Skip to main content


Log in

Effectiveness of Online Cancer Education for Nurses and Allied Health Professionals; a Systematic Review Using Kirkpatrick Evaluation Framework

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript


Embedding online learning within higher education can provide engaging, cost-effective, interactive and flexible education. By evaluating the impact, outcomes and pedagogical influence of online cancer and education, future curricula can be shaped and delivered by higher education providers to better meet learner, health care provider and educational commissioners’ requirements for enhanced patient care and service delivery needs. Using the Kirkpatrick’s four-level model of educational evaluation, a systematic review of the effectiveness of online cancer education for nurses and allied health professionals was conducted. From 101 articles, 30 papers were included in the review. Educational theory is not always employed. There is an absence of longitudinal studies to examine impact; an absence of reliability and/or validity testing of measures, limited experimental designs taking account of power and few attempts to mitigate bias. There is, however, an emerging innovative use of mobile/spaced learning techniques. Evidence for clinical and educational effectiveness is weak offering insights into experiences and participant perceptions rather than concrete quantitative data and patient-reported outcomes. More pedagogical research is merited to inform effective evaluation of online cancer education, which incorporates and demonstrates a longer-term impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. WHO (2014) World Cancer Report.

  2. Klemp JR, Frazier LM, Glennon C, Trunecek J, Irwin M (2011) Improving cancer survivorship care: oncology nurses’ educational needs and preferred methods of learning. J Cancer Educ 26(2):234–242.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kelly D, Gould D, White I, Jane Berridge E (2006) Modernising cancer and palliative care education in the UK: insights from one Cancer Network. Eur J Oncol Nurs 10(3):187–197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Childs S, Blenkinsopp E, Hall A, Walton G (2005) Effective e-learning for health professionals and students—barriers and their solutions. A systematic review of the literature—findings from the HeXL project. Health Infomation Library J 22(Suppl 2):20–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wilkinson A, Forbes A, Bloomfield J, Gee CF (2004) An exploration of four web-based open and flexible learning modules in post-registration nurse education. International Journal Nursing Studies 41(4):411–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson L, Ousley A, Swarz J, Bingham RJ, Erickson JB, Ellis S, Moody T (2011) The art and science of cancer education and evaluation: toward facilitating improved patient outcomes. J Cancer Educ 26(1):27–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ellen Wyatt D (2007) The impact of oncology education on practice—a literature review. European Journal Oncology Nursing 11(3):255–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Linkov F, Omenn GS, Serageldin I, Cerf V, Lovalekar M, LaPorte R (2010) Multilayer and multimetric quality control: the supercourse. J Cancer Educ 25(4):478–483.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kirkpatrick DL (1967) Evaluation of training. In: Craig RL, Bittel LR (eds) Training and development handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Doorenbos AZ, Lindhorst T, Schim SM, van Schaik E, Demiris G, Wechkin HA, Curtis JR (2010) Development of a web-based educational intervention to improve cross-cultural communication among hospice providers. Journal Social Work End Life Palliative Care 6(3-4):236–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McInally W, Masters H, Key S (2012) The impact of paediatric oncology education on clinical practice—a phenomenological study. European Journal Oncology Nursing 16:498–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. McGuigan D, Moule P, Lockyer L (2008) An evaluation of an approach to e-learning in a cancer care setting. Cancer Nursing  Practice 7:37–41

  13. Koczwara B, Francis K, Marine F, Goldstein D, Underhill C, Olver I (2010) Reaching further with online education? The development of an effective online program in palliative oncology. J Cancer Educ 25(3):317–323.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Blazer K, Christie C, Uman G, Weitzel J (2012) Impact of web-based case conferencing on cancer genetics training outcomes for community-based clinicians. J Cancer Educ 27(2):217–225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brink SG, McFarren AE, Lincoln JM, Birney AJ (2004) Cancer CAM: web-based continuing education for health professionals. Complement Health Practice Review 9(1):43–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McLeod D, Curran J, White M (2011) Interprofessional psychosocial oncology education: nurse outcomes of the IPODE project. Psycho-Oncologie 5(2):109–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rashleigh L, Cordon C, Wong J (2011) Creating opportunities to support oncology nursing practice: surviving and thriving. Canadian Oncology Nursing Journal 21(1):7–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Joubert A, Viljoen MJ, Venter JA, Bester CJ (2002) Evaluation of the effect of a computer-based teaching programme developed on knowledge, problem solving and learning approach. Heal SA Gesondheid 7(4):80–97

