Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of the Effect of Different Ceramic Alloys and Porcelain Systems upon the Color of Metal–Ceramic Restorations: An In Vitro Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society

Abstract

The exact replication of natural tooth color in a metal ceramic restoration is a challenging fact as its affected by enumerable factors. Research revealing the influence of base metal alloys with different porcelain systems on the color of the restorations have shown minimal interest. The aim of the study was to evaluate the optical influence of different alloys (mainly base metal) and ceramic systems affecting the final color of metal–ceramic restorations. Four commercial ceramic alloys, two Ni–Cr, one Co–Cr and a high-noble alloy were combined with two porcelains in metal–ceramic specimens with a standardized thickness of layers. Ten disc-shaped specimens were prepared for each alloy/porcelain combination. High-noble was used as control group. Only opaque and dentin layers were applied. The specimens were analysed with Spectrophotometer, and data were obtained in the CIELAB color system. The recorded data were analysed with a one-way ANOVA and multiple range test by tukey—HSD procedure to identify the significant groups at 5 % level. The final color of the metal–ceramic specimens were significantly affected by both type of the alloy and the porcelain systems used (P < 0.0001). The Co-Cr alloy-porcelain combination produced least color difference when compared with the high-noble control group. There was significant difference (P < 0.0001) between both the brands of Ni–Cr alloy–porcelain systems. For all the alloy-porcelain combinations VMK 95 porcelain showed minimum color difference compared to the d-SIGN porcelain group. Conclusion: The final color of metal ceramic specimens was influenced both from the type of base metal alloy substructure and from the type of overlying porcelain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Seghi RR, Johnston WM, O’Brien WJ (1986) Spectrophotometric analysis of color differences between porcelain systems. J Prosthet Dent 56(1):35–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tung FF, Goldstein GR, Jang S, Hittelman E (2002) The repeatability of an intra-oral dental colorimeter. J Prosthet Dent 88(6):585–590

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Douglas RD, Przybylska M (1999) Predicting porcelain thickness required for dental shade matches. J Prosthet Dent 82(2):143–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stavridakis MM, Papazoglou E, Seghi RR, Johnston WM, Brantley WA (2004) Effect of different high palladium metal-ceramic alloys on the color of opaque and dentin porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 92(2):170–178

    Google Scholar 

  5. Preston JD (1985) Current status of shade selection and color matching. Quintessence Int 16(1):47–58

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Miller LL (1993) Shade matching. J Esthet Dent 5(4):143–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Barghi N, Richardson JT (1978) A study of various factors influencing shade of bonded porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 39(3):282–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Barghi N (1982) Color and glaze: effect of repeated firings. J Prosthet Dent 47(4):393–395

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jorgenson MW, Good Kind RJ (1979) Spectrophotometric study of five porcelain shades relative to the dimension of color, porcelain thickness, and repeated firings. J Prothet Dent 42(1):96–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brewer JD, DA Akersck G, Scrensen SE (1985) Spectrophotometric analysis of the influence of metal substrates on the color of metal–ceramic restorations. J Dent Res 64(1):74–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jacobs SH, Good Acre CJ, Moore BK, Dykema RW (1987) Effect of porcelain thickness and type of metal–ceramic alloy on color. J Prosthet Dent 57(2):138–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lund PS, Piotrowski TJ (1992) Color changes of porcelain surface colorants resulting from firing. Int J Prosthodont 5(1):22–27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Crispin BJ, Seghi RR, Globe H (1991) Effect of different metal ceramic alloys on the color of opaque and dentin porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 65(3):351–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Crispin BJ, Okamolosk GH (1991) Effect of porcelain crown substructure on visually perceivable value. J Prosthet Dent 66(2):209–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Barghi N, Lorenzana RE (1982) Optimum thickness of opaque and body porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 48(4):429–431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Groh CL, O’Brien WJ, Boenke KM (1992) Difference in color between fired porcelain and shade guides. Int J Prosthodont 5(6):510–514

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. O’Brien WJ, Boenke KM, Groh CL (1991) Coverage errors of two shade guides. Int J Prosthodont 4(1):45–50

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Paravina RD, Powers JM, Fay RM (2002) Color comparison of two shade guide. Int J Prosthodont 15(1):73–78

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Barghi N, Pedreo JAE, Bosch RR (1985) Effects of batch variation on shade of dental porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 54(5):625–627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bertolloti RL (2002) Alloys for porcelain fused to metal restorations. In: O’Brien W (ed) Dental materials and their selection, 3rd edn. Quintessence, Chicago, pp 200–209

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fanderlik L (1983) Glass science and technology: 5 optical properties of glass. Elsevier, St. Louis, pp 320–330

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yamamoto M (1985) Metal ceramics: principles and methods of Makoto Yamamoto. Quintessence, Chicago, pp 483–494

    Google Scholar 

  23. Culpepper WD (1970) A comparative study of shade—matching procedure. J Prosthet Dent 24(2):166–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Davison SP, Myslinski NR (1990) Shade selection by color vision—defective dental personnel. J Prosthet Dent 63(1):97–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sharma A (1985) Understanding color management. Thomson Delmar Learning, Clifton Park

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sorensen JA, Torres TJ (1988) Improved color matching of metal-ceramic restorations part III: innovations in porcelain application. J Prosthet Dent 59(1):1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kourtis SG, Tripodakis AP, Doukoudakis AA (2004) Spectrophotometric evaluation of the optical influence of different metal alloys and porcelains in the metal–ceramic complex. J Prosthet Dent 92(5):477–485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Johnston WM, Kao EC (1989) Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry. J Dent Res 68(5):819–822

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shillingburg HT (2006) Fundamentals of fixed Prosthodontics, 3rd edn. Quintessence, Chicago, pp 142–145

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rhoads JE, Rudd KD, Morrow RM (1985) Dental laboratory procedures: fixed partial dentures, 2nd edn. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 282–284

  31. Lund TW, Sahwabacher WB, Goodkind RJ (1985) Spectrophotometric study of the relationship between body porcelain color and applied metallic oxide pigments. J Prosthet Dent 53(6):790–796

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Source of support

The color of the specimens in this article were studied at “Department of Tanning, Central Leather Research Institute of India, Adyar, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. V. Anitha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anitha, K.V., Dhanraj, M. & Haribabu, R. Comparison of the Effect of Different Ceramic Alloys and Porcelain Systems upon the Color of Metal–Ceramic Restorations: An In Vitro Study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 13, 296–302 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-013-0267-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-013-0267-5

Keywords

Navigation