Initiating a Robotic Thyroidectomy Program in India

Review Article
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

Robotic surgery has been successfully used for many surgical indications in head and neck surgery. Robotic thyroidectomy is getting accepted worldwide, but the majority of the literature is from South Korea. The purpose of the paper is to review and give a personal perspective on how a robotic thyroidectomy program was initiated in a tertiary care academic medical institution in India. Advantages of robotic approaches are the three-dimensional visualization, precision, dexterity, and surgeon ergonomics. Cost is an important concern. Training includes basic robotics skill training, cadaveric training, observership, and hands-on training. Sufficient preclinical and clinical training is essential before embarking onto the newer surgical modality. Surgeon credentialing, though institution dependent, has specific guidelines. Case selection is the key, especially in the initial learning curve. The authors prefer the retroauricular approach for robotic thyroidectomy, and our initial experience in the first ten cases of total thyroidectomy was encouraging.

Keywords

Robotic thyroidectomy Retroauricular approach Thyroid cancers Learning curve Remote access thyroidectomy 

Notes

Authors’ Contributions

Both the authors: design of the work; data acquisition, concept of the paper, literature review, analysis, interpretation, draft contribution, and approval of the final version to be published; agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Weinstein GS, O’Malley BW Jr, Snyder W, Sherman E, Quon H (2007) Transoral robotic surgery: radical tonsillectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133:1220–1226Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hamilton D, Paleri V (2017) Role of transoral robotic surgery in current head & neck practice. Surgeon 15:147–154CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    de Almeida JR, Li R, Magnuson JS, Smith RV, Smith RV, Moore E, Lawson G et al (2015) Oncologic outcomes after transoral robotic surgery: a multi-institutional study. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 141:1043–1051CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burton J, Wong R, Padhya T (2015) Robotic-assisted surgery in the head and neck. Cancer Control 22:331–334CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tateya I, Shiotani A, Satou Y, Tomifuji M, Morita S, Muto M, Ito J (2016) Transoral surgery for laryngopharyngeal cancer—the paradigm shift of the head and cancer treatment. Auris Nasus Larynx 43:21–32CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Byeon HK, Kim d H, Chang JW, Ban MJ, Park JH, Kim WS, Choi EC, Koh YW (2016) Comprehensive application of robotic retroauricular thyroidectomy: the evolution of robotic thyroidectomy. Laryngoscope 126:1952–1957CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Byeon HK, Holsinger FC, Tufano RP, Chung HJ, Kim WS, Koh YW, Choi EC (2014) Robotic total thyroidectomy with modified radical neck dissection via unilateral retroauricular approach. Ann Surg Oncol 21:3872–3875CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kim WS, Koh YW, Byeon HK, Park YM, Chung HJ, Kim ES, Lee EJ, Park SC, Choi EC (2014) Robot-assisted neck dissection via a transaxillary and retroauricular approach versus a conventional transcervical approach in papillary thyroid cancer with cervical lymph node metastases. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 24:367–372CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tae K, Song CM, Ji YB, Sung ES, Jeong JH, Kim DS (2016) Oncologic outcomes of robotic thyroidectomy: 5-year experience with propensity score matching. Surg Endosc 30:4785–4792CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sung ES, Ji YB, Song CM, Yun BR, Chung WS, Tae K (2016) Robotic thyroidectomy: comparison of a postauricular facelift approach with a gasless unilateral axillary approach. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 154:997–1004CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Song CM, Ji YB, Sung ES, Kim DS, Koo HR, Tae K (2016) Comparison of robotic versus conventional selective neck dissection and total thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid carcinoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 154:1005–1013CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lee CR, Chung WY (2015) Robotic surgery for thyroid disease. Minerva Chir 70:331–339PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Son H, Park S, Lee CR, Lee S, Kim JW, Kang SW, Jeong JJ, Nam KH, Chung WY, Park CS (2014) Factors contributing to surgical outcomes of transaxillary robotic thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid carcinoma. Surg Endosc 28:3134–3142CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Terris DJ, Singer MC, Seybt MW (2011) Robotic facelift thyroidectomy: II. clinical feasibility and safety. Laryngoscope 121:1636–1341CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Terris DJ, Singer MC, Seybt MW (2011) Robotic facelift thyroidectomy: patient selection and technical considerations. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 21:237–242CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lang BH, Wong CK, Tsang JS, Wong KP. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcomes between robotic-assisted thyroidectomy and non-robotic endoscopic thyroidectomy. J Surg Res 191:389–398Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lee J, Yun JH, Choi UJ, Kang SW, Jeong JJ, Chung WY (2012) Robotic versus endoscopic thyroidectomy for thyroid cancers: a multi-institutional analysis of early postoperative outcomes and surgical learning curves. J Oncol 2012:734541PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lee J, Yun JH, Nam KH, Soh EY, Chung WY (2011) The learning curve for robotic thyroidectomy: a multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol 18:226–232CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lee J, Chung WY (2013) Robotic thyroidectomy and neck dissection: past, present, and future. Cancer J 19:151–161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Oliveira CM, Nguyen HT, Ferraz AR, Watters K, Rosman B, Rahbar R (2012) Robotic surgery in otolaryngology and head and neck surgery: a review. Minim Invasive Surg 2012:286563.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/286563 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Perrier ND, Randolph GW, Inabnet WB, Marple BF, VanHeerden J, Kuppersmith RB (2010) Robotic thyroidectomy: a framework for new technology assessment and safe implementation. Thyroid 20:1327–1332CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Berber E, Bernet V, Fahey TJ 3rd, Kebebew E, Shaha A, Stack BC Jr, et al. (2016) American Thyroid Association Surgical Affairs Committee. American Thyroid Association Statement on Remote-Access Thyroid Surgery. Thyroid 26:331–337Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Inabnet WB 3rd (2012) Robotic thyroidectomy: must we drive a luxury sedan to arrive at our destination safely? Thyroid 22:988–990CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bomeli SR, Duke WS, Terris DJ (2015) Robotic facelift thyroid surgery. Gland Surg 4:403–409PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kiriakopoulos A, Linos D (2012) Gasless transaxillary robotic versus endoscopic thyroidectomy: exploring the frontiers of scarless thyroidectomy through a preliminary comparison study. Surg Endosc 26:2797–2801CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yoo H, Chae BJ, Park HS, Kim KH, Kim SH, Song BJ, Jung SS, Bae JS (2012) Comparison of surgical outcomes between endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy. J Surg Oncol 105:705–708CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cabot JC, Lee CR, Brunaud L, Kleiman DA, Chung WY, Fahey TJ III, Zarnegar R (2012) Robotic and endoscopic transaxillary thyroidectomies may be cost prohibitive when compared to standard cervical thyroidectomy: a cost analysis. Surgery 152:1016–1024CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Liu SY, Ng EK (2016) Robotic versus open thyroidectomy for differentiated thyroid cancer: an evidence-based review. Int J Endocrinol 4309087Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ericsson KA (2008) Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: a general overview. Acad Emerg Med 15:988–994CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Curry M, Malpani A, Li R, Tantillo T, Jog A, Blanco R, Ha PK, Califano J, Kumar R, Richmon J (2012) Objective assessment in residency-based training for transoral robotic surgery. Laryngoscope 122:2184–2192CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Herron DM, Marohn M (2008) SAGES-MIRA Robotic Surgery Consensus Group. A consensus document on robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 22:313–325CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bhatia P, Mohamed HE, Kadi A, Kandil E, Walvekar RR (2015) Remote access thyroid surgery. Gland Surg 4:376–387PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Alabbas H, Bu Ali D, Kandil E (2016) Robotic retroauricular thyroid surgery. Gland Surg 5:603–606CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Duncan DT, Castro MC, Gortmaker SL, Aldstadt J, Melly SJ, Bennett GG (2012) Racial differences in the built environment—body mass index relationship? A geospatial analysis of adolescents in urban neighbourhoods. Int J Health Geogr 11:11CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Chhabra P, Chhabra SK (2007) Distribution and determinants of body mass index of non-smoking adults in Delhi, India. J Health Popul Nutr 25:294–301PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lee Char SJ, Hills NK, Lo B, Kirkwood KS (2013) Informed consent for innovative surgery: a survey of patients and surgeons. Surgery 153:473–480CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lee DY, Lee KJ, Han WG, Oh KH, Cho JG, Baek SK, Kwon SY, Woo JS, Jung KY (2016) Comparison of transaxillary approach, retroauricular approach, and conventional open hemithyroidectomy: a prospective study at single institution. Surgery 159:524–531CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Association of Surgical Oncology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical SciencesAmrita UniversityKochiIndia

Personalised recommendations