Utility of a Referral Letter to Improve Comprehensibility of Cancer Patients in Palliative Care: a Single-Center Study
- 76 Downloads
In spite of a referral letter as an important document for communicating between physicians, whether it could also be useful as a source of information for patients has not yet established. We included cancer patients in palliative care setting, all of whom completed a standardized questionnaire regarding their opinion concerning the utility of a referral letter as a source of information and its requirements to achieve a better understanding. Completed questionnaires were received from 50 cancer patients. Ninety-four percent of participants agreed that a referral letter could be of great importance for procuring medical information to them. There was only minor divergence among the participants respecting age, gender, or education. Particular requirements were diagnosis, treatment plan, prognosis, list of drugs, and contact data of involved physicians. Additional important topics were laboratory values, alternatives to current therapy, side effects and supportive therapy, and advices regarding lifestyle and naturopathy. The majority of patients also concluded to accept technical terms in doctor’s letters if a glossary supported their comprehension. The majority of patients prefer a concise description of medical information in a referral letter. This form of a letter would boost patients’ involvement and help them transfer medical information to other therapists or relatives.
KeywordsPatient information Patient information needs Cancer Referral letter
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the J.W. Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
There was no funding of this study.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 4.Butzlaff M, Floer B, Isfort J (2003) “Shared decision making”: Der Patient im Mittelpunkt von Gesundheitswesen und praxisalltag? In: Boecken J, Braun B, Schnee M (Hrsg.): Gesundheitsmonitor; BertelsmannGoogle Scholar
- 16.Jones RB, Pearson J, Cawsey AJ, Bental D, Barrett A, White J, White CA, Gilmour WH (2016) Effect of different forms of information produced for cancer patients on their use of the information, social support, and anxiety: randomised trial. BMJ. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38807.571042.68
- 17.Mills ME, Davidson R. Cancer patients’ sources of information: use and quality issues. Psycho-Oncology 2002;11(5):371–378.Google Scholar
- 18.Keinki C, Seilacher E, Ebel M, Ruetters D, Kessler I, Stellamanns J, Rudolph I, Huebner J (2016) Information needs of cancer patients and perception of impact of the disease, of self-efficacy and locus of control. J Cancer Educ. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0860-x
- 19.Ebel MD, Stellamanns J, Keinki C, Rudolph I, Huebner J (2016) Cancer patients and the internet: a survey among German cancer patients. J Cancer Educ. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0945-6
- 20.Ruetters D, Keinki C, Schroth S, Liebl P, Huebner J (2016) Is there evidence for a better health care for cancer patients after a second opinion?—a systematic review. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. doi: 10.1007/s00432-015-2099-7
- 26.Parker SM, Clayton JM, Hancock K, Walder S, Butow PN, Carrick S, Currow D, Ghersi D, Glare P, Hagerty R, Tattersall MH (2007) A systematic review of prognostic/end-of-life communication with adults in the advanced stages of a life-limiting illness: patient/caregiver preferences for the content, style, and timing of information. J Pain Symptom Manag 34(1):81–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Haq R, Heus NA, Dastur D, Leung FH, Leung E, Li B, et al. (2013) Designing a multifaceted survivorship care plan to meet the information and communication needs of breast cancer patients and their family physicians: results of a qualitative pilot study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 13:76CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar