Knowledgeability, Attitude and Behavior of Primary Care Providers Towards Oral Cancer: a Pilot Study
- 246 Downloads
The objective of this study was to assess current knowledgeability, attitudes, and practice behaviors of primary care providers (PCPs) towards oral cancer screening. Applying a cross-sectional design, a 14-question survey was emailed to 307 PCPs practicing at a large, multi-specialty, rurally based healthcare system. Survey data were collected and managed using REDCap and analyzed applying descriptive statistics. A 20 % response rate (n = 61/307) was achieved for survey completion. Approximately 70 % of respondents were physicians, 16 % were nurse practitioners, and 13 % were physician assistants. Nearly 60 % of respondents were family medicine practitioners. Limited training surrounding oral cancer screening during medical training was reported by 64 %. Although 78 % of respondents reported never performing oral cancer screening on patients in their practice, >90 % answered knowledge-based questions correctly. Frequency rate for specialist referral for suspicious lesions by PCPs was 56 % “frequently”. Optimal periodicity for oral cancer screening on all patients selected by respondents was 61 % “annually”, 3 % “every 6 months”, 3 % “every visit”, 2 % “not at all”, and 31 % “unsure”. This study established a baseline surrounding current knowledgeability, practice patterns, and opinions of PCPs towards oral cancer screening at a single, large, regional healthcare system. In the absence of evidence-based support for population-based cancer screening, this study result suggests a need for better integration of oral cancer surveillance into the medical setting, supplemented by education and training with emphasis on assessment of high-risk patients to achieve early detection. Prospectively, larger studies are needed to validate these findings.
KeywordsMouth neoplasms Patient care team Health knowledge, attitudes, practice Healthcare surveys Interdisciplinary health team
The authors thank Cathy Schneider from the Biomedical Informatics Research Center for her assistance with formatting the survey tool and preparation of the data sets for analysis. The authors would also like to thank Dixie Schroeder from Institute for Oral and Systemic Health and Debra Kempf from Division of Education of Marshfield Clinic for their coordination in the project.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
The study was classified as “exempt” under section 45 CFR 46.101(b) (2) by the Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation Institutional Review Board (IRB).
The study described in this article was supported, in part, by a grant from Delta Dental of Wisconsin, funds from Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation (MCRF), Institute for Oral and Systemic Health, Division of Education and Family Health Center of Marshfield.
- 2.National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research. Detecting Oral Cancer: A Guide for Health Care Professionals. Available at http://www.nidcr.nih.gov/oralhealth/Topics/OralCancer/DetectingOralCancer.htm. Accessed 10 February 2016.
- 3.Oral Cancer Foundation. Oral Cancer Facts. Available at http://oralcancerfoundation.org/facts Accessed 12 May 2016.
- 4.Cancer.Net Editorial Board. Oral and Oropharyngeal Cancer: Statistics 1/2015. Available at http://www.cancer.net/cancer-types/oral-and-oropharyngeal-cancer/statistics Accessed 27 April 2016.
- 5.Hashibe M, Brennan P, Chuang SC, Boccia S, Castellsague X, Chen C et al (2009) Interaction between tobacco and alcohol use and the risk of head and neck cancer: pooled analysis in the International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology Consortium. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 18(2):541–550CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 10.Blackwell DL, Lucas JW, Clarke TC (2014) Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: national health interview survey, 2012. Vital Health Stat 10 260:1–161Google Scholar
- 12.Patton LL, Ashe TE, Elter JR, Southerland JH, Strauss RP (2006) Adequacy of training in oral cancer prevention and screening as self-assessed by physicians, nurse practitioners, and dental health professionals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 102(6):758–764CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Spangler JG, George G, Foley KL, Crandall SJ. Tobacco intervention training: current efforts and gaps in US medical schools. JAMA 288(9):1102–1109.Google Scholar
- 15.Olson CM, Burda BU, Beil T, Whitlock EP (2013) Screening for oral cancer: a targeted evidence update for the U.S. Preventive services task force [internet]. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), Rockville, Report No. 13-05186-EF-1. U.S. Preventive Services Task Forced Evidence SynthesisGoogle Scholar