Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Relative Quality of Internet-Derived Gastrointestinal Cancer Information

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Internet-derived health care information is increasingly accessed by patients, yet its quality and accuracy is variable and unregulated. The aim of this study was to assess the information available regarding common gastrointestinal cancers via three internet search engines (Google, Yahoo and Bing). The top 30 websites for each of the terms: oesophageal, gastric, pancreatic, colon and rectal cancer were evaluated (University of Michigan Consumer Health Website Checklist) and scored [−80 (poor) to 90 (excellent)]. The median score was 53 (−7 to 81) and was significantly higher for oesophageal (61) and pancreatic (65) cancer websites, compared with gastric (49), colon (48) and rectal cancer (50) (p = 0.014). Median scores related to charitable organisations were significantly better than academic, commercial, news agency, care provider, layperson and medical information websites collectively (79 vs. 42, p < 0.0001). Overall quality of internet-derived gastrointestinal cancer information remains poor and patients and clinicians should be aware.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson PF, Allee N, Grove S, Hill S (1999) The University of Michigan Consumer Health Website Evaulation Checklist. www-personal.umich.edu/∼pfa/mlaguide/free/webeval.pdf. Accessed 16 May 2012

  2. Bader JL, Theofanos MF (2003) Searching for cancer information on the internet: analyzing natural language search queries. J Med Internet Res 5(4):e31. doi:10.2196/jmir.5.4.e31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Breckons M, Jones R, Morris J, Richardson J (2008) What do evaluation instruments tell us about the quality of complementary medicine information on the internet? J Med Internet Res 10(1):e3. doi:10.2196/jmir.961

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Castleton K, Fong T, Wang-Gillam A, Waqar MA, Jeffe DB, Kehlenbrink L, Gao F, Govindan R (2011) A survey of Internet utilization among patients with cancer. Support Care Cancer 19(8):1183–1190. doi:10.1007/s00520-010-0935-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Eysenbach G, Kohler Ch (2003) What is the prevalence of health-related searches on the World Wide Web? Qualitative and quantitative analysis of search engine queries on the internet. AMIA Annu Symp Proc:225–229

  6. Goto Y, Sekine I, Sekiguchi H, Yamada K, Nokihara H, Yamamoto N, Kunitoh H, Ohe Y, Tamura T (2009) Differences in the quality of information on the internet about lung cancer between the United States and Japan. J Thorac Oncol 4(7):829–833. doi:10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181a76fe1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Health Improvement Institute and Consumer Reports Web Watch. 2003. A report on the evaluation of criteria sets for assessing health web sites. http://www.consumerwebwatch.org/dynamic/health-report-assessing-health-sites-abstract.cfm. Accessed 16 May 2012

  8. McHugh SM, Corrigan M, Morney N, Sheikh A, Lehane E, Hill AD (2011) A quantitative assessment of changing trends in internet usage for cancer information. World J Surg 35(2):253–257. doi:10.1007/s00268-010-0830-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Meric F, Bernstam EV, Mirza NQ, Hunt KK, Ames FC, Ross MI, Kuerer HM, Pollock RE, Musen MA, Singletary SE (2002) Breast cancer on the world wide web: cross sectional survey of quality of information and popularity of websites. BMJ 324(7337):577–581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Moran M, Oliver CW (2007) Content and design of patient-targeted websites in orthopaedic surgery: the example of total hip replacement. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 89:773–776. doi:10.1308/003588407X209293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sajid MS, Iftikhar M, Monteiro RS, Miles AF, Woods WG, Baig MK (2008) Internet information on colorectal cancer: commercialization and lack of quality control. Colorectal Dis 10(4):352–356. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01316.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. SearchEngineWatch.com. 2012. Search Engine Watch. http://searchenginewatch.com. Accessed 16 May 2012

  13. UK Cancer Research. 2012. Cancer research UK. http://www.cancerresearchuk.org. Accessed 16 May 2012

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Upper GI Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK, CF14 4XW

    David S. Y. Chan, Anita Willicombe, Thomas D. Reid, Ceri Beaton, I. Llion Davies & Wyn G. Lewis

  2. Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK

    David Arnold & James Ward

Authors
  1. David S. Y. Chan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anita Willicombe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thomas D. Reid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ceri Beaton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. David Arnold
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. James Ward
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. I. Llion Davies
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Wyn G. Lewis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David S. Y. Chan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chan, D.S.Y., Willicombe, A., Reid, T.D. et al. Relative Quality of Internet-Derived Gastrointestinal Cancer Information. J Canc Educ 27, 676–679 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-012-0408-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-012-0408-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation