Assessment of Radiology Training During Radiation Oncology Residency
A strong foundation in diagnostic imaging is essential to the practice of radiation oncology. This study evaluated radiology training in radiation oncology residency. An online survey was distributed to current radiation oncology residents in the USA by e-mail in 2017. Responses were summarized using frequency and percentages and compared with chi-square test and Spearman’s rank correlation when appropriate. One hundred five residents completed the survey. Although most residents felt that a strong knowledge base in diagnostic radiology was moderately or extremely important (87%, n = 90/104), the majority were only somewhat confident in their radiology skills (61%, n = 63/104) and were only somewhat, minimally, or not at all satisfied with their training (79%, n = 81/103). Although there was an association between increasing post-graduate training and confidence level (p = 0.01062, ρ = 0.24959), the majority of graduating residents feel only somewhat confident in radiology skills (63%, n = 12/19). Residents were most commonly exposed to radiology via multidisciplinary conferences (96%, n = 100/104), though only 15% (n = 16/104) of residents ranked these as the most beneficial component of their radiology training and 13% (n = 13/101) of residents felt these were the least beneficial. Most residents (60%, n = 63/105) believe there is a need for dedicated radiology training during residency, preferring monthly formal didactics (68%, n = 71/105) co-taught by a radiologist and radiation oncologist (58%, n = 61/105). Radiation oncology residents feel their radiology training is suboptimal, suggesting a need for more guidance and standardization of radiology curriculum. A preferred option may be monthly didactics co-taught by radiologists and radiation oncologists; however, future studies should assess the effectiveness of this model.
KeywordsRadiation oncology Radiology Residency education Residency curriculum
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Exempted by the Partners Healthcare institutional review board (IRB).
- 3.Butler KL, Chang Y, DeMoya M, Feinstein A, Ferrada P, Maduekwe U, Maung AA, Melo N, Odom S, Olasky J, Reinhorn M, Smink DB, Stassen N, Wilson CT, Fagenholz P, Kaafarani H, King D, Yeh DD, Velmahos G, Stefanidis D (2016) Needs assessment for a focused radiology curriculum in surgical residency: a multicenter study. Am J Surg 211(1):279–287CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Nabavizadeh N, Burt LM, Mancini BR, Morris ZS, Walker AJ, Miller SM, Bhavsar S, Mohindra P, Kim MB, Kharofa J (2016) Results of the 2013–2015 Association of Residents in Radiation Oncology survey of chief residents in the United States. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 94(2):228–234CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Burmeister J, Chen Z, Chetty IJ, Dieterich S, Doemer A, Dominello MM, Howell RM, McDermott P, Nalichowski A, Prisciandaro J, Ritter T, Smith C, Schreiber E, Shafman T, Sutlief S, Xiao Y (2016) The American Society for Radiation Oncology’s 2015 core physics curriculum for radiation oncology residents. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 95(4):1298–1303CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar