The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 273–280 | Cite as

Archiving the Natural Dentition to Serve as Pre-extraction Record: Evaluating Perceptions Among Indian Prosthodontists

  • Gangadhar Shivappa Angadi
  • Pradnya V. KakodkarEmail author
  • Sonal G. Bahet
Original Article


This survey is undertaken to: (1) assess the perceptions of prosthodontist towards the concept of natural dentition archival (NDA); and (2) to obtain any further suggestions/recommendations regarding it. 616 prosthodontist across India participated in the study. Data was collected using a self- designed, self-administered, pilot tested, structured 10 item questionnaire. Results indicate that 32.1 % prosthodontists make use of pre-extraction records; 54.4 % seemed to give consideration to natural findings of the patient while denture fabrication; 86.7 % recommended patient aged 25–34 years to archive his/her natural dentition to serve as pre-extraction record; 92.2 % were willing to promote the NDA concept for their patients and 33.7 % thought that it is an extra burden. It was noted that postgraduate students (61.5 %) significantly gave more consideration to natural findings of the patient as compared to practicing prosthodontist and faculty (p < 0.001). Using, pre-extraction records was preferred by the prosthodontists from urban and periurban area as compared to those from rural area (p < 0.05). 67.8 % prosthodontists’ viewed NDA as ideal for denture construction which will result in greater patient satisfaction. However, 46 % prosthodontists have raised concerns like: storage and preservation of cast and records being tedious, extra time needed and patient motivation an added burden. 54 % recommended that NDA concept can be introduced and emphasized in the prosthodontic curriculum, so that the dental students learn and promote it to their future patients. Overall, the perception towards NDA is favourable and the prosthodontist needs to be motivated to utilize this concept.


Archiving Indian prosthodontist Natural dentition Esthetics Edentulousness 



The authors wish to thank the prosthodontist who participated in the survey. Also, Thanks to Dr.Lokesh Khurana for editing the paper in English language.


  1. 1.
    Akarslan ZZ, Sadik B, Erten H, Karabulut E (2009) Dental esthetic satisfaction, received and desired dental treatments for improvement of esthetics. Indian J Dent Res 20:195–200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stockheimer C, Waliszewski MP (2012) A survey of dentulous and edentulous patient preference among different denture esthetic concepts. J Esthet Restor Dent 24:112–124. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2011.00449.x Epub 2011 Jun 10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Quinn DM, Yemm R, Ianetta RV, Lyon FF, McTear J (1986) A practical form of pre-extraction records for construction of complete dentures. Br Dent J 160:166–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Turner LC (1970) The profile tracer: method for obtaining accurate pre-extraction records. J San Antonio Dent Soc 25:13PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Smith DE (1971) The reliability of pre-extraction records for complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 25:592–608PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sellen PN, Jagger DC, Harrison A (1999) Methods used to select artificial anterior teeth for the edentulous patient: a historical overview. Int J Prosthodont 12:51–58PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Crabtree DG, Ward JE, McCasland JP (1981) A preextraction profile record. J Prosthet Dent 45:479–483PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sudhakara V Maller, Karthik KS, Udita S Maller (2010) A review on diagnosis and treatment planning for completely edentulous patients. JIADS 1:15–21. Available from (Accessed on 26 August 2013)
  9. 9.
    Bissasu M (2004) Pre-extraction records for complete denture fabrication: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 91:55–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Silverman MM (1955) Pre-extraction records to avoid premature aging of the denture patient. J Prosthet Dent 5:465–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Asala Safa’a, Al-Shehrib Sharifa A, Rashad Hoda MA (2011) Canine location in different maxillomandibular relationships in Egyptians and Saudis. Saudi Dent J 23:37–42. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2010.09.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Srivastava Rajeev, Choukse Vivek (2011) Characterization of complete denture. Int J Dent Clin 3:56–59Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Khalil al Ali (2009) Current concepts of selecting teeth for complete dentures among dentists in riyadh, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan. Oral Dent J 29:177–180Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    WHO (1997) Oral health surveys, basic methods. Design of a basic oral health survey, 4th edn. WHO, Geneva, p 7Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marunick MT, Chamberlain BB, Robinson CA (1983) Denture aesthetics: an evaluation of laymen’s preferences. J Oral Rehabil 10:399–406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Singh BP, Pradhan KN, Tripathi A, Tua R, Tripathi S (2012) Effect of sociodemographic variables on complete denture satisfaction. J Adv Prosthodont 4:43–51. doi: 10.4047/jap.2012.4.1.43 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Isa ZM, Tawfiq OF, Noor NM, Shamsudheen MI, Rijal OM (2010) Regression methods to investigate the relationship between facial measurements and widths of the maxillary anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 103:182–188. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60028-5 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Smith BJ (1975) The value of the nose width as an esthetic guide in Prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 34:562–573PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gomes VL, Gonçalves LC, do Prado CL, Junior IL, de Lima Lucas B (2006) Correlation between facial measurements and the mesiodistal width of the maxillary anterior teeth. J Esthet Restor Dent 18:196–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ahuja NK (2011) Demographics and current scenario with respect to dentists, dental institutions and dental practices in India. Indian J Dent Sci 3:8–11Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Electronic Health Record. Available from (Accessed on 26 August 2013)
  22. 22.
    Maestro 3D. Avaialble from (Accessed on 26 August 2013)
  23. 23.
    Charangowda BK (2010) Dental records: an overview. J Forensic Dent Sci 2:5–10. doi: 10.4103/0974-2948.71050 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Delrose DC, Steinberg RW (2000) The clinical significance of the digital patient record. JADA 131:57S–60SPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Prosthodontic Society 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gangadhar Shivappa Angadi
    • 1
  • Pradnya V. Kakodkar
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Sonal G. Bahet
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Prosthodontics, Rural Dental CollegePravara Institute of Medical SciencesLoniIndia
  2. 2.Medilinkers Research ConsultancyPuneIndia
  3. 3.PuneIndia

Personalised recommendations