Skip to main content
Log in

Educating Childhood Cancer Survivors: a Qualitative Analysis of Parents Mobilizing Social and Cultural Capital

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Childhood cancer impacts the child patient as well as the family and caregivers throughout diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship. Secondary analysis of qualitative data revealed the critical role of parents’ adaptability and flexibility when navigating advocacy decisions about their child’s schooling following diagnosis and through survivorship. After cancer, adjusting to school means adjusting to a new normal creating challenges related to curriculum, peers, and educators that can affect quality of life. Critically, parents’ adjustment to a new advocacy role emerged as an important consideration. Concepts of social and cultural capital aid in understanding the experiences of parents whose children have returned to school following their successful treatment for pediatric cancer. Framed in this way, how parents mobilize (or do not mobilize) these forms of capital as they devise strategies to support their children are understood. This study interprets parent reports and actions as taken often in the hope that they will help both their own child and others that follow, creating mutual benefit for the network of people touched by cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Percentages have been rounded and may exceed 100%.

References

  1. Antill Keener T (2019) Childhood Cancer-related fatigue and day-to-day quality of life. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs 36(2):74–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Peckham VC, Meadows AT, Bartel N, Marrero O (1988) Educational late effects in long-term survivors of childhood acute lymphocytic leukemia. Pediatrics 81(1):127–133

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gurney JG, Krull KR, Kadan-Lottick N, Nicholson HS, Nathan PC, Zebrack B, Terzak JM, Ness KK (2009) Social outcomes in the childhood cancer survivor study cohort. J Clin Oncol 27(14):2390–2395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Moore BD III (2005) Neurocognitive outcomes in survivors of childhood cancer. J Pediatr Psychol 30(1):51–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen MH (1993) The unknown and the unknowable-managing sustained uncertainty. West J Nurs Res 15(1):77–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pearson LJ, Oyebode F (2009) Social capital and childhood psychiatric disorders: a cross-sectional study. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 14(2):183–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bourdieu P (1986) The forms of capital. In: Richardson JG (ed) Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. Greenwood, New York, pp 241–258

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pearce N, Davey Smith G (2003) Is social capital the key to inequalities in health? Am J Public Health 93(1):122–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rose R (2000) How much does social capital add to individual health? Soc Sci Med 51(9):1421–1435

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Morrow V (2001) Networks and neighbourhoods: children’s and young people’s perspectives. Health Education Authority, London

    Google Scholar 

  11. Trainor AA (2010) Reexamining the promise of parent participation in special education: an analysis of cultural and social capital. Anthropol Educ Q 41(3):245–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ellison NB, Steinfield C, Lampe C (2011) Connection strategies: social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media Soc 13(6):873–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Able T (2007) Cultural capital in health promotion. In: McQueen D, McQueen DV, Kickbusch I, Potvin L, Balbo L, Abel T, Pelikan JM (eds) Health and modernity: the role of theory in health promotion, Chapter 5 edn. Springer Science & Business Media, New York, pp 43–72

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Lamont M, Lareau A (1988) Cultural capital: allusions, gaps and glissandos in recent theoretical developments. Sociological Theory 6:153–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ohashi Y, Taguchi A, Omori J, Ozaki A (2017) Cultural capital: a concept analysis. Public Health Nurs 34(4):380–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Paré-Blagoev EJ, Ruble K, Bryant C, Jacobson L (2019) Schooling in survivorship: understanding caregiver challenges when survivors return to school. Psycho-oncology 28(4):847–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ruble K, Paré-Blagoev J, Cooper S, Martin A, Jacobson LA (2019) Parent perspectives on oncology team communication regarding neurocognitive impacts of cancer therapy and school reentry. Pediatr Blood Cancer 66(1):e27427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Heaton J (2008) Secondary analysis of qualitative data: an overview. Hist Soc Res/Historische Sozialforschung 33:33–45

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hinds PS, Vogel RJ, Clarke-Steffen L (1997) The possibilities and pitfalls of doing a secondary analysis of a qualitative data set. Qual Health Res 7(3):408–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Szabo V, Strang VR (1997) Secondary analysis of qualitative data. Adv Nurs Sci 20(2):66–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Seale C, Silverman D (1997) Ensuring rigour in qualitative research. Eur J Publ Health 7(4):379–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Foley G, Timonen V (2015) Using grounded theory method to capture and analyze health care experiences. Health Serv Res 50(4):1195–1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Urquhart C (2013) Grounded theory for qualitative research: a practical guide. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Ward E, DeSantis C, Robbins A, Kohler B, Jemal A (2014) Childhood and adolescent cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 64(2):83–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bhatia S (2011) Disparities in cancer outcomes: lessons learned from children with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 56(6):994–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors would like to thank the parents and stakeholders participating in the PCORI-funded Engagement (#3916) project for their expertise in capturing pertinent content for the survey, and the families completing the survey online. This article was made possible by additional support from training grant: T32 CA 009314 (PI: Platz).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dori Beeler.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Review Board (IRB00126818) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beeler, D., Paré-Blagoev, E.J., Jacobson, L.A. et al. Educating Childhood Cancer Survivors: a Qualitative Analysis of Parents Mobilizing Social and Cultural Capital. J Canc Educ 36, 819–825 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-020-01709-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-020-01709-1

Keywords

Navigation