Skip to main content

Use of Diagnostic and Surgical Stent: A Simplified Approach for Implant Placement

Abstract

Dental implantology has emerged as a practical alternative to traditional prosthodontics. Since the beginning, placement of implant in the bone to achieve a prosthetic solution that fulfils biologic, aesthetic and biomechanical requirements has been a challenge. In the past, implant site and inclination were dictated by residual bone quality. The desire for predictable prosthesis led to the development of prosthetically guided implantology. This concept establishes the correct implant position during the diagnostic stage according to planned definitive restoration. In prosthetically guided implantology where ideal placement of implant is determined by the definitive restoration, use of radiographic and surgical stent in conjunction with dental CT scan can play an important role. A stent is an appliance used for radiographic evaluation during treatment planning for implant placement and during surgical procedures to locate optimal implant placement site. The stent with dental CT scan enables the dental team to identify specific sites of prospective implant surgery and hence determines the optimal position and angulation of implant relative to occlusal load. Aided by stent the surgeon can avoid undesirable implant site preparation and minimize unnecessary osteotomy, resulting in favorable design of prosthesis, reduced surgical trauma, reduced surgical time and increased patient comfort. This case report is an insight into the method of fabrication of simple and cost effective stent for implant placement and its advantages over the other techniques of stent fabrication.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. Almong DM, Torrado E, Meitner SW (2001) Fabrication of imaging and surgical guides for dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 85:504–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Garber DA (1995) The esthetic dental implant: letting restoration be the guide. J Am Dent Assoc 126:319–325

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lazzara RJ (1993) Effect of implant position on implant restoration design. J Esthet Dent 5:265–269

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Horiuchi M, Ichikawa T, Kanitani H et al (1995) Pilot-hole preparation for proper implant positioning and the enhancement of bone formation. J Oral Implantol 21:318–324

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Almog DM, Onufrak JM, Hebel K et al (1995) Comparison between planned prosthetic trajectory and residual bone trajectory using surgical guides and tomography—a pilot study. J Oral Implantol 21:275–280

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Taylor TD, Agar JR, Voigiatzi (2000) Implant prosthodontics: current perspective and future directions. Int J Maxillofac Implants 15:66–75

    Google Scholar 

  7. Engelman MJ, Sorenson JA, Moy P (1988) Optimum Placement of Osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 59:467–473

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Modica F, Fava C, Benech A et al (1991) Radiologic-prosthetic planning of the surgical phase of the treatment of edentulism by osseointegrated implants: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 65:541–546

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pesun IJ, Gardner FM (1995) Fabrication of a guide for radiographic evaluation and surgical placement of implants. J Prosthet Dent 73:548–552

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stellino G, Morgano SM, Imbelloni A (1995) A dual-purpose, implant stent made from a provisional fixed partial denture. J Prosthet Dent 74:212–214

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sethi A (1993) Precise site location for implants using CT scans: a technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 8:433–438

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Basten CH (1995) The use of radiopaque templates for predictable implant placement. Quintessence Int 26:609–612

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Takeshita F, Suetsugu T (1996) Accurate presurical determination for implant placement by using computerized tomography scan. J Prosthet Dent 76:590–591

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Takeshita F, Tokoshima T, Suetsugu (1997) A stent for presurgical evaluation of implant placement. J Prosthet Dent 77:36–38

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Meitner SW, Tallents RH (2004) Surgical Templates for prosthetically guided implant placement. J Prosthet Dent 92:569–574

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Atsu SS (2006) A Surgical guide for dental implant placement in edentulous posterior regions. J Prosthet Dent 96:129–133

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Stumpel LJ (2008) Cast based guided implant placement: a novel technique. J Prosthet Dent 100:61–69

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Akca k, Iplikcioglu H, Cehreli MC (2002) A surgical guide for accurate mesiodistal paralleling of implants in the posterior edentulous mandible. J Prosthet Dent 87:233–235

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Choi M, Romberg Elaine, Driscoll (2004) Effect of varied dimensions of surgical guides on implant angulations. J Prosthet Dent 92:463–469

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tsuchida F, Hosoi T, Imanaka M, Kobayashi K (2004) A technique for making a diagnostic and surgical template. J Prosthet Dent 91:395–397

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shotwell JL, Billy EJ, Wang HL, Oh TJ (2005) Implant surgical guide fabrication for partially edentulous patients. J Prosthet Dent 93:294–297

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Balendra Pratap Singh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Talwar, N., Singh, B.P., Chand, P. et al. Use of Diagnostic and Surgical Stent: A Simplified Approach for Implant Placement. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 10, 234–239 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-010-0036-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-010-0036-7

Keywords

  • Diagnostic stent
  • Surgical stent
  • CT scan
  • Dental implant