Abstract
Despite the stereotype that “all the gays are liberal,” sexual identity (sexual orientation) has largely been overlooked in explorations of political attitudes save a handful of studies. The existing research indicates that lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) people tend to be more liberal than heterosexuals, supporting a “sexuality gap” in liberalism; however, there is significantly less work focused on LGB attitudes toward specific politicized topics, even less research that investigates the role of gender in these relationships, and no existing studies focusing on mostly heterosexuals’ (MH) political attitudes. The current study explores sexuality and gender gaps in political perspectives among college students enrolled at a university in the southern USA (N = 1940). Specifically, sexual identity (lesbian, gay, bisexual, mostly heterosexual, and heterosexual); gender (man/woman); and the intersections among sexual identity and gender are explored as they relate to politicized perspectives (liberal ideology and feminist identity) and support of politicized issues (death penalty and legal abortion). It is hypothesized that liberal social justice perspectives may be particularly common among LGB people as a group and perhaps especially among lesbian and bisexual women due to their multiple oppressed identities. Results confirm sexuality gaps (heterosexual-LGB, MH-LGB, and B-LG) as well as gender gaps among MH and LGB students (MH women-MH men, bisexual women-bisexual men, gay men-lesbian women), though some gaps (B-LG and G-L) are in the opposite direction from expected. In addition, there is evidence of a bisexual woman consciousness that relates to strong liberalism among bisexual college women. Overall, this research seeks to fill the gaps in the literature, expand our knowledge about sexuality and gender gaps in political attitudes, and contribute to new lines of inquiry that focus on MH and LGB people’s perspectives. In doing so, the current study works toward a deeper understanding of ways college students can promote political change and advocate for social justice.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Historically, this process can be seen in numerous instances, including the aftermath of the 1969 Stonewall uprising, which is often credited as the watershed demonstration that began the US gay liberation movement. Although the uprising was instigated and supported by two trans women of color, Sylvia Rivera and Marsha P. Johnson, these women have been repeatedly erased from discussions about LGBTQ rights. This is likely because Stonewall and its accompanying activism became dominated by White gay cis men starting with the Gay Activists Alliance, while people of color were relegated to the margins of LGBTQ liberation. Today, we continue to see this type of erasure (Stryker, 2008).
As indicated in Hypotheses 2a and 2b, the current study is focused on gender gaps among MH and LGB people. However, there were also significant differences found in MH and LGB comparisons to heterosexual men and women. For liberal ideology, MH men, MH women, bisexual women, gay men, and lesbian women were all significantly more liberal than both heterosexual men and women. MH women and bisexual women were significantly more feminist than both heterosexual men and women. MH men, gay men, lesbian women, and heterosexual women were significantly more feminist than heterosexual men (only). For death penalty support, MH women were less likely to support the death penalty than heterosexual women. Bisexual women and gay men were less likely than both heterosexual men and women to support the death penalty. MH women, bisexual women, and gay men were less likely to support legal abortion than both heterosexual men and women.
References
Baunach, D. M., Burgess, E. O., & Courtney, S. M. (2010). Southern (dis)comfort: Sexual prejudice and contact with gay men and lesbians in the south. Sociological Spectrum, 30(1), 30–64.
Bogle, K. A. (2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus. New York: New York University Press.
Bolzendahl, C., & Brooks, C. (2005). Polarization, secularization, or differences as usual? The denominational cleavage in US social attitudes since the 1970s. The Sociological Quarterly, 46(1), 47–78.
Cantor, D., Fisher, B., Chibnall, S., Townsend, R., Lee, H., Bruce, C., & Thomas, G. (2015). Report on the AAU campus climate survey on sexual assault and sexual misconduct. Rockville, MD: Westat.
Cochran, J. K., & Sanders, B. A. (2009). The gender gap in death penalty support: An exploratory study. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(6), 525–533.
Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Crenshaw, K. W. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity, politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299.
D'Augelli, A. R. (1994). Identity development and sexual orientation: Toward a model of lesbian, gay, and bisexual development. In E. J. Trickett, R. J. Watts, & D. Birman (Eds.), The Jossey-Bass social and behavioral science series. Human diversity: Perspectives on people in context (pp. 312–333). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Davis, N. J., & Robinson, R. V. (1991). Men’s and women’s consciousness of gender inequality: Austria, West Germany, Great Britain, and the United States. American Sociological Review, 72–84.
DeBlaere, C., Brewster, M. E., Bertsch, K. N., DeCarlo, A. L., Kegel, K. A., & Presseau, C. D. (2014). The protective power of collective action for sexual minority women of color: An investigation of multiple discrimination experiences and psychological distress. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38(1), 20–32.
