Skip to main content

Follow-up Care Education and Information: Identifying Cancer Survivors in Need of More Guidance

Journal of Cancer Education volume 31, pages 63–69 (2016)Cite this article

Abstract

Cancer survivors engage in cancer screenings and protective health behaviors at suboptimal rates despite their increased risk for future illness. Survivorship care plans and other educational strategies to prepare cancer survivors to adopt engaged roles in managing long-term follow-up care and health risks are needed. In a sample of cancer survivors, we identified patient characteristics and psychosocial predictors associated with increased follow-up care informational needs. Cross-sectional surveys were administered to early-stage breast and prostate survivors (N = 278; 68 % breast) at least 2 years post treatment from four community hospital programs in New Jersey between May 2012 and July 2013. Patient demographics, medical history, psychosocial characteristics (i.e., worries about the future, fear of disease recurrence, and patient activation), and perceptions of oncology and primary care were assessed. African-American survivors (AOR = 2.69, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.27–5.68) and survivors with higher comorbidity (AOR = 1.16, CI 1.01-1.33) were more likely to want additional information to guide follow-up care. Adjusting for race and comorbidities, survivors who wanted more information to guide their follow-up care reported greater worries about the future (p < 0.05) and fears about disease recurrence (p < 0.05) compared to those who did not want additional information. Results emphasize the need to develop cancer survivorship educational strategies that are both responsive to the needs of specific populations (e.g., African-American survivors and patients with multiple comorbidities) and the psychosocial profiles that motivate requests for more extensive follow-up guidance.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. DeSantis CE, Lin CC, Mariotto AB, et al (2014) Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2014. CA: A Cancer J Clin

  2. de Moor JS, Mariotto AB, Parry C, et al (2013) Cancer survivors in the United States: prevalence across the survivorship trajectory and implications for care. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 22(4):561–570

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Underwood JM, Townsend JS, Stewart SL, et al (2012) Surveillance of demographic characteristics and health behaviors among adult cancer survivors—behavioral risk factor surveillance system, United States, 2009. MMWR Surveill Summ 61(Suppl 1):1–23

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Earle CC, Neville BA (2004) Under use of necessary care among cancer survivors. Cancer 101(8):1712–1719

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Parry C, Kent EE, Mariotto AB, et al (2011) Cancer survivors: a booming population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 20(10):1996–2005

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hewitt ME, Greenfield S, Stovall E, et al (2006) From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. National Academies Press. xxv, Washington, D.C., p xxv, 506 p

    Google Scholar 

  7. Earle CC, Ganz PA (2012) Cancer survivorship care: don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good. J Clin Oncol 30(30):3764–3768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Oeffinger KC, McCabe MS (2006) Models for delivering survivorship care. J Clin Oncol 24(32):5117–5124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hudson SV, Miller SM, Hemler J, et al (2012) Adult cancer survivors discuss follow-up in primary care: ‘not what I want, but maybe what I need’. Ann Fam Med 10(5):418–427

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Parry C, Kent EE, Forsythe LP, et al (2013) Can’t see the forest for the care plan: a call to revisit the context of care planning. J Clin Oncol 31(21):2651–2653

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Burg MA, Lopez ED, Dailey A, et al (2009) The potential of survivorship care plans in primary care follow-up of minority breast cancer patients. J Gen Intern Med 24(2):467–471

    PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hewitt ME, Bamundo A, Day R, et al (2007) Perspectives on post-treatment cancer care: qualitative research with survivors, nurses, and physicians. J Clin Oncol 25(16):2270–2273

  13. Miller SM (1995) Monitoring versus blunting styles of coping with cancer influence the information patients want and need about their disease. Implications for cancer screening and management. Cancer 76(2):167–177

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, et al (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hibbard JH, Mahoney ER, Stockard J, et al (2005) Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure. Health Serv Res 40(6p1):1918–1930

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Flocke SA, Miller WL, Crabtree BF (2002) Relationships between physician practice style, patient satisfaction, and attributes of primary care. J Fam Pract 51(10):835–840

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ashing-Giwa K, Tapp C, Brown S, et al (2013) Are survivorship care plans responsive to African-American breast cancer survivors?: voices of survivors and advocates. J Cancer Surviv 7(3):283–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kantipur M et al (2009) Transitioning to breast cancer survivorship: perspectives of patients, cancer specialists, and primary care providers. J Gen Intern Med 24(2):459–466

    Google Scholar 

  19. Campbell LC, Keefe FJ, Scipio C, et al (2007) Facilitating research participation and improving quality of life for African American prostate cancer survivors and their intimate partners. Cancer 109(S2):414–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Beckjord EB, Arora NK, McLaughlin W, et al (2008) Health-related information needs in a large and diverse sample of adult cancer survivors: implications for cancer care. J Cancer Surviv 2(3):179–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Konety BR, Cowan JE, Carroll PR (2008) Patterns of primary and secondary therapy for prostate cancer in elderly men: analysis of data from CaPSURE< sup>®</sup> J Urol 179(5):1797–1803

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yancik R, Wesley MN, Ries LA, et al (2001) Effect of age and comorbidity in postmenopausal breast cancer patients aged 55 years and older. JAMA 285(7):885–892

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pal SK, Hurria A (2010) Impact of age, sex, and comorbidity on cancer therapy and disease progression. J Clin Oncol 28(26):4086–4093

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported through grants awarded to Dr. Hudson (K01 CA131500, R03 CA154063) and the Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey (P30 CA06927) from the National Cancer Institute. Ms. O’Malley was supported by a Doctoral Training Grant in Oncology Social Work (DSW 13-279-01) from the American Cancer Society.

Conflict of Interest

None of the authors have any potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, New Brunswick, NJ, USA

    Denalee M. O’Malley, Shawna V. Hudson, Pamela A. Ohman-Strickland, Alicja Bator, Heather S. Lee & Daniel A. Gundersen

  2. Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 1 World’s Fair Drive, Suite 1502, Somerset, NJ, 08873, USA

    Denalee M. O’Malley, Shawna V. Hudson, Pamela A. Ohman-Strickland, Alicja Bator, Heather S. Lee & Daniel A. Gundersen

  3. Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA

    Shawna V. Hudson & Pamela A. Ohman-Strickland

  4. Biometrics Division, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA

    Pamela A. Ohman-Strickland

  5. Fox Chase Cancer Center/Temple Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Suzanne M. Miller

  6. Rutgers, School of Social Work, New Brunswick, NJ, USA

    Denalee M. O’Malley

Authors
  1. Denalee M. O’Malley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shawna V. Hudson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pamela A. Ohman-Strickland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alicja Bator
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Heather S. Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Daniel A. Gundersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Suzanne M. Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Denalee M. O’Malley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

O’Malley, D.M., Hudson, S.V., Ohman-Strickland, P.A. et al. Follow-up Care Education and Information: Identifying Cancer Survivors in Need of More Guidance. J Canc Educ 31, 63–69 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-014-0775-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-014-0775-y

Keywords

  • Follow-up
  • Survivorship
  • Breast cancer
  • Prostate cancer
  • Informational needs