Health Beliefs Associated with the Follow-Up of Pap Smear Abnormalities Among Low-Income Women in Medellín, Colombia
- 87 Downloads
The purpose of the study was to explore variables of the health belief model in relation to the follow-up of abnormal Pap smear among low-income women in Medellín, Colombia. Eight focus groups (62 women) were conducted according to age groups (25–45 and 46–69 years). The data were analyzed using content analysis. The participants perceived themselves as vulnerable, recognized the severity of the disease in terms of both its emotional and physical consequences, perceived the benefits of the follow-up, and mentioned cues to action, such as social support and the support of health entities. Perceived self-efficacy was compromised by health system barriers and by personal barriers, such as placing the needs of their children ahead of their own, fear, neglect, and the pain caused by the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Health education activities aimed at increasing the follow-up of abnormal Pap smears should consider psychological factors.
KeywordsFollow-up Pap smear Health belief model Health education
We thank to the Teaching Support Fund of the Faculty of Public Health and to the Strategy of Sustainability 2013–2014 of the University of Antioquia for financing the study, to Metrosalud for permission to conduct the research, and to the women who participated for sharing their experiences.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The study was approved by the ethics committee of the School of Public Health of Universidad de Antioquia (University of Antioquia).
- 1.GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0 (2013) Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11 [Internet]. International Agency for Research on CancerGoogle Scholar
- 2.ACS (2010) The global economic cost of cancer report. American Cancer SocietyGoogle Scholar
- 3.Organización Panamericana de la Salud (2008) Regional strategy and plan of action for cervical cancer prevention and control in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, D.C.: OPSGoogle Scholar
- 5.Rada C (2006) Editorial. Revista Colombiana de Cancerología 10:83–84Google Scholar
- 6.Ojeda G, Ordonez M, Ochoa LH (2005) Salud Sexual y Reproductiva en Colombia. Encuesta Nacional de Demografia y SaludGoogle Scholar
- 10.Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM (2002) Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice, 3rd edn. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
- 11.Garcés-Palacio IC, Rubio-León DC, Ramos-Jaraba SM (2014) Barreras y facilitadores del sistema de salud relacionadas con el seguimiento de anormalidades citológicas, Medellín-Colombia. Rev Gerenc Polít Salud 13(27):200–211Google Scholar
- 12.Krippendorff K. (2004) Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SageGoogle Scholar
- 16.Garcés-Palacio I, Rubio-Leon D, Scarinci I (2012) Factores asociados con el tamizaje de cáncer de cuello uterino en mujeres de nivel socioeconómico medio y bajo en Bogotá, Colombia. Rev Fac Nac Salud Pública 30(1):7–16Google Scholar
- 17.Calvo A. (2005) Social construction of cervical cancer screening among women in Panama City, Panama: Department of Community and Family Health, College of Public Health, University of South FloridaGoogle Scholar
- 21.Katz ML, Young GS, Reiter PL, Battaglia TA, Wells KJ, Sanders M, Simon M, Dudley DJ, Patierno SR, Paskett ED (2014) Barriers reported among patients with breast and cervical abnormalities in the patient navigation research program: impact on timely care. Womens Health Issues 24(1):e155–e162CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 22.Moreira ED, Oliveira BG, Ferraz FM, Costa S, Costa Filho JO, Karic G (2006) Knowledge and attitudes about human papillomavirus, Pap smears, and cervical cancer among young women in Brazil: implications for health education and prevention. Int J Gynecol Cancer 16(2):599–603CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar