Skip to main content

Survivorship Clinic Group Educational Sessions: Adoption, Acceptance, and Attendance

Abstract

The number of breast cancer survivors now exceeds 2.5 million in the USA. In the near future, it is likely that existing systems will not be sufficient to provide follow-up care and services for all these patients. Because survivors have many concerns in common and providers may not have enough time to address them individually, group educational sessions (GES) provide an opportunity to inform patients of current breast cancer-related health issues, treatment updates, and follow-up guidelines in an efficient and structured environment. At the University of California San Francisco Breast Care Center, we implemented a GES for patients referred into the Survivorship Clinic. To improve content and convenience, patients were asked at the end of each session to complete a survey measuring their satisfaction with the GES. Clinic staff tracked GES attendance, reasons for declining participation in the GES, and utilization of the Survivorship Clinic for follow-up care. Of the 381 patients referred to the Survivorship Clinic, 177 patients have attended the GES, and 204 ultimately have not attended the GES. Eighty four of the 177 patients who attended completed a survey at the end of the GES. Ninety-five percent of these patients agreed or somewhat agreed that the information presented was clear and understandable. Eighty-five percent of patients agreed or somewhat agreed that they learned about resources for recovery. Utilization of follow-up appointments within the Survivorship Clinic was significantly higher among those who attended the GES compared to those who did not attend. Overall, the GES allows for efficient patient education, and evaluation of the GES leads to new innovations to improve survivorship care.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Waldron W, et al. (editors) (1975–2007) SEER cancer statistics review. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2007/. Accessed 1 March 2012

  2. Richardson A, Addington-Hall J, Amir Z, Foster C, Stark D, Armes J, Brearley SG, Hodges L, Hook J, Jarrett N, Stamataki Z, Scott I, Walker J, Ziegler L, Sharpe M (2011) Knowledge, ignorance and priorities for research in key areas of cancer survivorship: findings from a scoping review. Br J Cancer 105:S82–S94. doi:10.1038/bjc.2011.425

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ganz P, Kwan L, Stanton A, Bower E, Belin T (2011) Physical and psychosocial recovery in the year after primary treatment of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 29(9):1101–1109

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hudson MM, Landier W, Ganz P (2011) Impact of survivorship-based research on defining clinical care guidelines. Cancer Epidemiol, Biomarkers and Prev 20:2085–2092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bober SL, Recklitis CJ, Campbell EG, Park ER, Kutner JS, Najita JS et al (2009) Caring for cancer survivors: a survey of primary care physicians. Cancer 115(18 Suppl):4409–4418

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Potosky AL, Han PKJ, Rowland J, Klabunde CN, Smith T, Aziz N, Earle C, Ayanian JZ, Ganz PA, Stefanek M (2011) Differences between primary care physicians’ and oncologists’ knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding the care of cancer survivors. J of Gen Internal Med 26(12):1403–1410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Calzone KA, Prindiville SA, Jourkiv O, Jenkins J, DeCarvalho M, Wallerstedt DB et al (2005) Randomized comparison of group versus individual genetic education and counseling for familial breast and/or ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 23(15):3455–3464

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jones J, Cheng T, Jackman M, Walton T, Haines S, Rodin G, Catton P (2011) Getting back on track: evaluation of a brief group psychoeducation intervention for women completing primary treatment for breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology. doi:10.1002/pon.2060

  9. Park JH, Bae SH, Jung YS, Kim KS (2012) Quality of life and symptom experience in breast cancer survivors after participating in a psychoeducational support program: a pilot study. Cancer Nursing 35(1):E34–E41

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Snyder LA, Soballe DB, Lahl LL, Nehrebecky ME, Soballe PW, Klein PM (2003) Development of the breast cancer education and risk assessment program. Oncology Nursing Forum 30(5):803–808

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mar Fan HG, Houédé-Tchen N, Yi Q, Chemerynsky I, Downie F, Sabate K, Tannock I (2005) Fatigue, menopausal symptoms, and cognitive function in women after adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: 1- and 2-year follow-up of a prospective controlled study. JCO 31(23):8025–8032

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dorval M, Maunsell E, Deschenes L, Brisson J, Masse B (1998) Long-term quality of life after breast cancer: comparison of 8-year survivors with population controls. JCO 16(2):487–494

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yoon J, Malin JL, Tao ML, Tisnado DM, Adams JL, Timmer MJ, Ganz PA, Kahn KL (2008) Symptoms after breast cancer treatment: are they influenced by patient characteristics? Breast Cancer Res and Treat 108:153–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vivar CG, McQueen A (2005) Informational and emotional needs of long-term survivors of breast cancer. J Adv Nurs 51(5):520–528

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle Melisko.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wheelock, A., Mihalis, E., Hamolsky, D. et al. Survivorship Clinic Group Educational Sessions: Adoption, Acceptance, and Attendance. J Canc Educ 28, 79–83 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-013-0452-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-013-0452-6

Keywords

  • Appointments and schedules
  • Educational models
  • Survivors
  • Breast neoplasms