Adolescents’ and Young Adults’ Aesthetics and Functionality Preferences for Online Tobacco Education
- 115 Downloads
As cigarette use rates decline among adolescents and young adults, public health officials face new challenges with high use of non-cigarette tobacco products (NCTPs). Online tobacco education is a potential solution to discourage use, yet limited information is available for how online media should look and function. This study aims to fill this gap by conducting focus group interviews to identify adolescents and young adults’ aesthetic and functionality preferences for online tobacco education (phase 1) followed by interviews to assess a NCTP education website developed (phase 2). We found preferences for use of font and colors to highlight tobacco information in organized designs. Interactive features (quizzes) motivated engagement, and participants desired responsive designs that function similarly across devices. Public health researchers and educators should apply aesthetic and functionality preferences to reduce NCTP use and help create a tobacco-free future for youth.
KeywordseHealth Tobacco prevention and control Health communication Health promotion User experience
Research reported in this publication was supported by P50CA180907 from the National Cancer Institute and FDA Center for Tobacco Products (CTP). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH or the Food and Drug Administration.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
This study was approved by [the University of North Carolina] IRB.
- 7.Pew Research Center. 2018. Mobile fact sheet. February 5, 2018; Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/mobile/. Accessed 20 Oct 2018
- 15.King, BA, Patel, R, Nguyen, K, et al. 2014. Trends in awareness and use of electronic cigarettes among US adults, 2010-2013. Nicotine & Tobacco Research ntu191Google Scholar
- 21.Lazard AJ, Mackert M (2015) E-health first impressions and visual evaluations: key design principles for attention and appeal. Commun Des Quart 3:25–34Google Scholar
- 22.Nielsen, J. 2003. The ten most violated homepage design guidelines. Available from: http://www.nngroup.com/articles/most-violated-homepage-guidelines/
- 25.Richardson RT, Drexler TL, Delparte DM (2014) Color and contrast in E-learning design: a review of the literature and recommendations for instructional designers and web developers. J Online Learn Teac 10:657–669Google Scholar
- 28.Brumberger E (2003) The rhetoric of typography: the persona of typeface and text. Tech Commun 50:206–223Google Scholar
- 29.Anderson, J and Rainie, L. 2012. Main findings: teens, technology, and human potential in 2020. Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/2012/02/29/main-findings-teens-technology-and-human-potential-in-2020/. Accessed 20 Oct 2018
- 36.Sanders J, Munford R (2017) Hidden in plain view: finding and enhancing the participation of marginalized young people in research. Int J Qual Methods 16(1):–12 160940691770476Google Scholar