Skip to main content
Log in

Cephalometric: Evaluation of Influence of Edentulousness on Mandibular Morphology: A Comparative Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society

Abstract

Mandible undergoes several dimensional changes due to aging accompanied with gradual loss of teeth. There is marked alterations in shape and dimensions of the parts of the mandible associated with complete or nearly complete loss of dentition. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of loss of dentition on the dimensions of mandible using lateral cephalogram. The study group comprised of 35 dentulous subjects (age range 25–30 years) and 35 edentulous subjects (age range 45–65 years), with a period of edentulousness of 1–5 years. Subjects were selected based on certain selection criteria and lateral cephalograms were taken. Lateral cephalograms were traced and the values obtained were statistically analyzed using T test. On statistical analysis it was found that the thickness of condylar process and corpus were reduced in edentulous subjects. Length of mandible, ramus and corpus were reduced in edentulous subjects when compared to dentulous subjects. Gonial angle was more obtuse in edentulous subjects. Reduction in thickness of condylar length and length of mandible were negatively correlated to duration of edentulousness. It can be concluded that mandible undergoes significant dimensional changes as a result of loss of teeth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Huumonen S, Sipila K, Haikola B, Tapio M, Soderholm A-L et al (2010) Influence of edentulousness on gonial angle, ramus and condylar height. J Oral Rehabil 37:34–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dutra V, Yang J, Delvin H, Serin C (2004) Mandibular bone remodelling in adults: evaluation of panoramic radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 33:323–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Raustia AM, Pirttiniem P, Salonen MAM, Phytinen J (1998) Effect of edentulousness on mandibular size and condyle-fossa position. J Oral Rehabil 25:174–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Enlow DH, Bianco HJ, Eklund S (1976) The remodeling of the edentulous mandible. J Prosthet Dent 36:685–695

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tallegren A (1972) The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers: a mixed longitudinal study covering 25 years. J Prosthet Dent 27:120–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Athanasiou AE (1995) Orthodontic cephalometry, vol 1. Mosby-Wolfe, London, pp 21–49

    Google Scholar 

  7. Potgieter PJ, Monteith BD (1983) KempPL: the determination of free-way space in edentulous patients—a cephalometric approach. J Oral Rehabil 10:283–293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Xie QF, Ainamo A (2004) Correlation of gonial angle size with cortical thickness, height of mandibular residual body and duration of edentulism. J Prosthet Dent 91:477–482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ingervall B, Thilander B (1974) Relation between facial morphology and activity of masticatory muscles. J Oral Rehabil 1(2):131–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Casey DM, Emrich LJ (1988) Changes in the mandibular angle in the edentulous state. J Prosthet Dent 59:373–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ohm E, Silness J (1999) Size of the mandibular jaw angle related to age, tooth retention and gender. J Oral Rehabil 26:883–891

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Uma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Uma, M., Shetty, R. & Shenoy, K.K. Cephalometric: Evaluation of Influence of Edentulousness on Mandibular Morphology: A Comparative Study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 13, 269–273 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-012-0213-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-012-0213-y

Keywords

Navigation