Assessment of Radiology Training During Radiation Oncology Residency

  • Shanna A. Matalon
  • Stephanie A. Howard
  • Matthew J. Abrams
Article

Abstract

A strong foundation in diagnostic imaging is essential to the practice of radiation oncology. This study evaluated radiology training in radiation oncology residency. An online survey was distributed to current radiation oncology residents in the USA by e-mail in 2017. Responses were summarized using frequency and percentages and compared with chi-square test and Spearman’s rank correlation when appropriate. One hundred five residents completed the survey. Although most residents felt that a strong knowledge base in diagnostic radiology was moderately or extremely important (87%, n = 90/104), the majority were only somewhat confident in their radiology skills (61%, n = 63/104) and were only somewhat, minimally, or not at all satisfied with their training (79%, n = 81/103). Although there was an association between increasing post-graduate training and confidence level (p = 0.01062, ρ = 0.24959), the majority of graduating residents feel only somewhat confident in radiology skills (63%, n = 12/19). Residents were most commonly exposed to radiology via multidisciplinary conferences (96%, n = 100/104), though only 15% (n = 16/104) of residents ranked these as the most beneficial component of their radiology training and 13% (n = 13/101) of residents felt these were the least beneficial. Most residents (60%, n = 63/105) believe there is a need for dedicated radiology training during residency, preferring monthly formal didactics (68%, n = 71/105) co-taught by a radiologist and radiation oncologist (58%, n = 61/105). Radiation oncology residents feel their radiology training is suboptimal, suggesting a need for more guidance and standardization of radiology curriculum. A preferred option may be monthly didactics co-taught by radiologists and radiation oncologists; however, future studies should assess the effectiveness of this model.

Keywords

Radiation oncology Radiology Residency education Residency curriculum 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

IRB

Exempted by the Partners Healthcare institutional review board (IRB).

Supplementary material

13187_2018_1357_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (134 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 134 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Scarsbrook AF, Graham RNJ, Perriss RW (2006) Radiology education: a glimpse into the future. Clin Radiol 61(8):640–648CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Balter JM, Haffty BG, Dunnick NR, Siegel EL (2011) Imaging opportunities in radiation oncology. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 79(2):342–347CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Butler KL, Chang Y, DeMoya M, Feinstein A, Ferrada P, Maduekwe U, Maung AA, Melo N, Odom S, Olasky J, Reinhorn M, Smink DB, Stassen N, Wilson CT, Fagenholz P, Kaafarani H, King D, Yeh DD, Velmahos G, Stefanidis D (2016) Needs assessment for a focused radiology curriculum in surgical residency: a multicenter study. Am J Surg 211(1):279–287CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gunderman RB, Siddiqui AR, Heitkamp DE, Kipfer HD (2003) The vital role of radiology in the medical school curriculum. Am J Roentgenol 180(5):1239–1242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42(2):377–381CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nabavizadeh N, Burt LM, Mancini BR, Morris ZS, Walker AJ, Miller SM, Bhavsar S, Mohindra P, Kim MB, Kharofa J (2016) Results of the 2013–2015 Association of Residents in Radiation Oncology survey of chief residents in the United States. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 94(2):228–234CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cabrera AR, Lee WR, Madden R, Sims E, Hoang JK, White LE, Marks LB, Chino JP (2011) Incorporating gross anatomy education into radiation oncology residency: a 2-year curriculum with evaluation of resident satisfaction. J Am Coll Radiol 8(5):335–340CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chino JP, Lee WR, Madden R, Sims EL, Kivell TL, Doyle SK, Mitchell TL, Hoppenworth EJ, Marks LB (2011) Teaching the anatomy of oncology: evaluating the impact of a dedicated oncoanatomy course. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 79(3):853–859CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Labranche L, Johnson M, Palma D, D'Souza L, Jaswal J (2015) Integrating anatomy training into radiation oncology residency: considerations for developing a multidisciplinary, interactive learning module for adult learners. Anat Sci Educ 8(2):158–165CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Klein EE, Balter JM, Chaney EL, Gerbi BJ, Hughes L (2004) ASTRO’s core physics curriculum for radiation oncology residents. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60(3):697–705CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Klein EE, Gerbi B, Meli J, Marsden D (1997) 1995 survey of physics teaching efforts in radiation oncology residency programs. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 38(2):441–446CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Burmeister J, Chen Z, Chetty IJ, Dieterich S, Doemer A, Dominello MM, Howell RM, McDermott P, Nalichowski A, Prisciandaro J, Ritter T, Smith C, Schreiber E, Shafman T, Sutlief S, Xiao Y (2016) The American Society for Radiation Oncology’s 2015 core physics curriculum for radiation oncology residents. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 95(4):1298–1303CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Association for Cancer Education 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shanna A. Matalon
    • 1
    • 2
  • Stephanie A. Howard
    • 2
    • 3
  • Matthew J. Abrams
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyBrigham and Women’s HospitalBostonUSA
  2. 2.Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  3. 3.Department of ImagingDana-Farber Cancer InstituteBostonUSA
  4. 4.Department of Radiation OncologyBeth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations