Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Beyond Tolerance: Policies, Practices, and Ideologies of Queer-Friendly Workplaces

  • Published:
Sexuality Research and Social Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

In the United States, workplace protections for queer and trans workers have expanded; however, previous research has indicated that policy change alone is not sufficient to create supportive workplace cultures. The inequality regimes theoretical framework suggests examining policies, practices, and ideologies to understand inequality in work organizations.

Methods

Drawing upon 75 qualitative interviews with queer and trans workers in the Portland, OR metro area conducted in 2013, we assessed the policies, practices, and ideologies that shaped how queer and trans workers experienced their workplaces.

Results

We found participants’ narratives about queer-friendly workplaces focused on: organizational policies and practices; disclosure, visibility, and recognition of queer and trans identities; and protection from discrimination based on sexuality, gender, and other intersecting marginalized identities. We found that trans workers experienced more challenges than cisgender workers in all these areas. In addition to articulating the impact of cisnormativity and heteronormativity, some participants experienced homonormativity, which emphasizes tolerance through assimilation and minimized the relevance of queer identities at work. We found that not all queer and trans people were equally able or willing to access this assimilation.

Conclusions

Ultimately, while laws and workplace policies provide critical protections for queer and trans workers, practices and ideologies that encourage queer disclosure, visibility, and recognition and provide protection from discrimination are also central to achieving acceptance, a central goal for queer-friendly workplaces.

Policy Implications

This research indicates that legal and organizational changes are needed to support queer-friendly workplaces. These changes include: policies (e.g. legal protections from discrimination, organizational anti-discrimination policies, policies to support transitioning workers), practices (e.g. recognition of queer and trans identities, queer and trans employee groups, gender neutral bathrooms), and ideologies (e.g. rejection of cisnormativity, heteronormativity, and homonormativity).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society, 20(4), 441–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alfrey, L., & Twine, F. W. (2017). Gender-fluid geek girls: Negotiating inequality regimes in the tech industry. Gender & Society, 31(1), 28–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbee, H., & Schrock, D. (2019) Un/Gendering social selves: How nonbinary people navigate and experience a binarily gendered world. Sociological Forum, 34(3), 572–593.

  • Benozzo, A., Pizzorno, M. C., Bell, H., & Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2015). Coming out, but into what? Problematizing discursive variations of revealing the gay self in the workplace. Gender, Work and Organization, 22(3), 292–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, C. (2010). Doing, undoing, or redoing gender?: Learning from the workplace experiences of transpeople. Gender & Society, 24(1), 31–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, C. (2012). Dangerous disclosures. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 9(2), 168–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, C. (2014). School’s out: Gay and lesbian teachers in the classroom. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Dahlkild-Öhman, G., & Eriksson, M. (2013). Inequality regimes and men’s positions in social work. Gender, Work and Organization, 20(1), 85–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, E. (2015). Purple-collar labor: Transgender workers and queer value at global call centers in the Philippines. Gender & Society, 29(2), 169–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duberley, J., Carrigan, M., Ferreira, J., & Bosangit, C. (2017). Diamonds are a girl’s best friend …? Examining gender and careers in the jewellery industry. Organization, 24(3), 355–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duggan, L. (2002). The new homonormativity: The sexual politics of neoliberalism (pp. 175–194). Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press.

  • Eliason, M. J., Dibble, S. L., & Robertson, P. A. (2011). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) physicians’ experiences in the workplace. Journal of Homosexuality, 58(10), 1355–1371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galupo, M. P., & Resnick, C. A. (2016). Experiences of LGBT microaggressions in the workplace: Implications for policy. In Sexual orientation and transgender issues in organizations (pp. 271–287). New York: Springer.

  • Galvin-White, C. M., & O’Neal, E. N. (2016). Lesbian police officers’ interpersonal working relationships and sexuality disclosure: A qualitative study. Feminist Criminology, 11(3), 253–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghaziani, A. (2011). Post-gay collective identity construction. Social Problems, 58(1), 99–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy, G., Bradley, H., & Forson, C. (2011). Intersectional sensibilities in analysing inequality regimes in public sector organizations. Gender, Work and Organization, 18(5), 467–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, J., & Parkin, W. (1995 [1987]). Sex at work: The power and paradox of organisation sexuality. New York: Macmillan St Martin’s Press.

  • HRC. (2013). Corporate Equality Index 2013. http://www.hrc.org.

  • HRC. (2018). Corporate Equality Index 2020. http://www.hrc.org.

  • HRC. (2020). Corporate Equality Index 2020. http://www.hrc.org.

  • James, S. E., Herman, J. L., Rankin, S., Keisling, M., & Mottet, L. (2016). The report of the 2015 U.S. transgender survey. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Transgender Equality.

  • Katz-Wise, S. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2012). Victimization experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sex Research, 49(2–3), 142–167.

  • Kelly, M., & Hauck, E. (2015). Doing housework, redoing gender: Queer couples negotiate the household division of labor. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 11(5), 438–464.

  • Kelly, M., & Lubitow, A. (2014). Pride at work: Organizing at the intersection of the labor and LGBT movements. Labor Studies Journal, 39(4), 257–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, M., Lubitow, A., Town, M., & Mercier, A. (2020). Collective trauma in queer communities. Sexuality & Culture, 24(5), 1522–1543.