  19. Hall P, Weaver L, Willett TG (2011) Addressing suffering through an inter-professional online module: learning with, from, and about each other. Journal. Palliative Care 27:244–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Letizia M, Jones T (2012) An educational intervention for nurse practitioners providing palliative care in nursing homes. Journal Hospital Palliative Nursing 14:351–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wittenberg-Lyles E, Goldsmith J, Ferrell B, Burchett M (2014) Assessment of an interprofessional online curriculum for palliative care communication training. J Palliat Med 17(4):400–406.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Moore S, Hunt P, Darlison L, Russell D, Glenhill D, Brighton D (2012) Improving nurses skills through e-learning. Cancer Nurs Pract 11(1):14–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kinghorn S (2005) Delivering multiprofessional web-based psychosocial education: the lessons learnt. International Journal Palliative Nursing 11(8):432–437. 10.12968/ijpn.2005.11.8.19613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Faiman B (2011) Overview and experience of a nursing e-mentorship program. Clinical Journal Oncology Nursing 15(4):418–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chapman N, Oultram S (2008) Piloting e-learning in a radiation oncology department. Journal Medicine Imaging Radiation Science 39(2):81–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Smith T, Gordon T (2009) Developing spiritual and religious care competencies in practice: pilot of a Marie Curie blended learning event. International Journal Palliative Nursing 15:86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Arenella C, Yox S, Eckstein DS, Ousley A (2010) Expanding the reach of a cancer palliative care curriculum through Web-based dissemination: a public-private collaboration. Journal Cancer Education 25:418–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ellman MS, Schulman-Green D, Blatt L, Asher S, Viveiros D, Clark J, Bia M (2012) Using online learning and interactive simulation to teach spiritual and cultural aspects of palliative care to interprofessional students. Journal Palliat Med 15(11):1240–1247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fenton G (2014) Involving a young person in the development of a digital resource in nurse education. Nurse Educ Pract 14(1):49–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Trocky NM, McLeskey SW, McGuire D, Griffith K, Plusen A (2011) Improving nursing students’ breast cancer knowledge through a novel academic and non-profit foundation partnership. Journal of Nurse Education 50(6):341–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cushen N, Bacon A, Roddis M (2002) Using an interactive chemotherapy training package to improve patient safety. Hospital Medicine 63(5):301–303. 10.12968/hosp.2002.63.5.2025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Meade CD, Martinez D, Schullo S, McMillan S (2006) Distance learning for communicating cancer, culture, and literacy: a model for cancer control advancement. Journal of Cancer Educucation 21(2):63–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Probost H, Eddy D, Doughty JO, Hodgson D (2009) Integrating E-learning into postgraduate radiotherapy and oncology education: a case study. E-Learning Digital Media 6:363–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Smith S, Arnold G, Kinghorn S, Poppleton A (2010) Using e-learning to develop communication skills when assessing patients’ end of life needs. Nurs Times 106:20–22

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Joubert A, Viljoen MJ, Venter JA (2002) Evaluation of a computer-based teaching programme (CBTP) developed for student nurses in an oncology clinical setting. Heal SA Gesondheid 7:70–79

    Google Scholar 

  36. Jerome-D’ EB, Merwin E, Stern S (2010) Feasibility of using technology to disseminate evidence to rural nurses and improve patient outcomes. J Continuning Education Nursing 41(1):25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kerfoot BP, Lawler EV, Sokolovskaya G, Gagnon D, Conlin PR (2010) Durable improvements in prostate cancer screening from online spaced education a randomized controlled trial. American Journal Preventative Medicine 39(5):472–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Phillips JL, Heneka N, Hickman L, Lam L, Shaw T (2014) Impact of a novel online learning module on specialist palliative care nurses’ pain assessment competencies and patients’ reports of pain: results from a quasi-experimental pilot study. Palliat Med 28(6):521–529.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lewis L (2008) E-learning in cervical screening techniques. Primary Health Care 18(5):22–23

Download references


We would like to thank Sheena Moffatt, Information Services Advisor, Dr. Geraldine Matthews -Smith, Edinburgh Napier University, UK, and Dr. Anne Williams, Queen Margaret College University, UK.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen Campbell.

Electronic supplementary material


(DOCX 22 kb)


(DOCX 66 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Campbell, K., Taylor, V. & Douglas, S. Effectiveness of Online Cancer Education for Nurses and Allied Health Professionals; a Systematic Review Using Kirkpatrick Evaluation Framework. J Canc Educ 34, 339–356 (2019).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: