Advertisement

The Campaign Against Sex Work in the United States: A Successful Moral Crusade

  • Ronald WeitzerEmail author
Article

Abstract

Sex work was not a prominent public issue in the USA a generation ago. Law and law enforcement were fairly settled. Over the past two decades, however, a robust campaign has sought to intensify the stigmatization and criminalization of the participants involved in all types of sex work, which are now conflated with human trafficking. These efforts have been remarkably successful in reshaping government policy and legal norms and in enhancing penalties for existing offenses. The article analyzes these developments within the framework of a modernized version of moral crusade theory that includes both instrumental and expressive arguments against sex work.

Keywords

Moral crusade theory Polymorphous paradigm Sex work Sex trafficking Symbolic politics 

Notes

References

  1. Albert, A. (2001). Brothel: Mustang ranch and its women. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, Ted. (2018). “Sex workers returned to sf streets after Backpage.com Shut Down,” San Francisco Chronicle, October 17.
  3. Arkansas. (2017). House resolution 1042. State of Arkansas.Google Scholar
  4. Attorney General. (2016). Annual Report to Congress and Assessment of U.S. Government Activities to Combat Trafficking in Persons, Fiscal Year 2015. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  5. Attwood, F. (2006). Sexed up: Theorizing the sexualization of culture. Sexualities, 9, 77–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baskin, M. (2017). “Law Enforcement’s Backpage Problem,” Pacific Standard Magazine, January 13.Google Scholar
  7. Beato, Greg. (2004). “Xtreme measures: Washington’s new crackdown on pornography,” Reason Online. Available from http://www.reason.com/0405/fe.gb.xtreme.shtml (accessed August 2, 2009).
  8. Becker, H. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  9. Birch, P. (2015). Why men buy sex: Examining sex worker clients. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brennan, D. (2017). Fighting human trafficking today: Moral panics, zombie data, and the seduction of rescue. Wake Forest Law Review, 52, 477–492.Google Scholar
  11. Brents, B., & Hausbeck, K. (2005). Violence and legalized brothel prostitution in Nevada. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 270–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brents, B., & Sanders, T. (2010). Mainstreaming the sex industry: Economic inclusion and social ambivalence. Journal of Law and Society, 37, 40–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brents, B., Jackson, C., & Hausbeck, K. (2010). The state of sex: Tourism, sex, and sin in the New American Heartland. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Brooks-Gordon, B. (2006). The price of sex: Prostitution, policy, and society. Portland: Willan.Google Scholar
  15. Chuang, J. (2014). Exploitation creep and the unmaking of human trafficking law. American Journal of International Law, 108, 609–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Church, S., Henderson, M., Barnard, M., & Hart, G. (2001). Violence by clients towards female prostitutes in different work settings. British Medical Journal, 32, 524–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cohen, S. (1972). Folk devils and moral panics. London: MacGibbon and Kee.Google Scholar
  18. Daalder, A. (2007). Prostitution in the Netherlands since the lifting of the brothel ban. The Hague: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
  19. DeLong, M. (2012). “Rick Santorum: Obama administration is soft on pornography,” Washington Post, March 18.Google Scholar
  20. Department of Justice. (1988). Beyond the pornography commission: The Federal Response. Washington: Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  21. Department of State. (2004, 2005, 2009, 2010, 2015, 2017). Trafficking in Persons Report. Washington: Department of State. Google Scholar
  22. Europap. (2001). Report Questionnaire 2001 in Belgium. Europap.Google Scholar
  23. Farley, M. (2007). Prostitution and trafficking in Nevada: Making the connections. San Francisco: Prostitution Research and Education.Google Scholar
  24. Federal Ministry of the Interior. (2015). Polizei Kriminalstatistik. Berlin: Federal Ministry of the Interior.Google Scholar
  25. Frank, D., Camp, B., & Boutcher, S. (2010). Worldwide trends in the criminal regulation of sex, 1945 to 2005. American Sociological Review, 75, 867–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Garland, D. (2008). On the concept of moral panic. Crime, Media, Culture, 4, 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goode, E., & Ben-Yehuda, N. (1994). Moral panics: The social construction of deviance. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  28. Grant, M. G. (2014) “Will nobody listen to the sex workers,” The Guardian, March 15.Google Scholar
  29. Gulati, G. (2011). News frames and story triggers in the media’s coverage of human trafficking. Human Rights Review, 12, 363–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gusfield, J. (1963). Symbolic crusade: Status politics and the American temperance movement. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  31. Harcourt, C. (2010). The decriminalization of prostitution is associated with better coverage of health promotion programs for sex workers. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 34, 482–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harcourt, C., & Donovan, B. (2005). The many faces of sex work. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 81, 201–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hughes, D. (2005). The demand for victims of sex trafficking. University of Rhode Island.Google Scholar
