Journal of Cancer Education

, Volume 34, Issue 1, pp 105–110 | Cite as

Development of a Rating Tool for Mobile Cancer Apps: Information Analysis and Formal and Content-Related Evaluation of Selected Cancer Apps

  • Cathleen Böhme
  • Marc Baron von Osthoff
  • Katrin Frey
  • Jutta HübnerEmail author


Mobile apps are offered in large numbers and have different qualities. The aim of this article was to develop a rating tool based on formal and content-related criteria for the assessment of cancer apps and to test its applicability on apps. After a thorough analysis of the literature, we developed a specific rating tool for cancer apps based on the MARS (mobile app rating system) and a rating tool for cancer websites. This instrument was applied to apps freely available in stores and focusing on some cancer topic. Ten apps were rated on the basis of 22 criteria. Sixty percent of the apps (6/10) were rated poor and insufficient. The rating by different scientists was homogenous. The good apps had reliable sources were regularly updated and had a concrete intent/purpose in their app description. In contrast, the apps that were rated poor had no distinction of scientific content and advertisement. In some cases, there was no imprint to identify the provider. As apps of poor quality can give misinformation and lead to wrong treatment decisions, efforts have to be made to increase usage of high-quality apps. Certification would help cancer patients to identify reliable apps, yet acceptance of a certification system must be backed up.


Mobile apps Application Cancer Oncology Rating tool 


Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    WHO [Online]. Available from: [last accessed 5 May 2017]
  2. 2.
    Bericht zum Krebsgeschehen in Deutschland (2016) Zentrum für Krebsregisterdaten im Robert Koch-Institut (Hrsg). Berlin, 2016Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rudolph I, Seilacher E, Koster M-J, Stellamanns J, Liebl P, Zell J et al (2015) Der Informationsbedarf von Patienten mit Krebserkrankungen in Deutschland - eine Befragung von Patienten und Angehorigen. Dtsch Med Wochenschr (1946) 140(5):e43–e47. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-100585 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heimer A, Henkel M. Bedarf an Krebsinformationen in der Bevölkerung: Analyse des Informationsverhaltens von Ratsuchenden. Repräsentative Befragung im Auftrag des Krebsinformationsdienstes des Deutschen Krebsforschungszentrums [last accessed 27 Apr 2017]
  5. 5.
    James N, Danielsy H, Rahmany R et al (2007) A study of information seeking by cancer patients and their careers. Clin Oncol 19:356e–362eCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liebl, P.; Seilacher, E.; Koester, M. J.; Stellamanns, J.; Zell, J.; Hubner, J. (2015): What cancer patients find in the internet: the visibility of evidence-based patient information—analysis of information on German websites. Oncol Res Treat 38 (5), S. 212–218. DOI: 10.1159/000381739
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Albrecht, U.-V.:KapitelKurzfassung.In:Albrecht, U.-V.(Hrsg.),ChancenundRisikenvon Gesundheits-Apps (CHARISMHA). Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, 2016, S. 14–47. urn:nbn:de:gbv:084–16040811173.
  9. 9.
    Bender JL, Yue RY, To MJ, Deacken L, Jadad AR (2013) A lot of action, but not in the right direction: systematic review and content analysis of smartphone applications for the prevention, detection, and management of cancer. J Med Internet Res 15(12):e287. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2661 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Collado-Borrell, R.; Escudero-Vilaplana, V.; Ribed-Sanchez, A.; Ibanez-Garcia, S.; Herranz-Alonso, A.; Sanjurjo-Saez, M. (2016): Smartphone applications for cancer patients; what we know about them? Farm Hosp 40 (1), S. 25–35. DOI: 10.7399/fh.2016.40.1.8993
  11. 11.
    Aitken, Murray; Gauntlett, Carolyn (2017) Healthcare mobile apps and patient mobile apps. IMS Health. Available from: [last accessed 26 Apr 2017]
  12. 12.
    Pandey, Ambarish; Hasan, Sayeedul; Dubey, Divyanshu; Sarangi, Sasmit (2013): Smartphone apps as a source of cancer information: changing trends in health information-seeking behavior. In: J Cancer Educ 28 (1), S. 138–142. DOI:  10.1007/s13187-012-0446-9
  13. 13.
    Brouard, B.; Bardo, P.; Bonnet, C.; Mounier, N.; Vignot, M.; Vignot, S. (2016): Mobile applications in oncology: is it possible for patients and healthcare professionals to easily identify relevant tools? In: Ann Med 48 (7), S. 509–515. DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2016.1195010
  14. 14.
    App Store Review Guidelines–Apple Developer [Online]. Available from: [last accessed 5 May 2017]
  15. 15.
    Google Play [Online]. Available from: [last accessed 5 May 2017]
  16. 16.
    Stoyanov SR, Hides L, Kavanagh DJ, Zelenko O, Tjondronegoro D, Mani M (2015) Mobile app rating scale: a new tool for assessing the quality of health mobile apps. JMIR mHealth uHealth 3(1):e27. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3422 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Steckelberg A, Berger B, Köpke S, Heesen C, Mühlhauser I (2005) Kriterien für evidenzbasierte Patienteninformationen. Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich 99:343351Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pubmed/Medline (NLM) 12. Ärztliches Zentrum für Qualität in der Medizin (ÄZQ): Manual Patienteninformation Empfehlungen zur Erstellung evidenzbasierter Patienteninformationen. Berlin, ÄZQ, 2006. (äzq Schriftenreihe 25)
  19. 19.
    HONcode, [last accessed 3 May 2017]
  20. 20.
    DISCERN, [last accessed 3 May 2017]
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
    ePrivacy [Online]. Available from: [last accessed 13 May 2017]
  23. 23.
    Kühling J, Klar M (2013) Datenschutz bei E-Health—Zeit für grundlegende Reformen. Datenschutz Datensich 37(12):791–795. doi: 10.1007/s11623-013-0328-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Weichert T (2014) Big Data, Gesundheit und der Datenschutz. Datenschutz Datensich 38(12):831–838. doi: 10.1007/s11623-014-0328-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Maddock C, Lewis I, Ahmad K, Sullivan R (2011) Online information needs of cancer patients and their organizations. Ecancermedicalscience 5:235. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2011.235 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Association for Cancer Education 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Hämatologie und OnkologieUniversitätsklinikum JenaJenaGermany
  2. 2.Kliniken des Main Taunus Kreises GmbH Bad Soden, Klinik für Orthopädie und UnfallchirurgieBad SodenGermany

Personalised recommendations