Skip to main content
Log in

Uterine Sarcoma: The Indian Scenario

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Uterine sarcomas are rare, highly malignant tumours comprising < 1 % of all gynaecologic malignancies. To evaluate clinical presentation, histolopathologic pattern and outcome of uterine sarcomas presenting to a tertiary referral centre over an 8 year period (2004–2012). All histologically proven uterine sarcomas were retrospectively analysed. Clinical presentation, histology, treatment and outcome were analysed. Mean age was 42 years. Predominant histopathology was endometrial stromal sarcoma (n = 13); 9 were low grade, carcinosarcoma (n = 8) and leiomyosarcoma (n = 2). Fourteen patients had Stage I disease, 3 Stage II, 4 Stage III and 2 were Stage IV at presentation. Patients with disease confined to uterus received no adjuvant treatment (61 %). Of these, 11 were endometrial stromal sarcoma (7 were low grade) and 3 were carcinosarcomas. Four patients received adjuvant EBRT following hysterectomy (17 %). Two patients who presented with metastases received palliative chemotherapy. Mean follow-up period was 46 months (0–86 months). Eleven patients (47 %) developed disease recurrence. Seven (30 %) had local recurrence, while 4 (17 %) developed pulmonary metastases. A total of eight patients died and all deaths were within 1 year of recurrence. The only prognostic factor that correlated with survival was the stage of disease at diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sharma DN, Rath GK, Kumar S, Kumar L, Bhatla N, Gandhi AK, Hariprasad R (2011) Clinical outcome of patients with uterine sarcomas. J Cancer Res Ther 7:270–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Naaman Y, Shveiky D, Ben-Shachar I, Shushan A, Mejia-Gomez J, Benshushan A (2011) Uterine sarcoma: prognostic factors and treatment evaluation. IMAJ 13:76–79

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Durnali A, Tokluoğlu S, Özdemir N, Inanç M, Alkiş N, Zengin N, Sönmez ÖU, Küçüköner M (2012) Prognostic factors and treatment outcomes in 93 patients with uterine sarcoma from 4 centers in Turkey. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 13(5):1935–1941

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nassar OA, Abdul Moaty SB, Khalil e-SA, El-Taher MM, El Najjar M (2010) Outcome and prognostic factors of uterine sarcoma in 59 patients: single institutional results. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst 22(2):113–122

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Prat J (2009) FIGO staging for uterine sarcomas. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 104(3):177–178

  6. Shah JP, Bryant CS, Kumar S et al (2008) Lymphadenectomy and ovarian preservation in low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma. Obstet Gynecol 112:1102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wright JD, Seshan VE, Shah M et al (2008) The role of radiation in improving survival for early-stage carcinosarcoma and leiomyosarcoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(5):536.e1–536.e8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Puliyath G, Krishnan Nair M (2012) Endometrial stromal sarcoma: a review of the literature. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 33(1):1–6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. D’Angelo E, Prat J (2010) Uterine sarcomas: a review. Gynecol Oncol 116(1):131–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Naaman Y, Shveiky D, Ben-Shachar I, et al (2011) Uterine sarcoma: prognostic factors and treatment evaluation. IMAJ 13(2):76–79

  11. Barakat RR. Principles and practice of gynecological oncology

  12. Homesley HD, Filiaci V, Markman M, Gynecologic Oncology Group et al (2007) Phase III trial of ifosfamide with or without paclitaxel in advanced uterine carcinosarcoma: a gynecologic oncology group study. J Clin Oncol 25:526–531

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Anupama R, Kuriakose S et al (2013) Carcinosarcoma of the uterus—a single institution retrospective analysis of the management and outcome and a brief review of literature. Indian J Surg Oncol 4(3):222–228

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Sivakumari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sivakumari, S., Rajaraman, R. & Subbiah, S. Uterine Sarcoma: The Indian Scenario. Indian J Surg Oncol 6, 232–236 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-015-0433-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-015-0433-9

Keywords

Navigation