Advertisement

Journal of Cancer Education

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 687–694 | Cite as

Colorectal Cancer Screening Practices in Alabama: A Survey of Primary Care Physicians

  • Kathryn Chapman
  • Keith NichollsEmail author
  • Margaret M. Sullivan
  • Susan Crutchfield
  • Thomas Shaw
  • Allen Perkins
  • Eddie Reed
Article

Abstract

In order to inform efforts to increase screening rates for colorectal cancer (CRC), we conducted a survey of Alabama primary care physicians regarding CRC screening practices, educational preferences, and perceptions of obstacles to screening. A mail survey of 2,378 Alabama physicians in Family Medicine, Internal Medicine, and Obstetrics & Gynecology was conducted. Many physicians are not fully up-to-date with current CRC screening practices that could improve patient compliance with screening guidelines. One example is the potential use of high-sensitivity stool tests, such as the fecal immunochemical test, instead of the no longer recommended low-sensitivity guaiac fecal occult blood tests. In addition, enhanced multimedia and web-based approaches to educating physicians and patients could be more fully utilized. Further, greater use of health information technologies could increase screening rates. Enhancing primary care physicians' knowledge of screening modalities and increasing their use of electronic technology could significantly improve colorectal cancer screening outcomes.

Keywords

Colorectal cancer Fecal immunochemical test Alabama Low- and high-sensitivity guaiac fecal occult blood tests 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This journal article was supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Cooperative agreement number U58/DP002055. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official views of the CDC.

Conflicts of Interest

None of the authors of this article has any financial conflict of interest relevant to the project or any other conflicts that would require disclosure.

References

  1. 1.
    American Cancer Society (2012) Cancer facts & figures 2012. American Cancer Society, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    American Cancer Society (2011) Colorectal cancer facts & figures 2011-2013. American Cancer Society, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    American Cancer Society (2011) Cancer prevention & early detection facts & figures 2011. American Cancer Society, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Joseph DA, DeGroff AS, Hayes NS, Wong FL, Plescia M (2011) The colorectal cancer control program: partnering to increase population level screening. Gastrointest Endosc 73(3):429–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kellerman SE, Herold J (2001) Physician response to surveys, a review of the literature. Am J Prev Med 20(1):61–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    VanGeest J, Johnson T, Welch V (2007) Methodologies for improving response rates in surveys of physicians. Eval Health Prof 30(4):303–321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    O'Neill L, Kuder J (2005) Explaining variation in physician practice patterns and their propensities to recommend services. Medical Care Research & Review [serial online] 62(3):339–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yabroff K, Klabunde C, Taplin S et al (2011) Are physicians' recommendations for colorectal cancer screening guideline consistent? J Gen Intern Med 26(2):177–184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Klabunde C, Frame P, Meadow A, Jones E, Nadel M, Vernon S (2003) A national survey of primary care physicians' colorectal cancer screening recommendations and practices. Prev Med 36(3):352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Beydoun HA, Beydoun MA (2008) Predictors of colorectal cancer screening behaviors among average-risk older adults in the United States. Cancer Causes Control 19(4):339–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gennarelli M, Jandorf L, Cromwell C, Valdimarsdottir H, Redd W, Itzkowitz S (2005) Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: inadequate knowledge by physicians. Mt Sinai J Med 72(1):36–44PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    United States Preventive Services Task Force, October (2008) Screening for colorectal cancer: clinical summary of U.S. preventive services task force recommendation. AHRQ Publication No. 08-05124-EF-4, http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/ uspstf08/colocancer/colosum.htm. Accessed December 10, 2011
  13. 13.
    Marinopoulos SS, Dorman T, Ratanawongsa N, Wilson LM, Ashar BH, Magaziner JL et al (2007) Effectiveness of continuing medical education. Evidence report/technology assessment, No. 149, AHRQ Publication No. 07-E006. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, RockvilleGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hoffman RM, Ryne RL, Helitzer DL, Stone SN, Sussman L, Bruggeman EE, Viera R, Warner TD (2011) Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: physician and general population perspectives, New Mexico, 2006. Prev Chronic Dis 8(2):A35PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hoffman RM, Steel S, Yee EF, Massie L, Schrader RM, Murata GH (2010) Colorectal cancer screening adherence is higher with fecal immunochemical tests than guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests: a randomized, controlled trial. Prev Med 50(5–6):297–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Whitlock EP, Lin JS, Liles E, Beil TL, Fu R (2008) Screening for colorectal cancer: a targeted, updated systematic review for the U.S. preventive services task force. Ann Intern Med 149(9):638–658PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Post DM, Katz ML, Tatum C, Dickinson SL, Lemeshow S, Paskett ED (2008) Determinants of colorectal cancer screening in primary care. J Cancer Educ 23(4):241–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fagerlin A, Sepucha KR, Couper MP, Levin CA, Singer E, Zikmund-Fisher BJ (2010) Patients' knowledge about 9 common health conditions: the DECISIONS survey. Med Decis Making 30(5 Suppl):35S–52SPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nguyen BH, McPhee SJ, Stewart SL, Doan HT, Hiep T (2010) Effectiveness of a controlled trial to promote colorectal cancer screening in Vietnamese Americans. Am J Public Health 100(5):870–876PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Makoul G, Cameron KA, Baker DW, Francis FL, Scholtens D, Wolf MS (2009) A multimedia patient education program on colorectal cancer screening increases knowledge and willingness to consider screening among Hispanic/Latino patients. Patient Educ Couns 76(2):220–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hassinger JP, Holubar SD, Pendlimari R, Dozois EJ, Larson DW, Cima RR (2010) Effectiveness of a multimedia-based educational intervention for improving colon cancer literacy in screening colonoscopy patients. Dis Colon Rectum 53(9):1301–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Senore C, Malila N, Minozzi S, Armaroli P (2010) How to enhance physician and public acceptance and utilization of colon cancer screening recommendations. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 24(4):509–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ling BS, Schoen RE, Trauth JM, Wahed AS, Eury T, Simak DM et al (2009) Physicians encouraging colorectal screening, a randomized controlled trial of enhanced office and patient management on compliance with colorectal cancer screening. Arch Intern Med 169(1):47–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yabroff K, Zapka J, Klabunde C, Yuan G et al (2011) Systems strategies to support cancer screening in U.S. primary care practices. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 20(12):2471–2479PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bramble JD, Galt KA, Siracuse MV, Abbott AA, Drincic A, Paschal KA, Fuji KT (2010) The relationship between physician practice characteristics and physician adoption of electronic health records. Health Care Manage Rev 35(1):55–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathryn Chapman
    • 4
  • Keith Nicholls
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Margaret M. Sullivan
    • 1
  • Susan Crutchfield
    • 1
  • Thomas Shaw
    • 2
  • Allen Perkins
    • 5
  • Eddie Reed
    • 1
  1. 1.USA Mitchell Cancer InstituteUniversity of South AlabamaMobileUSA
  2. 2.USA Polling GroupUniversity of South AlabamaMobileUSA
  3. 3.Political Science DepartmentUniversity of South AlabamaMobileUSA
  4. 4.Cancer Prevention Program, Alabama FITWAY Colorectal Cancer Prevention Program, Bureau of Family Health ServicesAlabama Department of Public HealthMontgomeryUSA
  5. 5.Department of Family MedicineUniversity of South AlabamaMobileUSA

Personalised recommendations