Skip to main content
Log in

Tangled in the Breast Cancer Web: an Evaluation of the Usage of Web-Based Information Resources by Breast Cancer Patients

Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article


This study describes Internet use by breast cancer patients highlighting search patterns and examining the impact of web-based information on the clinical encounter. From September 2011 to January 2012, breast cancer patients at a cancer center completed a survey. Answers were closed and open-ended. Eighty-one patients were approached and 56 completed the survey. Forty-five (80 %) respondents used the Internet and 32 (71 %) searched for breast cancer information. All used Google as their principal search engine. To evaluate quality, 47 % referred to author credentials and 41 % examined references. Most sought information with respect to treatment or prognosis. Eighty percent felt that the information increased their knowledge and influenced treatment decision making for 53 %. This study highlights search patterns and factors used by breast cancer patients in seeking web-based information. Physicians must appreciate that patients use the Internet and address discrepancies between information sought and that which is available.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions


  1. Diaz JA, Griffith RA, Ng JJ, Reinert SE, Friedmann PD, Moulton AW (2002) Patients' use of the Internet for medical information. J Gen Intern Med 17:180–185

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hesse BW, Nelson DE, Kreps GL, Croyle RT, Arora NK, Rimer BK, Viswanath K (2005) Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first Health Information National Trends Survey. Arch Intern Med 165:2618–2624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Harris Interactive (2010) “Cyberchrondriacs” on the rise? Accessed 16 Jan 2013

  4. Ahmad F, Hudak PL, Bercovitz K, Hollenberg E, Levinson W (2006) Are physicians ready for patients with Internet-based health information? J Med Internet Res 8:e22

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fogel J, Albert SM, Schnabel F, Ditkoff BA, Neugut AI (2002) Use of the Internet by women with breast cancer. J Med Internet Res 4:E9

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Quinn EM, Corrigan MA, McHugh SM, Murphy D, O'Mullane J, Hill AD, Redmond HP (2012) Breast cancer information on the internet: analysis of accessibility and accuracy. Breast 21(4):514–517. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2012.01.020

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dickerson SS, Reinhart A, Boemhke M, Akhu-Zaheya L (2011) Cancer as a problem to be solved: internet use and provider communication by men with cancer. Comput Inform Nurs 29:388–395

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McMullan M (2006) Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: how this affects the patient-health professional relationship. Patient Educ Couns 63:24–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. van de Poll-Franse LV, van Eenbergen MC (2008) Internet use by cancer survivors: current use and future wishes. Support Care Cancer 16:1189–1195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Castleton K, Fong T, Wang-Gillam A, Waqar MA, Jeffe DB, Kehlenbrink L, Gao F, Govindan R (2011) A survey of Internet utilization among patients with cancer. Support Care Cancer 19:1183–1190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McHugh SM, Corrigan M, Morney N, Sheikh A, Lehane E, Hill AD (2011) A quantitative assessment of changing trends in Internet usage for cancer information. World J Surg 35:253–257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ziebland S, Chapple A, Dumelow C, Evans J, Prinjha S, Rozmovits L (2004) How the internet affects patients' experience of cancer: a qualitative study. BMJ 328:564

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA (1997) Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor–Let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA 277:1244–1245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bader SA, Braude RM (1998) “Patient informatics”: creating new partnerships in medical decision making. Acad Med 73:408–411

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hoffman-Goetz L, Clarke JN (2000) Quality of breast cancer sites on the World Wide Web. Can J Public Health 91:281–284

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Berland GK, Elliott MN, Morales LS, Algazy JI, Kravitz RL, Broder MS, Kanouse DE, Munoz JA, Puyol JA, Lara M, Watkins KE, Yang H, McGlynn EA (2001) Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. JAMA 285:2612–2621

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Eysenbach G (2003) The impact of the Internet on cancer outcomes. CA Cancer J Clin 53:356–371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Eysenbach G, Kohler C (2002) How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. BMJ 324:573–577

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hollander S, Lanier D (2001) The physician-patient relationship in an electronic environment: a regional snapshot. Bull Med Libr Assoc 89:397–399

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pereira JL, Koski S, Hanson J, Bruera ED, Mackey JR (2000) Internet usage among women with breast cancer: an exploratory study. Clin Breast Cancer 1:148–153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Harris I (2003) What does “The discovery of grounded theory” have to say to medical education? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 8:49–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fraenkel J, Wallen N (2008) How to design and evaluate research in education, 7th edn. MacGraw Hill, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  23. Satterlund MJ, McCaul KD, Sandgren AK (2003) Information gathering over time by breast cancer patients. J Med Internet Res 5:e15

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Metz JM, Devine P, DeNittis A, Jones H, Hampshire M, Goldwein J, Whittington R (2003) A multi-institutional study of Internet utilization by radiation oncology patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 56:1201–1205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Meric F, Bernstam EV, Mirza NQ, Hunt KK, Ames FC, Ross MI, Kuerer HM, Pollock RE, Musen MA, Singletary SE (2002) Breast cancer on the world wide web: cross sectional survey of quality of information and popularity of websites. BMJ 324:577–581

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang L, Wang J, Wang M, Liang Y, Xu D (2011) Use experience evaluation of Google search for obtaining medical knowledge: a case study. Int J Data Min Bioinforma 5:626–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jadad AR (2004) A view from the Internet age: let's build a health system that meets the needs of the next generation. CMAJ 171:1457–1458

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R (1999) DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Commun Health 53:105–111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Deshpande A, Jadad AR (2009) Trying to measure the quality of health information on the internet: is it time to move on? J Rheumatol 36:1–3

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Health on the Net Foundation (2004) Health on the net (HON) foundation code of conduct for medical and health websites

  31. Abbott VP (2000) Web page quality: can we measure it and what do we find? A report of exploratory findings. J Public Health Med 22:191–197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Winker MA, Flanagin A, Chi-Lum B, White J, Andrews K, Kennett RL, DeAngelis CD, Musacchio RA (2000) Guidelines for medical and health information sites on the internet: principles governing AMA web sites. American Medical Association. JAMA 283:1600–1606

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bylund CL, D'Agostino TA, Ostroff J, Heerdt A, Li Y, Dickler M (2012) Exposure to and intention to discuss cancer-related internet information among patients with breast cancer. J Oncol Pract 8:40–45

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Nagler RH, Gray SW, Romantan A, Kelly BJ, DeMichele A, Armstrong K, Schwartz JS, Hornik RC (2010) Differences in information seeking among breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer patients: results from a population-based survey. Patient Educ Couns 81(Suppl):S54–S62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Nagler RH, Romantan A, Kelly BJ, Stevens RS, Gray SW, Hull SJ, Ramirez AS, Hornik RC (2010) How do cancer patients navigate the public information environment? Understanding patterns and motivations for movement among information sources. J Cancer Educ 25:360–370

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Murray A, Sharpe A (2013) Human Capital and Productivity in British Columbia. Accessed 16 Jan 2013

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paris-Ann Ingledew.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nguyen, S.K.A., Ingledew, PA. Tangled in the Breast Cancer Web: an Evaluation of the Usage of Web-Based Information Resources by Breast Cancer Patients. J Canc Educ 28, 662–668 (2013).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: