Journal of Medical Toxicology

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 7–9 | Cite as

Tweet This #Toxicology2.0

  • Navneet CheemaEmail author

The pervasiveness of social media is irrefutable. Social media is an umbrella term referring to blogs, podcasts, micro-blogging, wikis, and online videos to name a few. There are over one billion Facebook members and 500 million Twitter users [1]. One hundred hours of YouTube videos are uploaded every minute [2]. The media, law enforcement, and educational institutions have already recognized and begun to harness the potential of social media. Within only 8 mins of the Boston Marathon bombing, the Boston Globe sent out its first tweet announcing the explosions [3]. A missing Saudi Arabian teenager was found in just 3 hrs after a tweet with a mere 300 followers, thanks to the exponential power of re-tweeting [4]. Countless other examples exist from political campaigns driven by twitter to small businesses connecting with unprecedented numbers of customers. The field of medical toxicology possesses many unique qualities that make it ideal to maximize this new and powerful resource.




The author would like to thank Drs. Amandeep Cheema and Christine Murphy for their assistance with this editorial.

Source of Funding


Conflict of Interest



  1. 1.
    DeCamp M, Koenig TW, Chisolm MS (2013) Social media and physicians' online identity crisis. JAMA: J Am Med Assoc 310(6):581–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    YouTube Statistics. Accessed 12 Nov 2013.
  3. 3.
    Rogers S (2013) The Boston bombing: how journalists used Twitter to tell the story ( Accessed 13 Nov 2013.
  4. 4.
    Smith C (2011) Twitter helps finds missing child Faisal Fr—In just three hours Accessed 13 Nov 2013.
  5. 5.
    Densen P (2011) Challenges and opportunities facing medical education. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 122:48–58PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Prober CG, Heath C (2012) Lecture halls without lectures–a proposal for medical education. N Engl J Med 366(18):1657–1659CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mike Cadogan M, FOAM. Accessed 9 Nov 2013.
  8. 8.
    ACMT Management Questions Forum. Accessed 9 Nov 2013.
  9. 9.
    Mattu A (2013). Accessed 12 Nov 2013.
  10. 10.
    Scott IA, Glasziou PP (2012) Improving effectiveness of clinical medicine: the need for better translation of science into practice. Med J Aust 197(7):374–378CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Darracq MA, Thornton SL, Do HM, Bok D, Clark RF, Cantrell FL (2013) Utilization of hyperinsulinemia euglycemia and intravenous fat emulsion following poison center recommendations. J Med Toxicol: Off J Am Coll Med Toxicol 9(3):226–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mycyk MB, DesLauriers C, Metz J, Wills B, Mazor SS (2006) Compliance with poison center fomepizole recommendations is suboptimal in cases of toxic alcohol poisoning. Am J Ther 13(6):485–489CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Micieli R, Micieli JA (2012) Twitter as a tool for ophthalmologists. Can J Ophthalmol J canadien d’ophtalmologie 47(5):410–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    O’Connor A, Jackson L, Goldsmith L, Skirton H (2013) Can I get a retweet please? Health research recruitment and the Twittersphere. J Adv Nurs. In press.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Boyer EW, Smelson D, Fletcher R, Ziedonis D, Picard RW (2010) Wireless technologies, ubiquitous computing and mobile health: application to drug abuse treatment and compliance with HIV therapies. J Med Toxicol: Off J Am Coll Med Toxicol 6(2):212–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American College of Medical Toxicology 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Toxikon ConsortiumChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations