Skip to main content

Determinants of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination Intent Among Three Canadian Target Groups

Journal of Cancer Education volume 27, pages 717–724 (2012)Cite this article

Abstract

To increase the uptake of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, understanding the determinants of vaccination intentions for various groups is important. Three studies examining theoretical determinants of college-aged women’s (study 1: n = 286), parents’ of daughters (study 2: n = 230) and parents’ of sons (study 3: n = 137) HPV vaccination intentions were conducted. Participants completed questionnaires assessing constructs of protection motivation theory (PMT) and the theory of planned behaviour (TPB). Results indicate that both PMT and TPB constructs predict intentions for the different groups. Focusing on the response efficacy of the vaccine rather than the severity of contracting HPV may be an effective way to increase vaccination intentions among all groups. Focusing on vulnerability to HPV may only increase intentions among college-aged women and parents of sons, and increasing self-efficacy may only increase intentions among college-aged women and parents of daughters. Findings have implications for understanding differences among groups considering HPV vaccination and tailoring interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. Abhyankar P, O’Connor DB, Lawton R (2008) The role of message framing in promoting MMR vaccination: evidence of a loss-frame advantage. Psychol Health Med 13(1):1–16

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ajzen I (1988) Attitudes, personality and behavior. Open University Press, Milton Keynes, pp 179–211

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ajzen I (2002) Constructing a TPB questionnaire: conceptual and methodological considerations. http://people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf. September 2009

  4. Becker MH (1974) The health belief model and personal health behavior. Heal Educ Monogr 2:324–508

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brewer NT, Fazekas KI (2007) Determinants of HPV vaccine acceptability: a theory-informed, systematic review. Prev Med 45(2–3):107–114

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Caskey R, Lindau ST, Alexander GC (2009) Knowledge and early adoption of the HPV vaccine among girls and young women: results of a national survey. J Adolesc Health Off Publ Soc Adolesc Med 45(5):453–462. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.04.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Courneya KS, Hellsten LM (2001) Cancer prevention as a source of exercise motivation: an experimental test using protection motivation theory. Psychol Health Med 6(1):59–64

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gainforth HL, Latimer A (2011) Risky business: risk information and the moderating effect of message frame and past behaviour on women’s perceptions of the human papillomavirus vaccine. J Health Psychol. doi:10.1177/1359105311431173

  9. Graveland B (2009) HPV vaccine tough sell in parts of Canada, The Toronto Star. Accessed 2 March 2009

  10. Gulli K (2007) Our girls are not guinea pigs. Is an upcoming mass inoculation of a generation unnecessary and potentially dangerous? Macleans

  11. Kliewer EV, Demers AA, Brisson M, Severini A, Lotocki R, Elias B, Hammond G, Wurtak G, Manitoba HPV Research Group (2010) The Manitoba human papillomavirus vaccine surveillance and evaluation system. Health Rep 21(3):37–42

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lippman A, Melynchuck R, Shimmin C, Boscoe M (2007) Human papillomavirus, vaccines and women’s health: questions and cautions 177(5):484–487

  13. Merck (2010) Consumer Information: gardasil. Quebec. Merck Frost: Canada

  14. Neuwirth K, Dunwoody S, Griffin R (2000) Protection motivation and risk communication. Risk Anal 20(5):721–734

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nunally J (1978) Psychometric theory, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ogilvie G, Anderson M, Marra F, MCNeil S, Pielak K, Dawar M, McIvor M et al (2010) A population-based evaluation of a publicly funded, school-based HPV vaccine program in British Columbia, Canada: parental factors associated with HPV vaccine receipt. PLoS Med 7(5):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Olshen E, Woods ER, Austin SB, Luskin M, Bauchner H (2005) Parental acceptance of the human papillomavirus vaccine. J Adolesc Heal 37(3):248–251

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rogers RW (1975) A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. J Psychol 91(1):93

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) for funding this research.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen’s University, 28 Division St., Kingston, Ontario, Canada

    Heather L. Gainforth, Wei Cao & Amy E. Latimer-Cheung

Authors
  1. Heather L. Gainforth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wei Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amy E. Latimer-Cheung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Heather L. Gainforth or Amy E. Latimer-Cheung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gainforth, H.L., Cao, W. & Latimer-Cheung, A.E. Determinants of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination Intent Among Three Canadian Target Groups. J Canc Educ 27, 717–724 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-012-0389-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-012-0389-1

Keywords

  • Human papillomavirus (HPV)
  • Vaccine
  • Theory of planned behaviour
  • Protection motivation theory
  • Parents
  • College-aged women