Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Standardizing Research Training: a Pilot Curriculum Within a Hematology/Oncology Fellowship Program

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While scholarly activity is recognized as critical in cancer education, there is an outstanding need for methods to define research learning competencies and tools for formal research productivity and competency assessment. We piloted and studied a novel educational initiative within the University of Wisconsin Hematology/Oncology fellowship program, establishing a professional learning community (PLC) of research mentors and developing a formative evaluation tool, a research portfolio. We developed a PLC engaged in reflective conversations about intended learning outcomes and effective instructional strategies. Subsequently, a research portfolio was piloted with four first-year Hematology/Oncology fellows at the start of the 2020 academic year in which trainees document, critically evaluate, and reflect upon the knowledge, skills, confidence, and productivity acquired during research training. We employed surveys to evaluate the initiative. Seven Hematology/Oncology fellows (7/12, 58%) completed pre-intervention and six-month interim evaluation surveys, with 43% (3/7) identifying an increased confidence in quality of research training strategies following the pilot initiation. All four first-year fellows that piloted the research portfolio (4/4, 100%) completed interim evaluation surveys that demonstrated benefits of the research portfolio including self-reflection and goal setting. Research portfolio scoring correlated with other markers of academic success, suggesting its potential to predict research success. Our data suggest that bringing together a community of research mentors to generate shared learning goals and develop the framework for a formative evaluation portfolio may meet critical needs research training needs in cancer education. Given promising results, we aim to create a new educational tool for research training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lyle JL, Vandergrift JL, Hinkel JM et al (2012) Influential factors for post-fellowship career decision-making: an NCCN survey. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 10(8):969–974. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2012.0101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. DeLong MR, Hughes DB, Tandon VJ, Choi BD, Zenn MR (2014) Factors influencing fellowship selection, career trajectory, and academic productivity among plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg 133(3):730–736. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000438043.98762.51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Straus SE, Straus C, Tzanetos K (2006) International Campaign to Revitalise Academic Medicine. Career choice in academic medicine: systematic review. J Gen Intern Med 21(12):1222–1229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00599.

  4. Horn L, Koehler E, Gilbert J, Johnson DH (2011) Factors associated with the career choices of hematology and medical oncology fellows trained at academic institutions in the United States. J Clin Oncol 29(29):3932–3938. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.35.8663

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Harris A, Jones M. (2013) System improvement through capacity building; The power and potential of professional learning communities. Large Scale School Reform and Social Capital Building. 140–154.

  6. Newmann FM (1991) Linking Restructuring to Authentic Student-Achievement. Phi Delta Kappan 72(6):458–463

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hargreaves AOC, M.T (2017) Cultures of professional collaboration: their origins and opponents. J Prof Cap Community 2:74–85

  8. Vescio VRD, Adams A (2008) A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning.Teach Teach Educ 24:80–91

  9. Jarvis RM, O’Sullivan PS, McClain T, Clardy JA (2004) Can one portfolio measure the six ACGME general competencies? Acad Psychiatry 28(3):190–196. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.28.3.190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mann K, Gordon J, MacLeod A (2009) Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: a systematic review. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 14(4):595–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-007-9090-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This project was supported by a University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Medical Education Innovation Grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie L. Pritzl.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pritzl, S.L., Lang, L.M., Osman, F. et al. Standardizing Research Training: a Pilot Curriculum Within a Hematology/Oncology Fellowship Program. J Canc Educ 38, 713–717 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-022-02181-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-022-02181-9

Keywords

Navigation