Kim JS, Kim JH, Kang KM (2016) Significance of histologic tumor grade in rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by curative surgery: a multi-institutional retrospective study. Radiother Oncol 118:387–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Søndenaa K, Kjellevold KH (1990) A prospective study of the length of the distal margin after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Int J Color Dis 5:103–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kobayashi H, Mochizuki H, Sugihara K, Morita T, Kotake K, Teramoto T, Kameoka S, Saito Y, Takahashi K, Hase K, Oya M, Maeda K, Hirai T, Kameyama M, Shirouzu K, Muto T (2007) Characteristics of recurrence and surveillance tools after curative resection for colorectal cancer: a multicenter study. Surgery 141:67–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Colorectal Service, Department of Surgical oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Ernest Borges Marg, Parel, Mumbai, 400 012, India

    Rahul Bhamre, Anup Tamankar, Ashwin Desouza & Avanish Saklani

  2. GI and HPB Service, Department of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Nagpur, India

    Abhishek Mitra

Authors
  1. Rahul Bhamre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abhishek Mitra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anup Tamankar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ashwin Desouza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Avanish Saklani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Avanish Saklani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhamre, R., Mitra, A., Tamankar, A. et al. Impact of Length of Distal Margin on Outcomes Following Sphincter Preserving Surgery for Middle and Lower Third Rectal Cancers. Indian J Surg Oncol 10, 335–341 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-019-00888-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-019-00888-8

Keywords

  • Adenocarcinoma
  • Rectum
  • Margin
  • Survival