Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Correlation of Transabdominal Ultrasonography and Cystoscopy in Follow-up of Patients with Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cystoscopy (CS) is considered to be the gold standard in the follow-up of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. However, CS is invasive, time-consuming, and expensive. On the other hand, modern sensitive transducers have improved the imaging of urinary tract rendering transabdominal ultrasonography (US) more effective in visualizing intraluminal filling defects in the bladder than it was in the past. Twenty-five follow-up patients of low-risk bladder cancer meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in study. Ultrasonography of the bladder was performed by a single senior radiologist, and subsequently, these patients were subjected to flexible cystoscopy under local anesthesia. Pain score was calculated for each of the cystoscopies done. Findings of transabdominal ultrasound of the bladder were correlated and compared with those of cystoscopy. Subjects with US and/or CS findings suggestive of recurrence underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) under general anesthesia and confirmation of the bladder carcinoma was achieved by the histopathological examination. Mean patient age was 60.56 years with range of 29 to 77 years. The sensitivity of modern ultrasonographic techniques was found to be 84.61% with specificity of 91.7% taking flexible cystoscopy as the gold standard for detection of recurrence. The accuracy of US was 88% with positive predictive value of 91.7% and negative predictive value of 84.61%. Technological evolution has improved the accuracy of ultrasonography in diagnosis of bladder carcinoma. It represents a valuable surveillance tool in selected sub group of low risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yamada T, Tsuchiya T, Kamei S (2006) Analysis of factors affecting recurrence and prognosis of superficial bladder cancer-study of 800 patients. Nippon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi 97:33–41

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Falke J, Witjes JA (2011) Contemporary management of low-risk bladder cancer. Nat Rev Urol 8:42–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shelley MD, Mason MD, Kynaston H (2010) Intravesical therapy for superficial bladder cancer: a systematic review of randomized trials and meta-analyses. Cancer Treat Rev 36:195–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fenlon H, Bell T, Ahari H, Hussain S (1997) Virtual cystoscopy. Early clinical experience. Radiology 250:272–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Abu-Yousef MM, Narayan AS, Franken EA, Brown RC (1984) Urinary bladder tumors studied by cystosonography. Part I: Detection Radiology 153:223–226

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Viswanath S, Zelhof B, Ho E, Sethia K, Mills R (2008) Is routine urine cytology useful in the haematuria clinic? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 9:153–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pegoraro C, Bondavalli C, Molani L (1997) Suprapubic bladder ultrasonography and urinary cytology: indications and limits in the follow-up of superficial bladder tumors. Arch Ital Urol Nefrol Androl 63:127–129

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vera-Donoso CD, Llopis B, Oliver F, Server G, Alonso M, Jimenez-Cruz JF (1990) Follow-up of superficial bladder cancer: how to spare cystoscopies? Eur Urol 17:17–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Almallah YZ, Rennie CD, Stone J, Lancashire MJR (2000) Urinary tract infection and patient satisfaction after flexible cystoscopy and urodynamic evaluation. Urology 56:37–39

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Konstantinos S, Hippocrates M, Marina P, Georgios P, Skolarikos A (2011) Accuracy of modern ultrasonographic techniques in the follow up of patients with superficial bladder carcinoma. Medical Ultrasonography 13:114–119

    Google Scholar 

  11. Babjuk M, Oosterlinck W, Sylvester R, Kaasinen E, Böhle A, Palou-Redorta J (2008) EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Eur Urol 54:303–314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gossel C, Knispel HH, Miller K, Klan R (1997) Is routine excretory urography necessary at first diagnosis of bladder carcinoma? J Urol 157:480–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Herranz-Amo F, Diez-Cordero JM, Verdu-Tartajo F, Bueno-Chomon G, Leal-Hernandez F, Bielsa-Carrillo A (1999) Need for intravenous urography in patients with primary transitional carcinoma of the bladder? Eur Urol 36:221–224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Malone PR, Weston-Underwood J, Aron PM, Wilkinson KW, Joseph AE, Riddle PR (1986) The use of transabdominal ultrasound in the detection of early bladder tumors. Br J Urol 58:520–522

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ozden E, Turgut AT, Turkolmez K, Resorlu B, Safak M (2007) Effect of bladder carcinoma location on detection rates by ultrasonography and computed tomography. Urology 69:889–892

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Itzchak Y, Singer D, Fischelovitch Y (1981) Ultrasonographic assessment of bladder tumors. I Tumor detection J Urol 26:31–33

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mariappan P, Smith G (2005) A surveillance schedule for G1Ta bladder cancer allowing efficient use of check cystoscopy and safe discharge at 5 years based on 25-year prospective database. J Urol 173:1008–1011

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cronan JJ, Simenoe JF, Pfister RC, Newhouse JH, Ferrucci JT Jr (1982) Cystosonography in the detection of bladder tumours: a prospective and retrospective study. J Ultrasound Med 1:237–241

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vallancien G, Veillon B, Charton M, Brisste JM (1986) Can transabdominal ultrasonography of the bladder replace cystoscopy in the follow up of superficial bladder tumours. J Urol 136:32–34

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rousseau MC, Straif K, Siemiatycki J (2005) IARC carcinogen update. Environ Health Perspect 113:A580–A581

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Boccon-Gibod I, Le Portz B, Godefroy D, Steg A (1985) Suprapubic ultrasonographic in follow up of superficial bladder tumours. Eur Urol 11:317–319

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Deborah S, Lillian JH, Farhang R, Peter BB, Harry H, Colin BB (2003) Adherence to surveillance among patients with superficial bladder cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:588–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Raitanen MP, Leppilahti M, Tuhkanen K, Forssel T, Nylund P, Tammela T et al (2001) Routine follow-up cystoscopy in detection of recurrence in patients being monitored for bladder cancer. Ann Chir Gynaecol 90:261–265

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Racioppi MA, Cappa EM, D'Agostino DA, Filianoti AL, Pugliese DA, Cadeddu CH et al (2013) Size of bladder cancers: correlation among different types of measurement. Urol Int 90:191–194

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahluwalia Puneet.

Ethics declarations

Sources of Support

Nil.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Puneet, A., Balagopal, N., Ginil, K. et al. Correlation of Transabdominal Ultrasonography and Cystoscopy in Follow-up of Patients with Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer. Indian J Surg Oncol 8, 548–553 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-017-0678-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-017-0678-6

Keywords

Navigation