Skip to main content
Log in

Study of Factors Contributing to Scorpion Envenomation in Arizona

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Arizona has the highest incidence of scorpion envenomation reported to US poison control centers (PCCs). Most cases reported are from a residence, but specific details are limited.

Methods

Specialists at Arizona’s two PCCs prospectively completed the Factors of Envenomation in Arizona Residences Survey (FEARS) for residential scorpion exposures reported during 4-week periods in the summer and winter. Based on these results, a second questionnaire, FEARS-2, targeting indoor residential exposures was then administered.

Results

Among 382 FEARS responses, no significant differences were found between summer and winter exposures, except for rainfall in the previous 24 hours. Scorpions had previously been seen in 81.8% of exposures, and 29.4% reported a previous envenomation at the residence. Most exposures occurred indoors (86.5%) and in a bedroom (42.5%), where the scorpion was in the bed in 54.7% of cases. Among all stings in a bed, 72.7% occurred while sleeping. Children were stung more often in a family room (38.6% vs. 14.5%; p < .00001) and by a scorpion on the floor (53.5% vs. 35.0%; p = .0014). Distal extremities were stung most often, particularly the foot (34.5%), with most being while barefoot (81.9%).

Conclusion

A variety of characteristics and associations involving residential scorpion envenomations were identified. These details can be used to guide public education and primary prevention efforts to help decrease residential scorpion exposures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kang AM, Brooks DE. Nationwide scorpion exposures reported to US poison control centers from 2005 to 2015. J Med Toxicol. 2017;13(2):158–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-016-0594-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Valdez-Cruz NA, Dávila S, Licea A, Corona M, Zamudio FZ, García-Valdes J, et al. Biochemical, genetic and physiological characterization of venom components from two species of scorpions: Centruroides exilicauda Wood and Centruroides sculpturatus Ewing. Biochimie. 2004;86(6):387–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2004.05.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Curry SC, Vance MV, Ryan PJ, Kunkel DB, Northey WT. Envenomation by the scorpion Centruroides sculpturatus. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1983;21(4–5):417–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bibbs CS, Bengston SE, Gouge DH. Exploration of refuge preference in the Arizona bark scorpion (Scorpiones: Buthidae). Environ Entomol. 2014;43(5):1345–53. https://doi.org/10.1603/EN14099.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Boyer L. History of scorpion antivenom: one Arizonan’s view. Toxicon. 2013;69:14–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2012.12.015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Armstrong EP, Bakall M, Skrepnek GH, Boyer LV. Is scorpion antivenom cost-effective as marketed in the United States? Toxicon. 2013;76:394–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2013.09.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Coorg V, Levitan RD, Gerkin RD, Muenzer J, Ruha AM. Clinical presentation and outcomes associated with different treatment modalities for pediatric bark scorpion envenomation. J Med Toxicol. 2017;13(1):66–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-016-0575-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sharpe D. Your chi-square test is statistically significant: now what? Pract Assess Res Eval. 2015;20(8).

  10. Beasley TM, Schumacker RE. Multiple regression approach to analyzing contingency tables: post hoc and planned comparison procedures. J Exp Educ. 1995;64(1):79–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1995.9943797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. MacDonald PL, Gardner RC. Type I error rate comparisons of post hoc procedures for I x J chi-square tables. Educ Psychol Meas. 2000;60(5):735–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640021970871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kang AM, Brooks DE. Geographic distribution of scorpion exposures in the United States, 2010–2015. Am J Public Health. 2017;107(12):1958–63. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2017.304094.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Santillán EG, Possani LD. North American scorpion species of public health importance with a reappraisal of historical epidemiology. Acta Trop. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2018.08.002.

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Min Kang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

None.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 96 kb)

ESM 2

(PDF 95 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bennett, B.K., Boesen, K.J., Welch, S.A. et al. Study of Factors Contributing to Scorpion Envenomation in Arizona. J. Med. Toxicol. 15, 30–35 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-018-0690-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-018-0690-4

Keywords

Navigation