  34. Hunt, A. (1999). The purity wars: Making sense of moral militancy. Theoretical Criminology, 3, 409–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Idaho. (2018). House Concurrent Resolution No. 50. State of Idaho.Google Scholar
  36. Johnston, A., Friedman, B., & Shafer, A. (2014). Framing the problem of sex trafficking. Feminist Media Studies, 14, 419–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jones, B. (2002) “Trafficking cops,” World Magazine, June 15.Google Scholar
  38. Kansas. (2018). Senate Resolution No. 1762. State of Kansas.Google Scholar
  39. Kirkpatrick, R. G., & Zurcher, L. (1983). Women against pornography. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 3, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Koster, K. & Roth, L. (2016) “Six problems with media coverage on the sex trade,” Huffington Post, September 22.Google Scholar
  41. Krűsi, A. (2014). Criminalization of clients: Reproducing vulnerabilities for violence and poor health among street-based sex workers in Canada. BMJ Open, 4, 1–10.Google Scholar
  42. LaPlante, M. (2018). In Utah, fight against porn is being framed as a public health crisis. Washington Post, 18, A11.Google Scholar
  43. LaRue, J. (2003) “DOJ releases list of ‘obscenity prosecutions during this administration’,” Concerned Women for America. Available from www.cfwa.org (accessed December 28, 2003).
  44. Laugesen, W. (2007). “Pornography crackdown,” National Catholic Register, April 22.Google Scholar
  45. Leidholdt, D. (2004). Prostitution and trafficking in women: An intimate relationship. Journal of Trauma Practice, 2, 167–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lennard, N. (2018). “Law claiming to fight sex trafficking is doing the opposite – by cracking down on sex work advocacy and organizing,” The Intercept, June 13. Available from https://theintercept.com/2018/06/13/sesta-fosta-sex-work-criminalize-advocacy/ (accessed June 14, 2018).
  47. Levy, A. F. (2017). The virtues of unvirtuous spaces. Wake Forest Law Review, 52, 403–434.Google Scholar
  48. Levy, J., & Jakobsson, P. (2014). Sweden’s abolitionist discourse and law: Effects on the dynamics of Swedish sex work and on the lives of Sweden’s sex workers. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 14, 593–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Loftus, D. (2002). Watching sex: How men really respond to pornography. New York: Thunder’s Mouth Press.Google Scholar
  50. Louisiana. (2017). House Concurrent Resolution No. 100. State of Louisiana.Google Scholar
  51. Lowman, J., & Atchison, C. (2006). Men who buy sex: A survey in the greater Vancouver Regional District. The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 43, 281–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. MacKinnon, C. (2005). Pornography as trafficking. Michigan Journal of International Law, 26, 993–1012.Google Scholar
  53. Macleod, J., Farley, M., Anderson, L., & Golding, J. (2008). Challenging men’s demand for prostitution in Scotland. Glasgow: Women’s Support Project.Google Scholar
  54. Marchionni, D. (2012). International human trafficking: An agenda-building analysis of the US and British press. International Communication Gazette, 74, 145–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Masenior, N., & Beyrer, C. (2007). The U.S. anti-prostitution pledge: First amendment challenges and public health priorities. PLoS Medicine, 4, 1158–1161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. McGee, J. (1993). “U.S. Crusade against pornography tests the limits of freedom,” Washington Post, January 11.Google Scholar
  57. McKee, A., Albury, K., & Lumby, C. (2008). The porn report. Carlton: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  58. McNair, B. (2002). Striptease culture: Sex, media, and the democratization of desire. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Milrod, C., & Weitzer, R. (2012). The intimacy prism: Emotion management among the clients of escorts. Men & Masculinities, 15, 447-467.Google Scholar
  60. Monto, M. (2010). Prostitutes’ customers: Motives and misconceptions. In R. Weitzer (Ed.), Sex for sale: Prostitution, pornography, and the sex industry. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  61. Monto, M., & Milrod, C. (2014). Ordinary or peculiar men? Comparing the customers of prostitutes with a nationally representative sample of men. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 58, 802–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Motivans, M., & Snyder, H. (2018). Federal prosecution of human-trafficking cases, 2015. Washington: Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  63. O’Brien, E., Hayes, S., & Carpenter, B. (2013). The politics of sex trafficking. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. O’Connor, M., & Healy, G. (2006). The links between prostitution and sex trafficking: A briefing handbook. CATW and European Women’s Lobby.Google Scholar
  65. Pearl, J. (1987). The highest paying customer: America’s cities and the costs of prostitution control. Hastings Law Journal, 38, 769–800.Google Scholar
  66. Peterson, M., Robinson, B., & Shih, E. (2019). The new virtual crackdown on sex workers’ rights. Anti-Trafficking Review, 12, 189–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Phillips, A. (2016). “Porn has been declared a ‘Public Health Crisis’ in Utah,” Washington Post, April 22.Google Scholar
  68. Porth, K. (2018). Sex, lies, and committee hearings: Challenging prostitution propaganda. In E. Durisin, E. van der Meulen, & C. Bruckert (Eds.), Red light labour: Sex work regulation, agency, and resistance. Victoria: University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
