Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Use of Implants to Improve Removable Partial Denture Function

  • Clinical Report
  • Published:
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society

Abstract

The oral rehabilitation with conventional removable partial dentures in Kennedy class I patients allows continuous bone resorption, dislodgment of the prosthesis during the mastication caused by the resilience of the mucosa, and rotation of the prosthesis. Thus, the associations of distal implants become an attractive modality of treatment for these patients. This case report presented an association of removable partial dentures, milled crowns and osseointegrated implants to rehabilitate a partial edentulous patient. A removable partial denture associated with implants and metal-ceramic milled crowns can offer excellent esthetics, and will improve function and biomechanics, at a reduced cost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

References

  1. Douglass CW, Watson AJ (2002) Future needs for fixed and removable partial dentures in the United States. J Prosthet Dent 87:9–14. doi:10.1067/mpr.2002.121204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kelly M, Steele J, Nuttal N (2000) Adult dental health survey–oral health in the United Kingdom 1998. National Statistics Public Inquiry Service, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Soikkonen K, Ainamo A, Xie Q (1996) Height of the residual ridge and radiographic appearance of bony structure in the jaws of clinically edentulous elderly people. J Oral Rehabilit 23:470–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nickenig HJ, Schäfer C, Spiekermann H (2006) Survival and complication rates of combined tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures (FPDs). Clin Oral Implant Res 17:506–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Akaça K, Uysal S, Çehreli MC (2006) Implant–tooth-supported fixed partial prostheses: correlations between in vivo occlusal bite forces and marginal bone reactions. Clin Oral Implant Res 17:331–336. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01169.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chee WW, Mordohai N (2010) Tooth-to-implant connection: a systematic review of the literature and a case report utilizing a new connection design. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 12:122–133. doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00144.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Abduo J (2011) An innovative prostheses design for rehabilitation of severely mutilated dentition: a case report. J Adv Prosthodont 3:37–42. doi:10.4047/jap.2011.3.1.37

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lang NP, Pjetursson BE, Tan K, Bragger U, Egger M, Zwahlen M (2004) A systematic review of survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years II. Combined tooth–implant-supported FPDs. Clin Oral Implant Res 15:643–653. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01118.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ben-Ur Z, Aviv I, Maharshak B (1991) Factors affecting displacement of free-end saddle removable partial dentures. Quintessence Int 22:23–27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mijiritsky E (2007) Implants in conjunction with removable partial dentures: a literature review. Implant Dent 16(2):146–151. doi:10.1097/ID.0b013e3180500b2c

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ohkubo C, Kurihara D, Shimpo H, Suzuki Y, Kokubo Y†, Hosoi Y (2007) Effect of implant support on distal extension removable partial dentures: in vitro assessment. Oral Rehabilit 34:52–56. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01641.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mijiritsky E, Ormianer Z, Klinger A, Mardinger O (2005) Use of dental implants to improve unfavorable removable partial denture design. Compend Contin Educ Dent 26:744–746

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mijiritsky E, Karas S (2004) Removable partial denture desing involving teeth and implants as an alternative to unsuccessful fixed implant therapy: a case report. Implant Dent 13:218–220. doi:10.1097/01.id.0000136919.13387.94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Asvanund C, Morgano SM (2004) Restoration of unfavorably positioned implants for a partially edentulous patient by using an overdenture retained with milled bar and attachments: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 91:6–10. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.09.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jivraj SA, Chee WWL (2005) Use of a removable partial denture in the management of chronic screw loosening. J Prosthet Dent 93:13–16. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.10.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pesun IJ (1997) Intrusion of teeth in the combination implant-to-natural-tooth fixed partial denture: a review of the theories. J Prosthodont 6:268–277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pjetursson BE, Bragger U, Lang N, Zwahlen M (2007) Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs). Clin Oral Implant Res 18(Suppl. 3):97–113. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01439.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rieder CE, Parel SM (1993) A survey of natural tooth abutment intrusion with implant-connected fixed partial dentures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 13:335–347

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schlumberger TL, Bowley JF, Maze GI (1998) Intrusion phenomenon in combination tooth-implant restorations: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 80:199–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bassi F (2009) Comparing overdenture therapies with teeth and implant abutments. Int J Prosthodont 22:527–528

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Senna PM, Silva-Neto JP, Sanchez-Ayala A, Sotto-Maior BS (2011) Implants to improve removable partial denture retention. Dent Today 30:118

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Voller R (2008) Removable prosthetics: clinical indications and treatment principles. Dent Today 27(1):94–98

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mitrani R, Brudvik JS, Phillips KM (2003) Posterior implants for distal extension removable prostheses: a retrospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 23:353–359

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ohkubo C, Kobayashi M, Suzuki Y, Hosoi T (2008) Effect of implant support on distal-extension removable partial dentures: in vivo assessment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 23:1095–1101

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chaiyabutr Y, Brudvik JS (2008) Removable partial denture design using milled abutment surfaces and minimal soft tissue coverage for periodontally compromised teeth: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 99:263–266. doi:10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60058-X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Brudvik JS, Shor A (2004) The milled surface as a precision attachment. Dent Clin North Am 48:685–708. doi:10.1016/j.cden.2004.03.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wolf K, Ludwig K, Hartfil H, Kern M (2009) Analysis of retention and wear of ball attachments. Quintessence Int 40:405–412

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Dr. Lourdes Servían, specialist in restorative process, Uningá, University of Maringá/Bauru - SP, Brazil for her assistance in the oral rehabilitation.

Disclosure

All authors affirm that they do not have any financial interest in the products mentioned and have not received any remuneration for this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Altair A. Del Bel Cury.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pimentel, M.J., Arréllaga, J.P., Bacchi, A. et al. The Use of Implants to Improve Removable Partial Denture Function. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 14 (Suppl 1), 243–247 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-013-0307-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-013-0307-1

Keywords

Navigation