Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Influence of Occlusal Trauma on Gingival Recession and Gingival Clefts

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the centric occlusal contact pattern in maximum intercuspation and to study the nature of occlusal contacts during maximum intercuspation to protrusive, lateroprotrusive and lateral excursive movements. Fifty subjects having gingival recession and ten subjects having gingival clefts belonging to age group of 18–25 years were selected after obtaining informed consent from the student’s population. The selected subjects were examined and the location and extent of gingival recession, gingival clefts and occlusal wear facets were recorded. The type of occlusion and the nature of occlusal contact in maximum intercuspation and eccentric mandibular movements were also recorded using articulating foil and shimstock. Chi square test, Fisher’s exact test (F) and Z test were used to statistically analyse the data obtained. Among the three occlusal concepts, gingival recession was more commonly related to group function than to canine protected occlusion. Canine protected occlusion was associated with gingival recession on the labial surface while in group function occlusion; the recession was distributed equally on the facial surface of the anterior as well as posterior teeth. Nearly all subjects showed interferences in protrusive, lateroprotrusive and lateral excursive movements on teeth showing gingival recession and gingival clefts. Occlusal wear was seen on all teeth having gingival clefts and on most teeth having gingival recession. These results suggest that occlusal interferences in maximum intercuspation and eccentric movements in one form or the other and absence of mutually protected occlusion can contribute to gingival lesions such as gingival recession and clefts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harrel SK (2004) The effect of occlusal discrepancies on gingival width. J Periodontol 75(1):98–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Solnit A, Stambaugh RV (1983) Treatment of gingival clefts by occlusal therapy. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 3(3):38–55

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bernimoulin J-P, Curilovic Z (1977) Gingival recession and tooth mobility. J Clin Periodontol 4(2):107–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wennström JL (1996) Mucogingival therapy. Ann Periodontol 1:671–701

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Trott JR, Love B (1966) An analysis of localized gingival recession in 766 Winnipeg High School students. Dent Pract Dent Rec 16(6):209–213

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gorman WJ (1967) Prevalence and etiology of gingival recession. J Periodontal 38:316–322

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ingerval B, Meyer D, Stettler B (1992) Tooth contacts in eccentric mandibular positions and facial morphology. J Prosthet Dent 67:317–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Patur B (1969) The role of occlusion and the periodontium in restorative procedures. J Prosthet Dent 21(4):371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bhaskar SN (1967) Occlusion and periodontal disease. Int Dent J 17(2):251–266

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Franklins Ira (1974) Occlusal contacts of the natural teeth. J Prosthet Dent 32:660–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stallard RE (1969) Occlusion: a factor in periodontal disease. Dent Clin of North Am 13(3):599–605

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schelf E (1985) Thickness and marking characteristics of occlusal registration strips. J Prosthet Dent 54(1):122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Halperin GC (1982) Thickness, strength and plastic deformation of occlusal registration strips. J Prosthet Dent 48(5):575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Goldstein GR (1979) The relationship of canine protected occlusion to a periodontal index. J Prosthet Dent 41(3):277–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Broderson SP (1978) Anterior guidance: the key to successful occlusal treatment. J. Prosthet Dent 39:396–400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. O’Leary TJ, Shanley DB, Drake RB (1972) Tooth mobility in cuspid–protection and group function occlusions. J Prosthet Dent 27:21–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Reynolds JM (1970) Occlusal wear facets. J Prosthet Dent 24(4):367–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jin KJ (1992) Clinical diagnosis of trauma from occlusion and its relation with severity of periodontitis. J Clin Periodontal (Denmark) 19(2):92–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Morris ML (1958) The position of the margin of the gingival. Oral Surgery 11:969–984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Novaes AB, Ruben MP, Ken S, Goldman HM, Novaes AB Jr (1975) The development of the periodontal cleft: a clinical and histopathologic study. J Periodontol 46:701–709

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Krishna Prasad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krishna Prasad, D., Sridhar Shetty, N. & Solomon, E.G.R. The Influence of Occlusal Trauma on Gingival Recession and Gingival Clefts. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 13, 7–12 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-012-0158-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-012-0158-1

Keywords

Navigation