Relative Quality of Internet-Derived Gastrointestinal Cancer Information
- 208 Downloads
Internet-derived health care information is increasingly accessed by patients, yet its quality and accuracy is variable and unregulated. The aim of this study was to assess the information available regarding common gastrointestinal cancers via three internet search engines (Google, Yahoo and Bing). The top 30 websites for each of the terms: oesophageal, gastric, pancreatic, colon and rectal cancer were evaluated (University of Michigan Consumer Health Website Checklist) and scored [−80 (poor) to 90 (excellent)]. The median score was 53 (−7 to 81) and was significantly higher for oesophageal (61) and pancreatic (65) cancer websites, compared with gastric (49), colon (48) and rectal cancer (50) (p = 0.014). Median scores related to charitable organisations were significantly better than academic, commercial, news agency, care provider, layperson and medical information websites collectively (79 vs. 42, p < 0.0001). Overall quality of internet-derived gastrointestinal cancer information remains poor and patients and clinicians should be aware.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
- 1.Anderson PF, Allee N, Grove S, Hill S (1999) The University of Michigan Consumer Health Website Evaulation Checklist. www-personal.umich.edu/∼pfa/mlaguide/free/webeval.pdf. Accessed 16 May 2012
- 5.Eysenbach G, Kohler Ch (2003) What is the prevalence of health-related searches on the World Wide Web? Qualitative and quantitative analysis of search engine queries on the internet. AMIA Annu Symp Proc:225–229Google Scholar
- 6.Goto Y, Sekine I, Sekiguchi H, Yamada K, Nokihara H, Yamamoto N, Kunitoh H, Ohe Y, Tamura T (2009) Differences in the quality of information on the internet about lung cancer between the United States and Japan. J Thorac Oncol 4(7):829–833. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181a76fe1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Health Improvement Institute and Consumer Reports Web Watch. 2003. A report on the evaluation of criteria sets for assessing health web sites. http://www.consumerwebwatch.org/dynamic/health-report-assessing-health-sites-abstract.cfm. Accessed 16 May 2012
- 12.SearchEngineWatch.com. 2012. Search Engine Watch. http://searchenginewatch.com. Accessed 16 May 2012
- 13.UK Cancer Research. 2012. Cancer research UK. http://www.cancerresearchuk.org. Accessed 16 May 2012