  69. Prostitution Task Force. (1999). Workable solutions to the problem of street prostitution in Buffalo, New York. Buffalo: Task Force.Google Scholar
  70. Puddy, R. (2019). “Sex workers visit South Australia Parliament to push for decriminalization of prostitution,” ABC News, March 28.Google Scholar
  71. Raymond, J. (2004). Ten reasons for not legalizing prostitution and a legal response to the demand for prostitution. Journal of Trauma Practice, 2, 315–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Reilly, R. (2013). “Eric Holder, ‘Porn Facilitator’? ‘Dirty’ list highlights lull in obscenity war,” Huffington Post, April 3.Google Scholar
  73. Remick, E. (2014). Regulating prostitution in China. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rocha, V. (2015). “Operator of prostitution site MyRedBook sentenced to federal prison,” Los Angeles Times, May 22.Google Scholar
  75. Sampson, L. (2014). The obscenities of this country: Canada v. Bedford and the reform of Canadian Prostitution Laws. Duke Journal of Gender, Law and Policy, 22, 137–172.Google Scholar
  76. San Francisco Committee on Crime. (1971). A report on non-victim crime in San Francisco, part 2: Sexual conduct, gambling, pornography. San Francisco: Mayor’s Office.Google Scholar
  77. Sanders, T. (2008). Paying for pleasure: Men who buy sex. Portland: Willan.Google Scholar
  78. Sanders, T., & Campbell, R. (2007). Designing out vulnerability, building in respect. British Journal of Sociology, 58, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Schwarzwalder, R. (2014). “Obscenity and legal prosecution: A case of non-enforcement,” Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, Southern Baptist Convention, October 23. Available from https://erlc.com/resource-library/articles/obscenity-and-legal-prosecution-a-case-of-non-enforcement (accessed June 8, 2018).
  80. Smith, L. (2018). Shared hope statement regarding FOSTA-SESTA and the Backpage Seizure. https://sharedhope.org/2018/04/11/statement-regarding-fosta-sesta/
  81. Snadowsky, D. (2005). The best little whorehouse is not in Texas: How Nevada’s prostitution laws serve public policy and how those laws may be improved. Nevada Law Journal, 6, 217–247.Google Scholar
  82. South Dakota. (2017). Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 4. State of South Dakota.Google Scholar
  83. Stolz, B. (2005). Educating policymakers and setting the criminal justice agenda: Interest groups and the ‘victims of trafficking and violence act of 2000′. Criminal Justice, 5, 407–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Sullivan, B. (2010). When (some) prostitution is legal: The impact of law reform on sex work in Australia. Journal of Law and Society, 37, 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Di Tommaso, M., Shima, I., Strøm, S., & Bettio, F. (2009). As bad as it gets: Well-being deprivation of sexually exploited trafficked women. European Journal of Political Economy, 25, 143–162.Google Scholar
  86. U.S. Senate. (2017). Backpage.com’s knowing facilitation of online sex trafficking. Permanent Committee on Investigations, Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  87. Utah. (2016). Concurrent resolution on the public health crisis SCR 9. State of Utah.Google Scholar
  88. Van Brunschot, E., Sydie, R., & Krull, C. (1999). Images of prostitution: The prostitute and print media. Women & Criminal Justice, 10, 47–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Vance, C. (1986). The Meese commission on the road. The Nation, 2, 65, 76–82.Google Scholar
  90. Vanwesenbeeck, I. (2001). Another decade of social scientific work on prostitution. Annual Review of Sex Research, 12, 242–289.Google Scholar
  91. Vanwesenbeeck, I. (2017). Sex work criminalization is barking up the wrong tree. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 1631–1640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Villarreal, A. (2018). “Side effect of trafficking law: More street prostitution?” AP News, September 24.Google Scholar
  93. Virginia. (2017). House Joint Resolution No. 549. Commonwealth of Virginia.Google Scholar
  94. Wagenaar, H., Amesberger, H., & Altink, S. (2017). Designing prostitution policy: Intention and reality in regulating the sex trade. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Weinberg, M., Williams, C., Kleiner, S., & Irizarry, Y. (2010). Pornography, normalization, and empowerment. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1389–1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Weitzer, R. (2007). The social construction of sex trafficking. Politics and Society, 35, 447–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Weitzer, R. (2010). Sex work: Paradigms and policies. In R. Weitzer (Ed.), Sex for Sale: Prostitution, pornography, and the sex industry. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  98. Weitzer, R. (2012). Legalizing prostitution: From illicit vice to lawful business. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  99. Weitzer, R. (2018). Resistance to sex work stigma. Sexualities, 21, 717–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Whittier, N. (2014). Rethinking coalitions: Anti-pornography feminists, conservatives, and relationships between collaborative adversarial movements. Social Problems, 61, 175–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Wood, B. (2017) “Most Utahns support pornography lawsuit bill,” Salt Lake Tribune, February 6.Google Scholar
  102. Zurcher, L., & Kirkpatrick, R. (1976). Citizens for decency: Antipornography crusades as status defense. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyGeorge Washington UniversityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations