Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation and Comparison of the Effect of Different Surface Preparations on Bond Strength of Glass Ionomer Cement with Nickel–Chrome Metal–Ceramic Alloy: A Laboratory Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society

Abstract

Retention of fixed partial dentures is mostly dependent upon the bond between metal and cement as well as cement and tooth structure. However, most of the time clinical failure of bond has been observed at metal and cement interface. The treatment of metal surface, prior to luting, plays a crucial role in bonding cement with the metal. This study is conducted to evaluate and compare the effect of different surface preparations on the bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement with nickel–chromium metal ceramic alloy. Fifty caries-free extracted molar teeth were made flat until the dentin of the occlusal surface was exposed. After fabrication of the wax patterns and subsequent castings, the castings were subjected to porcelain firing cycles. The nickel–chromium metal ceramic alloy discs were also divided into five groups and subjected to various surface treatments: (1) Unsandblasted (U), (2) sandblasted (S), (3) sandblasted and treated with 10% aqueous solution of KMnO4 (SK), (4) unsandblasted and roughened with diamond abrasive points (UD) and (5) unsandblasted and roughened with diamond abrasive points and treated with 10% aqueous solution of KMnO4 (UDK). After surface treatments, the castings were cemented using Fuji PLUS encapsulated resin-modified glass ionomer cement. The obtained values of all the groups were subjected to statistical analysis for Tensile and Shear bond strength. Different surface treatments of the metal affects the bond strength values of resin-modified glass ionomer cement when used as luting agent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rubo JH, Pegoraro LF (1995) Tensile bond strength of a composite resin cement for bonded prosthesis to various dental alloys. J Prosthet Dent 74:230–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kolodney H, Puckett AD, Breazeale MS, Patterson KL, Lentz DL (1992) Shear bond strengths of prosthodontic adhesive systems to a nickel–chromium–beryllium alloy. Quintessence Int 23:65–69

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rubo JH, Pegoraro LF, Marolato F, Rubo MHM (1998) The effect of tin-electroplating on the bond of four dental alloys to resin cement: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 80:27–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Imbery TA, Davis RD (1993) Evaluation of tin plating systems for a high-noble alloy. Int J Prosthodont 6:55–59

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kohli S, Levine WA, Grisius RJ, Fenster RK (1990) The effect of three different surface treatments on the tensile strength of the resin bond to nickel chromium beryllium alloy. J Prosthet Dent 63:4–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Re GJ, Kaiser DA, Malone WFP (1988) Shear bond strengths and scanning electron microscope evaluation of three different retentive methods for resin-bonded retainers. J Prosthet Dent 59:568–573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Anusavice KJ (2003) Phillips science of dental materials, 12th edn. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rosenstiel S, Land MF, Fujimoto J (2001) Contemporary fixed prosthodontics, 3rd edn. Mosby, St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  9. Coehlo CMP, Rubo JH, Pegoraro LF (1996) Tensile bond strength of a resinous cement to a nickel chromium alloy modified with five surface treatments. J Prosthet Dent 76:246–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Campbell SD, Pelletier LB (1992) Thermal cycling distortion of metal ceramics: part I—metal collar width. J Prosthet Dent 67:603–608

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nomoto R, Komoriyama M, McCabe JF, Hirano S (2004) Effect of mixing method on the porosity of encapsulated glass ionomer cement. Dent Mater 20:972–978

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. GC Fuji PLUS. Product and Instruction manual

  13. Livaditis GJ (1986) A chemical etching system for creating micromechanical retention in resin bonded retainers. J Prosthet Dent 86:181–188

    Google Scholar 

  14. Livaditis GJ, Tate DL (1988) Gold plating etched metal surfaces of resin bonded retainers. J Prosthet Dent 59(2):153–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tanaka T, Atsuta M, Nakabayashi N, Masuhara E (1988) Surface treatment of gold alloys for adhesion. J Prosthet Dent 60(3):271–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wilson AD (1990) Resin modified glass ionomer cements. Int J Prosthodont 3:425–429

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tanaka T (1981) 4-META opaque resin—a new resin strongly adhesive to nickel–chromium alloy. J Prosthet Dent

  18. Tanaka T, Fujiyama E, Shimizu H, Takaki A, Atsuta M (1986) Surface treatment of nonprecious alloys for adhesion fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 55(4):456–462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ishijima T, Caputo AA, Mito R (1992) Adhesion of resin to casting alloys. J Prosthet Dent 67:445–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ergin S, Gemalmaz D (2002) Retentive properties of five different luting cements on base and noble metal copings. J Prosthet Dent 88:491–497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mota CS, Demarco FF, Camacho GB, Powers JM (2003) Tensile bond strength of four resin luting agents bonded to bovine enamel and dentin. J Prosthet Dent 89:558–564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The author acknowledges Dr. Anurag Hasti, Mr. Monal Hasti and Dr. Nidhi Gupta for their help during the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Sciences, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India

    Kalpana Hasti & H. G. Jagadeesh

  2. Department of Prosthodontics, Rajasthan Dental College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

    Narendra P. Patil

Authors
  1. Kalpana Hasti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. G. Jagadeesh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Narendra P. Patil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kalpana Hasti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hasti, K., Jagadeesh, H.G. & Patil, N.P. Evaluation and Comparison of the Effect of Different Surface Preparations on Bond Strength of Glass Ionomer Cement with Nickel–Chrome Metal–Ceramic Alloy: A Laboratory Study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 11, 14–19 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-011-0043-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-011-0043-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation