Advertisement

Journal of Medical Toxicology

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 212–217 | Cite as

The Virtual Toxicology Journal Club: the Dissemination and Discussion of Noteworthy Manuscripts Using Twitter

  • Peter R. ChaiEmail author
  • Anne-Michelle Ruha
  • Kelly E. Wong
  • Derek L. Monette
  • Meghan B. Spyres
  • Jeff Lapoint
  • Howard Greller
  • Mark B. Mycyk
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Twitter-based chat groups (tweetchats) structured as virtual journal clubs have been demonstrated to provide value to learners. In order to promote topics in medical toxicology, we developed the #firesidetox tweetchat as a virtual journal club to discuss and disseminate topics in medical toxicology.

Methods

A group of medical toxicologists from the American College of Medical Toxicology (ACMT) Public Affairs Committee and editorial board of the Journal of Medical Toxicology (JMT) developed a quarterly one hour tweetchat featuring JMT manuscripts. We gathered basic twittergraphics and used a healthcare hashtag aggregator to measure the number of impressions, participants, and tweets per tweetchat session. A qualitative analysis of important themes from #firesidetox was also completed.

Results

During five tweetchats over 12 months, we attracted a mean of 23 participants generating a mean of 150 tweets per #firesidetox tweetchat. Tweets generated a mean of 329,200 impressions (unique user views): these impressions grew by 300% from the first through fifth #firesidetox. The majority of participants self-identified as medical toxicologists or physician learners. Although most were from the USA, participants also came from Australia, Poland, and Qatar. Most tweets centered on medical education and 7.9% tweets were learner-driven or questions asking for a medical toxicologist expert opinion.

Conclusion

The #firesidetox attracted a diverse group of toxicologists, learners, and members of the public in a virtual journal club setting. The increasing number of impressions, participants, and tweets during #firesidetox demonstrates the tweetchat model to discuss pertinent toxicology topics is feasible and well received among its participants.

Keywords

Medical education Twitter Journal clubs Toxicology 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

None

References

  1. 1.
    Chretien KC, Azar J, Kind T. Physicians on Twitter. JAMA. 2011;305:566–8. 2011 ed. Available from: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/jama.2011.68 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cheema N. Tweet this #toxicology2.0. J Med Toxicol 2014 ed. 2014;10:7–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chai PR. Enriching the toxicology experience through twitter. J Med Toxicol 2015;11:385–7Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Topf JM, Sparks MA, Phelan PJ, Shah N, Lerma EV, Graham-Brown MPM, et al. The evolution of the Journal Club: from Osler to Twitter. Am J Kidney Dis. 2017;69:827–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chai PR, Ranney ML, Rosen RK, Lewis DM, Boyer EW. Crowd-sourced focus groups on twitter: 140 characters of research insight. Proceedings of the th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2017;3746–53.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19:349–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Counselman FL, Babu K, Edens MA, Gorgas DL, Hobgood C, Marco CA, et al. The 2016 model of the clinical practice of emergency medicine. J Emerg Med. 2017;52:846–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Caravati EM, Ling LJ. Toxicology education in emergency medicine residency programs. Am J Emerg Med. 1992;10:169–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jouriles NJ, Cordell WH, Martin DR, Wolfe R, Emerman CL, Avery A. Emergency medicine journal clubs. Acad Emerg Med. 1996;3:872–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thangasamy IA, Leveridge M, Davies BJ, Finelli A, Stork B, Woo HH. International Urology Journal Club via Twitter: 12-month experience. Eur Urol. 2014;66:112–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gardhouse AI, Budd L, Yang SYC, Wong CL. GeriMedJC: the Twitter complement to the traditional-format Geriatric Medicine Journal Club. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017;65:1347–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gottesman SP, Klein WM, Hosler GA, Veprauskas KR, Rush PS, Gardner JM. #dermpathJC: the first online dermatopathology Twitter journal club. J Cutan Pathol. 2018;45:370–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Levine M, Offerman S, Vohra R, Wolk B, LaPoint J, Quan D, et al. Assessing the effect of a medical toxicologist in the care of rattlesnake-envenomated patients. Bird SB, editor. Acad Emerg Med 7 ed. 2018;11:2.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Curry SC, Brooks DE, Skolnik AB, Gerkin RD, Glenn S. Effect of a medical toxicology admitting service on length of stay, cost, and mortality among inpatients discharged with poisoning-related diagnoses. J Med Toxicol. 2015;11:65–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American College of Medical Toxicology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Medical Toxicology, Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women’s HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  2. 2.The Fenway InstituteBostonUSA
  3. 3.Division of Medical Toxicology and Precision Medicine, Department of MedicineUniversity of Arizona College of MedicineTucsonUSA
  4. 4.Department of Emergency Medicine, Rhode Island HospitalBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA
  5. 5.Division of Medical Toxicology, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Southern CaliforniaKeck School of MedicineLos AngelesUSA
  6. 6.Division of Medical Toxicology, Department of Emergency MedicineSouthern California Permanente Medical GroupPasadenaUSA
  7. 7.Division of Medical Toxicology, Department of Emergency MedicineSBH Health SystemsNew York CityUSA
  8. 8.Department of Emergency MedicineCook County Health and Hospitals SystemChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations