Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Providers’ Experiences with a Melanoma Web-Based Course: a Discussion on Barriers and Intentions

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Primary care visits provide an opportunity for skin examinations with the potential to reduce melanoma mortality. The INFORMED (INternet curriculum FOR Melanoma Early Detection) Group developed a Web-based curriculum to improve primary care providers’ (PCPs’) skin cancer detection skills. This study details feedback obtained from participant focus groups, including the feasibility of implementing in other PCP practices. Practicing PCPs at Henry Ford Health System and Kaiser Permanente Northern California completed the curriculum. Feedback sessions were conducted with standardized questions focusing on four domains: (1) overall impressions of the curriculum, (2) recommendations for improvement, (3) current skin examination practices, and (4) suggestions for increasing skin screening by PCPs. Discussions at each site were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and de-identified. Providers (N = 54) had a positive impression of the Web-based curriculum, with suggestions to provide offline teaching aids and request assistance. Despite having improved confidence in diagnosing malignant lesions, many providers felt a lack of confidence in performing the screening and time constraints affected their current practices, as did institutional constraints. Providers intended to increase discussion with patients about skin cancer. The accessibility, effectiveness, and popularity of the curriculum indicate potential for implementation in the primary care setting. Participating providers noted that institutional barriers remain which must be addressed for successful dissemination and implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Cancer Society (2014) Cancer facts and figures 2014. American Cancer Society, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson RT, Dziak K, McBride J, Camacho F, Hege AC, Torti FM (2004) Demand for continuing medical education programs on cancer care among primary care physicians in North Carolina. N C Med J 65(3):130–135

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Borkan J (1999) Immersion/crystallization. In: Crabtree BF, Miller WL (eds) Doing qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 179–194

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carli P, De Giorgi V, Crocetti E, Caldini L, Ressel C, Giannotti B (2005) Diagnostic and referral accuracy of family doctors in melanoma screening: effect of a short formal training. Eur J Cancer Prev 14(1):51–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cook DA (2007) Web-based learning: pros, cons and controversies. Clin Med (London, England) 7(1):37–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dobbins M, Cockerill R, Barnsley J, Ciliska D (2001) Factors of the innovation, organization, environment, and individual that predict the influence five systematic reviews had on public health decisions. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 17(4):467–478

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Eide MJ, Asgari MM, Fletcher SW, Geller AC, Halpern AC, Shaikh WR, Li L et al (2013) Effects on skills and practice from a web-based skin cancer course for primary care providers. J Am Board Family Med 26(6):648–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Estabrooks CA, Floyd JA, Scott-Findlay S, O’Leary KA, Gushta M (2003) Individual determinants of research utilization: a systematic review. J Adv Nurs 43(5):506–520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Feldman SR, Fleischer AB Jr (2000) Skin examinations and skin cancer prevention counseling by US physicians: a long way to go. J Am Acad Dermatol 43(2 Pt 1):234–237. doi:10.1067/mjd.2000.105559

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Garrido Elustondo S, Garcia Vallejo R, Nogales Aguado P (2002) Continuing education in primary care: the educational needs of its professionals. Aten Primaria 30(6):368–373

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gerbert B, Bronstone A, Wolff M, Maurer T, Berger T, Pantilat S, McPhee SJ (1998) Improving primary care residents’ proficiency in the diagnosis of skin cancer. J Gen Intern Med 13(2):91–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Gerbert B, Maurer T, Berger T, Pantilat S, McPhee SJ, Wolff M, Bronstone A, Caspers N (1996) Primary care physicians as gatekeepers in managed care. Primary care physicians’ and dermatologists’ skills at secondary prevention of skin cancer. Arch Dermatol 132(9):1030–1038

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gerbert B, Bronstone A, Maurer T, Berger T, McPhee SJ, Caspers N (2002) The effectiveness of an internet-based tutorial in improving primary care physicians’ skin cancer triage skills. J Cancer Educ 17(1):7–11

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Goulart JM, Quigley EA, Dusza S, Jewell ST, Alexander G, Asgari MM, Eide MJ et al (2011) Skin cancer education for primary care physicians: a systematic review of published evaluated interventions. J Gen Intern Med 26(9):1027–1035

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Katalinic A, Waldmann A, Weinstock MA, Geller AC, Eisemann N, Greinert R, Volkmer B, Breitbart E (2012) Does skin cancer screening save lives?: an observational study comparing trends in melanoma mortality in regions with and without screening. Cancer 118(21):5395–5402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kirsner RS, Muhkerjee S, Federman DG (1999) Skin cancer screening in primary care: prevalence and barriers. J Am Acad Dermatol 41(4):564–566

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lasser KE, Ayanian JZ, Fletcher RH, Del Vecchio Good M-J (2008) Barriers to colorectal cancer screening in community health centers: a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract 9:15

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Lobb R, Colditz GA (2013) Implementation science and its application to population health. Annu Rev Public Health 34:235–251

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Martinez-Gutierrez J, Jhingan E, Angulo A, Jimenez R, Thompson B, Coronado GD (2013) Cancer screening at a federally qualified health center: a qualitative study on organizational challenges in the era of the patient-centered medical home. J Immigr Minor Health 15(5):993–1000

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Milat AJ, King L, Bauman AE, Redman S (2013) The concept of scalability: increasing the scale and potential adoption of health promotion interventions into policy and practice. Health Promot Int 28(3):285–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rabin BA, Nehl E, Elliott T, Deshpande AD, Brownson RC, Glanz K (2010) Individual and setting level predictors of the implementation of a skin cancer prevention program: a multilevel analysis. Implement Sci 5:40

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Rohrbach LA, Grana R, Sussman S, Valente TW (2006) Type II translation: transporting prevention interventions from research to real-world settings. Evaluation Health Professions 29(3):302–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2015) Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 65(1):5–29. doi:10.3322/caac.21254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. US Department of Health and Human Services (2014) The surgeon general’s call to action to prevent skin cancer. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General

  25. Wagner EH, Greene SM, Hart G, Field TS, Fletcher S, Geiger AM, Herrinton LJ et al. (2005) Building a research consortium of large health systems: the Cancer Research Network. J Natl Cancer Institute. Monographs (35):3-11. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgi032

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was developed by the INFORMED (Internet Course of Melanoma Early Detection) Group, which, in addition to the authors listed, includes Waqas Shaikh, MD MPH; Lingling Li, PhD; Stephen Dusza, DrPH; Ashfaq Marghoob, MD; Elizabeth Quigley, MD; Jacqueline M. Goulart, MD; Shoshana Landow, MD; Michelle Groesbeck, BS; Richard Krajenta, MS; Kimberly Marcolivio, MEd; Monica Sokil, RD; and E. Margaret Warton, MPH.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declared that they have no competing interests.

Funding Sources

This study was funded by a Team Science Award from the Melanoma Research Alliance, with the National Cancer Institute-supported HMO Cancer Research Network (U24 CA171524) and National Cancer Institute-mentored Training for Dissemination and Implementation Research (R25 CA171994). The sponsors had no role in the design and conduct of the study; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; or in the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melody J. Eide.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, A.J., Eide, M.J., Alexander, G.L. et al. Providers’ Experiences with a Melanoma Web-Based Course: a Discussion on Barriers and Intentions. J Canc Educ 32, 272–279 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-015-0910-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-015-0910-4

Keywords

Navigation