Dugan, J. P., & Yurman, L. (2011). Commonalities and differences among lesbian, gay, and bisexual college students: Considerations for research and practice. Journal of College Student Development, 52(2), 201–216.
Eagly, A. H., Diekman, A. B., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & Koenig, A. M. (2004). Gender gaps in sociopolitical attitudes: A social psychological analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(6), 796.
Evans, N. J., & Broido, E. M. (2002). The experiences of lesbian and bisexual women in college residence halls: Implications for addressing homophobia and heterosexism. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 6(3–4), 29–42.
Friedman, C., & Ayres, M. (2013). Predictors of feminist activism among sexual-minority and heterosexual college women. Journal of Homosexuality, 60(12), 1726–1744.
Friedman, C., & Leaper, C. (2010). Sexual-minority college women's experiences with discrimination: Relations with identity and collective action. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(2), 152–164.
Gallup. (2017). Death penalty: In depth topics a-Z. Retrieved from: https://news.gallup.com/poll/1606/death-penalty.aspx. Accessed 20 Nov 2018.
Gallup. (2018). Abortion: In Depth Topics A-Z. Retrieved from: https://news.gallup.com/poll/1576/abortion.aspx. Accessed 20 Nov 2018.
Greene, B. (1996). Lesbian women of color: Triple jeopardy. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 1(1), 109–147.
Grollman, E. A. (2017). Sexual orientation differences in attitudes about sexuality, race, and gender. Social Science Research, 61, 126–141.
Gumprecht, B. (2003). The American college town. Geographical Review, 93, 51–80.
Harnois, C. E. (2015). Race, ethnicity, sexuality, and women’s political consciousness of gender. Social Psychology Quarterly, 78(4), 365–386.
Harnois, C. E. (2017). Intersectional masculinities and gendered political consciousness: How do race, ethnicity and sexuality shape men’s awareness of gender inequality and support for gender activism? Sex Roles, 77(3–4), 141–154.
Herek, G. M. (1988). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: Correlates and gender differences. Journal of Sex Research, 25(4), 451–477.
Herek, G. M., Norton, A. T., Allen, T. J., & Sims, C. L. (2010). Demographic, psychological, and social characteristics of self-identified lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults in a US probability sample. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 7(3), 176–200.
Hertzog, M. (1996). The lavender vote: Lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals in American electoral politics. New York: NYU Press.
Hillygus, D. S. (2005). The missing link: Exploring the relationship between higher education and political engagement. Political Behavior, 27(1), 25–47.
Howard, K., & Stevens, A. (Eds.). (2000). Out and about campus. Los Angeles: Alyson Publications.
Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy. New York: Cambridge Press.
Kimmel, M. S. (2009). Masculinity as homophobia: Fear, shame, and silence in the construction of gender identity. In A. Ferber, K. Holcomb, & T. Wentling (Eds.), Sex, gender, and sexuality (pp. 58–70). New York: Oxford University Press.
Lewis, G. B., Rogers, M. A., & Sherrill, K. (2011). Lesbian, gay, and bisexual voters in the 2000 US presidential election. Politics & Policy, 39(5), 655–677.
McCreary, D. R. (1994). The male role and avoiding femininity. Sex Roles, 31(9–10), 517–531.
McDaniel, E., & Ellison, C. (2008). God’s party? Race, religion, and partisanship over time. Political Research Quarterly, 61, 180–191.
Patel, C. J., & Johns, L. (2009). Gender role attitudes and attitudes to abortion: Are there gender differences? The Social Science Journal, 46(3), 493–505.
Patel, C. J., & Johns, L. (2009). Gender role attitudes and attitudes to abortion: Are there gender differences? The Social Science Journal, 46(3), 493–505.
Peffley, M., & Hurwitz, J. (2007). Persuasion and resistance: Race and the death penalty in America. American Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 996–1012.
Poynter, K. J. (2016). Safe zones: Training allies of LGBTQIA+ young adults.
Rubin, G. (1984). Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. Social perspectives in Lesbian and Gay Studies; A reader, 100–133.
Rupp, L. J., & Taylor, V. (2010). Straight girls kissing. Contexts, 9(3), 28–32.
Rupp, L. J., Taylor, V., Regev-Messalem, S., Fogarty, A. C., & England, P. (2014). Queer women in the hookup scene: Beyond the closet? Gender & Society, 28(2), 212–235.
Rust, P. (1995). Bisexuality and the challenge to lesbian politics: Sex, loyalty and revolution. New York: NYU Press.
Savin-Williams, R. C., & Vrangalova, Z. (2013). Mostly heterosexual as a distinct sexual orientation group: A systematic review of the empirical evidence. Developmental Review, 33(1), 58–88.
Schaffner, B. F., MacWilliams, M., & Nteta, T. (2017). Hostile sexism, racism denial, and the historic education gap in support for Trump. The 2016 Presidential election: The causes and consequences of a political earthquake, 99.
Schnabel, L. (2018). Sexual orientation and social attitudes. Socius, 4, 2378023118769550.
Schuman, H., & Harding, J. (1963). Sympathetic identification with the underdog. Public Opinion Quarterly, 27(2), 230–241.
Sears, J. (1989). The impact of gender and race on growing up lesbian and gay in the south. NWSA Journal, 1, 422–457.
Sidanius, J., Levin, S., Van Laar, C., & Sears, D. O. (2008). The diversity challenge: Social identity and intergroup relations on the college campus. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Stein, A. (1997). Sex and sensibility: stories of a lesbian generation. University of California Press.
Stryker, S. (2008). Transgender history. New York: Seal Press.
Swank, E. (2018a). Who voted for Hillary Clinton? Sexual identities, gender, and family influences. Journal of LGBT Family Studies, 14(1–2), 21–42.
Swank, E. (2018b). Sexual identities and participation in liberal and conservative social movements. Social Science Research, 74, 176–186.
Swank, E., Fahs, B., & Frost, D. M. (2013). Region, social identities, and disclosure practices as predictors of heterosexist discrimination against sexual minorities in the United States. Sociological Inquiry, 83(2), 238–258.
Szymanski, D. M. (2004). Relations among dimensions of feminism and internalized heterosexism in lesbians and bisexual women. Sex Roles, 51(3–4), 145–159.
Thompson, E. M., & Morgan, E. M. (2008). "Mostly straight" young women: Variations in sexual behavior and identity development. Developmental Psychology, 44(1), 15.
Unnever, J. D., & Cullen, F. (2006). Christian fundamentalism and support for capital punishment. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43, 169–197.
Unnever, J. D., Cullen, F., & Fisher, B. (2005). Empathy and public support for capital punishment. Journal of Crime and Justice, 28, 1–34.
Van Dyke, N. (1998). Hotbeds of activism: Locations of student protest. Social Problems, 45(2), 205–220.
VanVoorhis, C. W., & Morgan, B. L. (2007). Understanding power and rules of thumb for determining sample sizes. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 3(2), 43–50.
Weiss, J. T. (2004). GL vs. BT: The archaeology of biphobia and transphobia within the US gay and lesbian community. Journal of Bisexuality, 3(3–4), 25–55.
Whitaker, L. D. (Ed.). (2008). Voting the gender gap. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
Wilcox, C. (1990). Race differences in abortion attitudes: Some additional evidence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 54(2), 248–255.
Williams, R., & Wittig, M. A. (1997). “I’m not a feminist, but … ”: Factors contributing to the discrepancy between pro-feminist orientation and feminist social identity. Sex Roles, 37(11–12), 885–904.
Worthen, M. G. F. (2012). Understanding college student attitudes toward LGBT individuals. Sociological Focus, 45(4), 285–305.
Worthen, M. G. F. (2013). An argument for separate analyses of attitudes toward lesbian, gay, bisexual men, bisexual women, MtF and FtM transgender individuals. Sex Roles, 68(11–12), 703–723.
Worthen, M. G. F. (2016). Hetero-cis–normativity and the gendering of transphobia. International Journal of Transgenderism, 17(1), 31–57.
Worthen, M. G. F. (2017a). Rape myth acceptance among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and mostly heterosexual college students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence.
Worthen, M. G. F. (2017b). “Gay equals white”? Racial, ethnic, and sexual identities and attitudes toward LGBT individuals among college students at a bible belt university. The Journal of Sex Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2017.1378309.
Worthen, M. G. F., Rodgers, F. R., & Sharp, S. F. (2014). Expanding the spectrum of attitudes toward the death penalty: How nondichotomous response options affect our understandings of death penalty attitudes. Criminal Justice Review, 39(2), 160–181.
Worthen, M. G. F., Sharp, S. F., & Rodgers, F. R. (2012). Gay and lesbian individuals’ attitudes toward the death penalty: An exploratory study of the roles of empathic concern and political beliefs. Criminal Justice Review, 37(2), 239–261.
Funding
Support for this research was supported by funding awarded to the author from The University of Oklahoma Department of Sociology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Worthen, M.G.F. “All the Gays Are Liberal?” Sexuality and Gender Gaps in Political Perspectives among Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Mostly Heterosexual, and Heterosexual College Students in the Southern USA. Sex Res Soc Policy 17, 27–42 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-018-0365-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-018-0365-6