  • Kelly, M., Wilkinson, L., Pisciotta, M., & Williams, L. S. (2015). When working hard is not enough for female and racial/ethnic minority apprentices in the highway trades. Sociological Forum, 30(2), 415–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerum, K. (2004). Sexuality, power, and camaraderie in service work. Gender & Society, 18(6), 756–776.

  • Lloren, A., & Parini, L. (2017). How LGBT-supportive workplace policies shape the experience of lesbian, gay men, and bisexual employees. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 14(3), 289–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattheis, A., Cruz-Ramírez De Arellano, D., & Yoder, J. (2019). A model of queer STEM identity in the workplace. Journal of Homosexuality, 63(13), 1839–1863.

  • Mishel, E. (2016). Discrimination against queer women in the U.S. workforce. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 2, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishel, E. (2020). Contextual prejudice: How occupational context and stereotypes shape bias against gay and lesbian employees. Social Currents, 7(4), 371–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Movement Advancement Project, Center for American Progress, Human Rights Campaign, Freedom to Work, and National Black Justice Coalition. (2013). A Broken Bargain for LGBT Workers of Color. http://www.lgbtmap.org/workers-of-color.

  • Newheiser, A. K., Barreto, M., & Tiemersma, J. (2017). People like me don’t belong here: Identity concealment is associated with negative workplace experiences. Journal of Social Issues, 73(2), 341–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, C. (2020). What the Supreme Court ruling in Bostock means for state legislative efforts. Human Rights Campaign. https://www.hrc.org/blog/what-the-supreme-court-ruling-in-bostock-means-for-state-legislative-effort.

  • Orne, J. (2011). ‘You will always have to “out” yourself’: Reconsidering coming out through strategic outness. Sexualities, 14(6), 681–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orzechowicz, D. (2010). Fierce bitches on tranny lane: Gender, sexuality, culture, and the closet in theme park parades. In C. Williams, K. Dillinger, & L. Keister (Eds.), Gender and sexuality in the workplace (Vol. 20, pp. 227–252). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

  • Orzechowicz, D. (2016). The Walk-In Closet: Between “Gay-Friendly” and “Post-Closeted” Work. In Research in the Sociology of Work. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

  • Rabelo, V. C., & Cortina, L. M. (2014). Two sides of the same coin: Gender harassment and heterosexist harassment in LGBQ work lives. Law and Human Behavior, 38(4), 378–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rennstam, J., & Sullivan, K. R. (2018). Peripheral inclusion through informal silencing and voice—A study of LGB officers in the Swedish police. Gender, Work and Organization, 25(2), 177–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, C. A., & Galupo, M. P. (2019). Assessing experiences with LGBT microaggressions in the workplace: Development and validation of the microaggression experiences at work scale. Journal of Homosexuality, 66(10), 1380–1403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumens, N., & Broomfield, J. (2014). Gay men in the performing arts: Performing sexualities within ‘gay-friendly’ work contexts. Organization, 21(3), 365–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schilt, K. (2010). Just one of the guys?: Transgender men and the persistence of gender inequality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Seidman, S. (2004). Beyond the closet: The transformation of gay and lesbian life. East Sussex: Psychology Press.

  • Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246.

  • Tilcsik, A., Anteby, M., & Knight, C. (2015). Concealable stigma and occupational segregation: Toward a theory of gay and lesbian occupations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60(3), 446–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaid, U. (1995). Beyond rights and mainstreaming (pp. 178–209). The Mainstreaming of Gay and Lesbian Liberation: Virtual Equality.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitulli, E. (2010). A defining moment in civil rights history? The employment non-discrimination act, trans-inclusion, and homonormativity. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 7, 155–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. (2008). Respectably queer: Diversity culture in LGBT activist organizations. Chapel Hill: Vanderbilt University Press.

  • Wessel, J. L. (2017). The importance of allies and allied organizations: Sexual orientation disclosure and concealment at work. Journal of Social Issues, 73(2), 240–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. L. (2013). Gendered organizations and inequality regimes: Gender, homosexuality, and inequality within religious congregations. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 52(3), 476–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wijers, G. D. (2019). Inequality regimes in Indonesian dairy cooperatives: Understanding institutional barriers to gender equality. Agriculture and Human Values, 36(2), 167–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. L., Giuffre, P. A., & Dellinger, K. (2009). The gay-friendly closet. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 6(1), 29–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, P. (2011). Laboring in silence: Young lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer-identifying workers’ negotiations of the workplace closet in Australian organizations. Youth & Society, 43(3), 957–981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, J. D., & Lucas, J. H. (1993). The corporate closet: The professional lives of gay men in America. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yavorsky, J. E. (2016). Cisgendered organizations: Trans women and inequality in the workplace. Sociological Forum, 31(4), 948–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoder, J., & Mattheis, A. (2016). Queer in STEM: Workplace experiences reported in a national survey of LGBTQA individuals in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. Journal of Homosexuality, 63(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by funding from a Portland State University Faculty Enhancement Grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, Portland State University, 1721 SW Broadway #217, Portland, OR, 97201, USA

    Maura Kelly, JaDee Carathers & Tristen Kade

Authors
  1. Maura Kelly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. JaDee Carathers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tristen Kade
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maura Kelly.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Ethical Approval

This research was approved by the Portland State University Institutional Review Board.

Informed Consent

All participants provided informed consent for participation in this research.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kelly, M., Carathers, J. & Kade, T. Beyond Tolerance: Policies, Practices, and Ideologies of Queer-Friendly Workplaces. Sex Res Soc Policy 18, 1078–1093 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-020-00512-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-020-00512-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation