The last decade has seen an expansion in initiatives promoting the development of special sex services oriented to people with disabilities, which in Europe are increasingly labelled ‘sexual assistance’. These have become the object of political and media attention, and arguably call for a critical analysis incorporating both disability and sex workers’ rights perspectives. Based on an 18-month embedded participant observation, I explore the case of a grassroots organisation which brings together sexual assistants, disabled activists and (potential) clients, and their allies in Switzerland. Opposing ‘therapy’, ‘charity’, and ‘care’ approaches to sexual assistance, members of this organisation work within their own model of ‘ethical’ services. While they place sexual pleasure at the centre of this approach, in practice, they promote forms of self-regulation aimed at limiting the risks of sex services, connected in particular to intimate violence, stigmatisation, sex normativity, and the role of intermediaries. Clearly rooted in a disability rights perspective, this grassroots initiative does not only concern sexual assistance but more largely sex services. In this sense, this study invites us to look at sexual assistance as an interesting space for alliance between sex workers’ rights and the rights of people with disabilities, as a uniquely politicised group of (potential) clients.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Abberley, P. (2002). Work, disability, disabled people and European social theory. In C. Barnes, M. Oliver, & L. Barton (Eds.), Disability studies today. Malden: Blackwell Publishers Ltd..
Aloni, R., Keren, O., & Katz, S. (2007). Sex therapy surrogate partners for individuals with very limited functional ability following traumatic brain injury. Sexuality and Disability, 25(3), 125–134.
Andrijasevic, R. (2013). Migration and sex work, Europe. In I. Ness (Ed.), Encyclopedia of global human migration. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Aregger, J. (2016) L’assistance sexuelle: Une réelle amelioration de la qualité vie des personnes vivant avec un handicap, âgées ou souffrant de troubles sexuels, grace a une prestation de travail du sexe: est-ce socialement acceptable et integrable? Memoire: Sexologie clinique, Université de Geneve: https://www.unige.ch/formcont/files/9715/1326/9622/CAS_sexologieclinique_memoire_assistance_sexuelle_Aregger.pdf. Accessed 27 Jan 2019.
Bahner, J. (2015). Sexual professionalism: for whom? The case of sexual facilitation in Swedish personal assistance services. Disability and Society, 30(5), 788–801.
Beckett, C. (2007). Women, disability, care: Good neighbours or uneasy bedfellows? Critical Social Policy, 27, 360–380.
Bonnie, S. (2004). Disabled people, disability and sexuality. In J. Swain, S. French, C. Barnes, & C. Thomas (Eds.), Disabling barriers, enabling environments. London: Sage Publications.
Boris, E., & Salazar Parreñas, R. (Eds.). (2010). Intimate labors: Cultures, technologies and the politics of care. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Bouma, G., & Atkinson, G. (1995). Handbook of social science research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bournot-Trites, M., & Belanger, J. (2005). Ethical dilemmas facing action researchers. Journal of Educational Thought, 39(2), 197–215.
Brasseur, P., & Detuncq, P. (2014). L’assistance sexuelle : Qu’est-ce-à-dire? Quels enjeux? Vie sociale et traitements, 3(123), 51–56.
Bugnon, G., Chimienti, M., & Chiquet, L. (with J Eberhard) (2009) Marché du sexe en Suisse : Etat des connaissances, best practices et recommandations, Volet 3 – Mapping, contrôle et promotion de la santé dans le marché du sexe en Suisse, Sociograph 7. Genève : Université de Genève.
Campagna, N. (2012). La sexualite’ des handicapes. Faut-il seulement la tolerer ou aussi l’encourager? Geneva: Labor et Fides.
Campbell, F. K. (2008). Exploring internalized ableism using critical race theory. Disability & Society, 23(2), 151–162.
Cruz, K. (2013). Unmanageable work, (un) liveable lives: The UK sex industry, labour rights and the welfare state. Social and Legal Studies, 22(4), 465–488.
De Boer, T. (2015). Disability and sexual inclusion. Hypatia, 30(1), 66–81.
De Vries, N. (2013) Training to become a sexual assistant for disabled people, unpublished text.
Dewey, S., & Zheng, T. (2013). Ethical research with sex workers: anthropological approaches. New York: Springer.
Dufour, P. (2013). L’expérience Handie. Handicap et Virilite. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
Dufour, P., & Thierry, J. B. (2014). Les impasses de l’assistance sexuelle. In Y. Jeanne (Ed.), Au Risque du Désir. Editions Érès: Toulouse.
Earle, S. (1999). Facilitated sex and the concept of sexual need: Disabled students and their personal assistants. Disability and Society, 14(3), 309–323.
Fassin, E. (2010). National identities and transnational intimacies: Sexual democracy and the politics of immigration in Europe. Public Culture, 22(3), 507–529.
Fiduccia, B. W. (2000). Current issues in sexuality and the disability movement. Sexuality and Disability, 18(3), 167–174.
Fine, M., & Glendinning, C. (2005). “Dependence, Independence or Interdependence? Re-visiting the Concepts of “Care” and “Dependency”’. Ageing and Society, 25, 601–21.
Fritsch, K., Heynen, R., Ross, A. N., & Van Der Meulen, E. (2016). Disability and sex work: Developing affinities through decriminalization. Disability & Society, 31(1), 84–99.
Galvin, R. (2004). Challenging the need for gratitude: Comparisons between paid and unpaid care for disabled people. Journal of Sociology, 40(2), 137–155.
Garofalo Geymonat, G. (2014). Oltre il dibattito pubblico, ma non oltre la critica: pratiche di assistenza sessuale in Europa. In M. Ulivieri (Ed.), LoveAbility. L’assistenza sessuale per le persone con disabilità (pp. 99–114). Trento: Edizioni Centro Studi Erikson.
Garofalo Geymonat, G., & Macioti, P. G. (2016). Ambivalent professionalisation and autonomy in workers’ collective projects: The cases of sex worker peer educators in Germany and sexual assistants in Switzerland. Sociological Research Online, 21(4), 10.
Gatenby, B., & Humphries, M. (2000). Feminist participatory action research: Some methodological and ethical issues. Women's Studies International Forum, 23(1), 89–106.
Gerschick, T. (2007). The body, disability, and sexuality. In S. Seidman, N. Fischer, & C. Meeks (Eds.), Handbook of new sexuality studies. London: Routledge.
ICRSE. (2016). Nothing about us without us! Ten Years of Sex Workers’ Rights Activism and Advocacy in Europe. http://www.sexworkeurope.org/sites/default/files/userfiles/files/ICRSE_10years%20report_April2016_photo_%282%29.pdf. Accessed 27 Jan 2019.
Inckle, K. (2015). Debilitating times: Compulsory ablebodiedness and white privilege in theory and practice. Feminist Review, 111, 42–58.
Jeffreys, S. (2008). Disability and the male sex right. Women’s Studies International Forum, 31, 327–335.
Kafer, A. (2013). Feminist, queer, crip. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Karpman, S. (1968). Fairy tales and script drama analysis. Transactional Analysis Bulletin, 26, 39–43.
Kelly, C. (2015). Disability politics and care. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Kittay, E. F., Jennings, B., & Wasunna, A. A. (2005). Dependency, difference and the global ethic of longterm care. Journal of Political Philosophy, 13(4), 443–469.
Kulick, D., & Rydström, J. (2015). Loneliness and its opposite: Sex, disability and the ethics of engagement. Durham: Duke University Press.
Liddiard, K. (2014). “I never felt like she was just doing it for the money”: Disabled men’s intimate (gendered) realities of purchasing sexual pleasure and intimacy. Sexualities, 17(7), 837–855.
Maxey, I. (1999). Beyond boundaries? Activism, academia, reflexivity and research. Area, 31(3), 199–208.
McCarthy, M. (1999). Sexuality and women with learning disabilities. London: Jessica Kingsley.
McCarthy, M. (2016). Understanding and exploring the effects of informal care on the sexual self: A disability perspective. Graduate Journal of Social Science, 12(1), 96–117.
McReur, R., & Mollow, A. (2012). Sex and disability. Durham: Duke University Press.
Milligan, M., & Neufeldt, A. (2001). “The Myth of Asexuality: A Survey of Social and Empirical evidence”. Sexuality and Disability, 19, 91–109.
Mona, L. (2003). Sexual options for people with disabilities: Using personal assistance services for sexual expression. Women and Therapy, 26(3–4), 211–220.
Naples, N. A. (2003). Feminism and method: Ethnography, discourse analysis, and activist research. New York: Routledge.
Nayak, L. (2013). Une logique de promotion de la ‘santé sexuelle’. L’assistance sexuelle en Suisse. Ethnologie Française, 3(43), 461–468.
NSWP. (2017). Sex work as work. Policy Brief. http://www.nswp.org/sites/nswp.org/files/policy_brief_sex_work_as_work_nswp_-_2017.pdf. Accessed 27 Jan 2019.
Nussbaum, M. (2007). Frontiers of justice. Disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge (MA)/London: Harvard University Press.
O’brien, M. (2003 ) Sex surrogate. In O’Brien, M. (G. Kendall) How I became a human being: A disabled man’s quest for independence. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Oliver, M., & Barnes, C. (2012). The new politics of disablement. Tavistock: Palgrave Macmillan.
Östergen, P. (2017). From zero tolerance to full integration: Rethinking prostitution policies. DemandAT working paper 10 http://www.demandat.eu/sites/default/files/DemandAT_WP10_ProstitutionPoliciesTypology_June2017_0.pdf. Accessed 27 Jan 2019.
Pitcher, J. (2015). Sex work and modes of self-employment in the informal economy: Diverse business practices and constraints to effective working. Social Policy and Society, 14(1), 113–123.
Plows, A. (2008). Social movements and ethnographic methodologies: An analysis using case study examples. Sociology Compass, 2(5), 1523–1538.
Prayez, P. (2015). Non-assistance Sexuelle à Personne en Danger. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Richardson, D. (2017). Sexuality and citizenship. Cambridge: Polity.
Sanders, T. (2007). The politics of sexual citizenship: Commercial sex and disability. Disability & Society, 22(5), 439–455.
Sanders, T. (2008). Selling sex in the shadow economy. International Journal of Social Economics, 35(1), 704–716.
Scoular, J., & Sanders, T. (2010). Introduction: The changing social and legal context of sexual commerce – Why regulation matters. Journal of Law and Society, 37(1), 1–11.
Shakespeare, T. (2000a). Help. Birmingham: Venture Press.
Shakespeare, T. (2000b). Disabled sexuality: Towards rights and recognition. Sexuality and Disability, 18(3), 159–166.
Shakespeare, T., Gillespie-Sells, K., & Davies, D. (1996). The sexual politics of disability: Untold desires. London: Cassell.
Shildrick, M. (2007). Contested pleasures: The sociopolitical economy of disability and sexuality. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 4(1), 53–66.
Shuttleworth, R. (2007). Introduction to special issue: Critical research and policy debates in disability and sexuality studies. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 4(1), 1–14.
Shuttleworth, R., & Sanders, T. (Eds.). (2010). Sex and disability: Politics, identity and access. Leeds: Disability Press.
Siebers, T. (2012). A sexual culture for disabled people. In R. McRuer & A. Mollow (Eds.), Sex and disability. Durham: Duke University Press.
Silvers, A. (1995). Reconciling equality to difference: Caring for justice for people with disabilities. Hypatia, 10, 30–55.
Stanley, L., & Wise, S. (1990). Method, methodology and epistemology in feminist research processes. In L. Stanley (Ed.), Feminist praxis: Research, theory and epistemology in feminist sociology. London: Routledge.
Stone, E., & Priestley, M. (1997). Parasites, pawns and partners: Disability research and the role of non-disabled researchers. British Journal of Sociology, 47, 699–716.
Tampep International Foundation. (2009). Sex work in Europe. European network for HIV/STI prevention and health promotion among migrant sex workers.
Taylor, Y., Hines, S., & Casey, M. E. (Eds.). (2011). Theorizing intersectionality and sexuality. Hampshire: Palgrave McMillan.
Tepper, M. (2000). Facilitated sex: The next frontier in sexuality? New Mobility, 11(84), 21–24.
Tepper, M. (2006). Sexuality and disability: The missing discourse of pleasure. Sexuality and Disability, 18(4), 283–290.
Thomas, C. (2002). Disability theory: Key ideas, issues and thinkers. In C. Barnes, M. Oliver, & L. Barton (Eds.), Disability studies today. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
United Nations. (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. New York: UN.
Vatré, F., & Agthe Diserens C. (2012). Assistance sexuelle et handicaps. Lyon: Chronique Sociale.
Wagenaar, H., & Jahnsen, S. (Eds.). (2017). Assessing prostitution policies in Europe. London: Routledge.
WHO. (2006). Defining sexual health. Report of a Technical Consultation on Sexual Health 28–31 January 2002. Geneva: WHO.
Wotton, R. (2016). Sex workers who provide services to clients with disability in New South Wales, Australia. Master of Philosophy Thesis, University of Sydney. https://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/bitstream/2123/16875/1/Wotton_RW_thesis.pdf. Accessed 27 Jan 2019.
I am very grateful to all the people that participated in my research and contributed their insights. I would also like to thank P.G. Macioti for her comments on earlier drafts of this article.
This study was originally funded by the European Commission under FP7-PEOPLE-2011-IEF, Award N. 302299, Project Acronym: Sexual Assistance. This particular piece of writing was also supported by the COST Action IS1209 ‘Comparing European Prostitution Policies: Understanding Scaled and Cultures of Governance’.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Garofalo Geymonat, G. Disability Rights Meet Sex Workers’ Rights: the Making of Sexual Assistance in Europe. Sex Res Soc Policy 16, 214–226 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-019-0377-x
- Sexual assistance
- Sexual surrogacy
- Disability rights
- Sex workers’ rights
- Sex workers’ clients