Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of Marginal Gap and Microleakage in Copy-Milled and Cad-Milled Zirconia Copings Bonded Using Light Cure and Chemical Cure Resin Bonding Systems

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society

Abstract

This in vitro study assessed the marginal gap and marginal microleakage in zirconia copings fabricated using two computer aided techniques- CAD milling and Copy milling and cemented to respective tooth preparations using two resin bonding systems, light cure and self-cure resin bonding systems. 32 extracted premolars were prepared to receive zirconia copings fabricated using CAD/CAM and Copy milling techniques. Once the copings were fabricated, the samples were evaluated for marginal fit prior to cementation through microscopic observation. Evaluation of marginal gap was done again after cementation, in order to incorporate the influence of the resin bonding system on the marginal microgap. The specimens were evaluated under the stereomicroscope for micro-leakage using commercial software. A comparative statistical analysis was done following data collection using Mann–Whitney U test, Wilcoxon test and chi-square test. The data collected regarding marginal gap was well within 120 µ, which is in accordance with previous studies. However, Copy milled specimens showed statistically lesser marginal gap when compared to CAD milled specimens. While comparing microleakage, it was observed that the microleakage in Copy milled specimens bonded with light cure resin bonded cement was statistically lesser than that of specimens cemented with chemical cure resin cement.(P = 0.003). This in vitro study concluded that Copy milling technique fabricated zirconia restorations with lesser marginal gap and microleakage score in comparison to CAD milled samples. Light cure resin bonding system also proved to be more effective option compared to self cure resin bonding systems. However, the limitations of this study should be taken into concern and further research should be aimed at a larger sample size to validate the results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Contrepois M, Soenen A, Bartela M, Laviole O (2013) Marginal adaptation of ceramic crowns: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 110(6):447–454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hamza TA, Ezzat HA, El-Hossary MM, Katamish HA, Shokry TE, Rosensteil SF (2013) Accuracy of ceramic restorations made with two CAD/CAM systems. J Prosthet Dent 109:83–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yuksel E, Zaimoglu A (2011) Influence of marginal fit and cement types on microleakage of all- ceramic crown systems. Braz Oral Res 25(3):261–266

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Martinez-Ruz F, Suarez MJ, Rivera B, Pradies G (2011) Evaluation of the absolute marginal discrepancy of zirconia based ceramic copings. J Prosthet Dent 105:108–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Albert FE, El-Mowafy OM (2004) Marginal adaptation and microleakage of Procera All Ceram crowns with four cements. Int J Prosthodont 17:529–535

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gu XH, Kern M (2003) Marginal discrepancies and leakage of all ceramic crowns: Influence of luting agents and ageing conditions. Int J Prosthodont 16:109–116

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Helvey GA (2007) Zirconia and computer aided design/CAM dentistry. Funct Aesthet Restor Dent 1(3):28–39

    Google Scholar 

  8. Baldissara P, Llukacej A, Ciocca L, Valandro FL, Scotti R (2010) Translucency of zirconia copings made with different CAD/CAM systems. J Prosthet Dent 104:6–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cekic-Nagas I, Eglimez F, Ergun G, Kaya BM (2013) Light transmittance of zirconia as a function of thickness and microhardness of resin cements under different thicknesses of zirconia. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 18(2):e212–e218

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Person A, Anderson M, Oden A, Sandborgh G (2006) A three dimensional evaluation of a laser scanner and a touch probe scanner. J Prosthet Dent 95:194–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jeong S, Kang DW (2001) Wolf C, Evaluation of marginal fidelity of Copy milled and CAD/CAM all ceramic crowns. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 39(3):243–249

    Google Scholar 

  12. Raigrodski AJ (2003) Clinical and Laboratory considerations for the use of CAD/CAM Y-TZP based restorations. Pract Proceed Aesthet Dent 15:469–476

    Google Scholar 

  13. Doyle MG et al (1990) The effect of tooth preparation design on the breaking strength of Dicor crowns: 2. Int J Prosthodont 3:241–248

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD (1989) Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 62:405–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA (1971) The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 131:107–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Baldissara et al (1998) Comparitive study of marginal microleakage of 6 cements in provisional crowns. J Prosthet Dent 80:417–422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rinke S, Huls A, Jahn L (1995) Marginal accuracy and fracture strength of conventional and copy milled all-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 8:303–310

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Palacios Johnson, Philips Raigrodski (2006) Retention of Zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement. JPD 96:104–114

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mirza RB, Tan KCB, Nicholls JI (2010) Evaluation of marginal fit of a zirconia ceramic computer- aided machined (CAM) crown system. J Prosthet Dent 104(4):216–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Badrawy El (1995) Chemical versus dual curing of resin inlay cements. J Prosthet Dent 73:15–24

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manoj Shetty.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shetty, M., Rajalakshmi, S. & Krishna Prasad, D. Comparison of Marginal Gap and Microleakage in Copy-Milled and Cad-Milled Zirconia Copings Bonded Using Light Cure and Chemical Cure Resin Bonding Systems. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 14 (Suppl 1), 37–45 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-014-0359-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-014-0359-x

Keywords

Navigation