Advertisement

“All the Gays Are Liberal?” Sexuality and Gender Gaps in Political Perspectives among Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Mostly Heterosexual, and Heterosexual College Students in the Southern USA

  • Meredith G. F. Worthen
Article

Abstract

Despite the stereotype that “all the gays are liberal,” sexual identity (sexual orientation) has largely been overlooked in explorations of political attitudes save a handful of studies. The existing research indicates that lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) people tend to be more liberal than heterosexuals, supporting a “sexuality gap” in liberalism; however, there is significantly less work focused on LGB attitudes toward specific politicized topics, even less research that investigates the role of gender in these relationships, and no existing studies focusing on mostly heterosexuals’ (MH) political attitudes. The current study explores sexuality and gender gaps in political perspectives among college students enrolled at a university in the southern USA (N = 1940). Specifically, sexual identity (lesbian, gay, bisexual, mostly heterosexual, and heterosexual); gender (man/woman); and the intersections among sexual identity and gender are explored as they relate to politicized perspectives (liberal ideology and feminist identity) and support of politicized issues (death penalty and legal abortion). It is hypothesized that liberal social justice perspectives may be particularly common among LGB people as a group and perhaps especially among lesbian and bisexual women due to their multiple oppressed identities. Results confirm sexuality gaps (heterosexual-LGB, MH-LGB, and B-LG) as well as gender gaps among MH and LGB students (MH women-MH men, bisexual women-bisexual men, gay men-lesbian women), though some gaps (B-LG and G-L) are in the opposite direction from expected. In addition, there is evidence of a bisexual woman consciousness that relates to strong liberalism among bisexual college women. Overall, this research seeks to fill the gaps in the literature, expand our knowledge about sexuality and gender gaps in political attitudes, and contribute to new lines of inquiry that focus on MH and LGB people’s perspectives. In doing so, the current study works toward a deeper understanding of ways college students can promote political change and advocate for social justice.

Keywords

Liberal Politics Gender gap Sexuality gap Lesbian Gay Bisexual Mostly heterosexual Heterosexual College students Social justice 

Notes

Funding

Support for this research was supported by funding awarded to the author from The University of Oklahoma Department of Sociology.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Baunach, D. M., Burgess, E. O., & Courtney, S. M. (2010). Southern (dis)comfort: Sexual prejudice and contact with gay men and lesbians in the south. Sociological Spectrum, 30(1), 30–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bogle, K. A. (2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bolzendahl, C., & Brooks, C. (2005). Polarization, secularization, or differences as usual? The denominational cleavage in US social attitudes since the 1970s. The Sociological Quarterly, 46(1), 47–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cantor, D., Fisher, B., Chibnall, S., Townsend, R., Lee, H., Bruce, C., & Thomas, G. (2015). Report on the AAU campus climate survey on sexual assault and sexual misconduct. Rockville, MD: Westat.Google Scholar
  5. Cochran, J. K., & Sanders, B. A. (2009). The gender gap in death penalty support: An exploratory study. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(6), 525–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Crenshaw, K. W. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity, politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. D'Augelli, A. R. (1994). Identity development and sexual orientation: Toward a model of lesbian, gay, and bisexual development. In E. J. Trickett, R. J. Watts, & D. Birman (Eds.), The Jossey-Bass social and behavioral science series. Human diversity: Perspectives on people in context (pp. 312–333). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  9. Davis, N. J., & Robinson, R. V. (1991). Men’s and women’s consciousness of gender inequality: Austria, West Germany, Great Britain, and the United States. American Sociological Review, 72–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DeBlaere, C., Brewster, M. E., Bertsch, K. N., DeCarlo, A. L., Kegel, K. A., & Presseau, C. D. (2014). The protective power of collective action for sexual minority women of color: An investigation of multiple discrimination experiences and psychological distress. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38(1), 20–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dugan, J. P., & Yurman, L. (2011). Commonalities and differences among lesbian, gay, and bisexual college students: Considerations for research and practice. Journal of College Student Development, 52(2), 201–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eagly, A. H., Diekman, A. B., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & Koenig, A. M. (2004). Gender gaps in sociopolitical attitudes: A social psychological analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(6), 796.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Evans, N. J., & Broido, E. M. (2002). The experiences of lesbian and bisexual women in college residence halls: Implications for addressing homophobia and heterosexism. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 6(3–4), 29–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Friedman, C., & Ayres, M. (2013). Predictors of feminist activism among sexual-minority and heterosexual college women. Journal of Homosexuality, 60(12), 1726–1744.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Friedman, C., & Leaper, C. (2010). Sexual-minority college women's experiences with discrimination: Relations with identity and collective action. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(2), 152–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gallup. (2017). Death penalty: In depth topics a-Z. Retrieved from: https://news.gallup.com/poll/1606/death-penalty.aspx. Accessed 20 Nov 2018.
  17. Gallup. (2018). Abortion: In Depth Topics A-Z. Retrieved from: https://news.gallup.com/poll/1576/abortion.aspx. Accessed 20 Nov 2018.
  18. Greene, B. (1996). Lesbian women of color: Triple jeopardy. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 1(1), 109–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grollman, E. A. (2017). Sexual orientation differences in attitudes about sexuality, race, and gender. Social Science Research, 61, 126–141.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gumprecht, B. (2003). The American college town. Geographical Review, 93, 51–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harnois, C. E. (2015). Race, ethnicity, sexuality, and women’s political consciousness of gender. Social Psychology Quarterly, 78(4), 365–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harnois, C. E. (2017). Intersectional masculinities and gendered political consciousness: How do race, ethnicity and sexuality shape men’s awareness of gender inequality and support for gender activism? Sex Roles, 77(3–4), 141–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Herek, G. M. (1988). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: Correlates and gender differences. Journal of Sex Research, 25(4), 451–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Herek, G. M., Norton, A. T., Allen, T. J., & Sims, C. L. (2010). Demographic, psychological, and social characteristics of self-identified lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults in a US probability sample. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 7(3), 176–200.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hertzog, M. (1996). The lavender vote: Lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals in American electoral politics. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hillygus, D. S. (2005). The missing link: Exploring the relationship between higher education and political engagement. Political Behavior, 27(1), 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Howard, K., & Stevens, A. (Eds.). (2000). Out and about campus. Los Angeles: Alyson Publications.Google Scholar
  28. Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy. New York: Cambridge Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kimmel, M. S. (2009). Masculinity as homophobia: Fear, shame, and silence in the construction of gender identity. In A. Ferber, K. Holcomb, & T. Wentling (Eds.), Sex, gender, and sexuality (pp. 58–70). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Lewis, G. B., Rogers, M. A., & Sherrill, K. (2011). Lesbian, gay, and bisexual voters in the 2000 US presidential election. Politics & Policy, 39(5), 655–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McCreary, D. R. (1994). The male role and avoiding femininity. Sex Roles, 31(9–10), 517–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McDaniel, E., & Ellison, C. (2008). God’s party? Race, religion, and partisanship over time. Political Research Quarterly, 61, 180–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Patel, C. J., & Johns, L. (2009). Gender role attitudes and attitudes to abortion: Are there gender differences? The Social Science Journal, 46(3), 493–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Patel, C. J., & Johns, L. (2009). Gender role attitudes and attitudes to abortion: Are there gender differences? The Social Science Journal, 46(3), 493–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Peffley, M., & Hurwitz, J. (2007). Persuasion and resistance: Race and the death penalty in America. American Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 996–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Poynter, K. J. (2016). Safe zones: Training allies of LGBTQIA+ young adults.Google Scholar
  37. Rubin, G. (1984). Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. Social perspectives in Lesbian and Gay Studies; A reader, 100–133.Google Scholar
  38. Rupp, L. J., & Taylor, V. (2010). Straight girls kissing. Contexts, 9(3), 28–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rupp, L. J., Taylor, V., Regev-Messalem, S., Fogarty, A. C., & England, P. (2014). Queer women in the hookup scene: Beyond the closet? Gender & Society, 28(2), 212–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rust, P. (1995). Bisexuality and the challenge to lesbian politics: Sex, loyalty and revolution. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  41. Savin-Williams, R. C., & Vrangalova, Z. (2013). Mostly heterosexual as a distinct sexual orientation group: A systematic review of the empirical evidence. Developmental Review, 33(1), 58–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schaffner, B. F., MacWilliams, M., & Nteta, T. (2017). Hostile sexism, racism denial, and the historic education gap in support for Trump. The 2016 Presidential election: The causes and consequences of a political earthquake, 99.Google Scholar
  43. Schnabel, L. (2018). Sexual orientation and social attitudes. Socius, 4, 2378023118769550.Google Scholar
  44. Schuman, H., & Harding, J. (1963). Sympathetic identification with the underdog. Public Opinion Quarterly, 27(2), 230–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sears, J. (1989). The impact of gender and race on growing up lesbian and gay in the south. NWSA Journal, 1, 422–457.Google Scholar
  46. Sidanius, J., Levin, S., Van Laar, C., & Sears, D. O. (2008). The diversity challenge: Social identity and intergroup relations on the college campus. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  47. Stein, A. (1997). Sex and sensibility: stories of a lesbian generation. University of California Press.Google Scholar
  48. Stryker, S. (2008). Transgender history. New York: Seal Press.Google Scholar
  49. Swank, E. (2018a). Who voted for Hillary Clinton? Sexual identities, gender, and family influences. Journal of LGBT Family Studies, 14(1–2), 21–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Swank, E. (2018b). Sexual identities and participation in liberal and conservative social movements. Social Science Research, 74, 176–186.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Swank, E., Fahs, B., & Frost, D. M. (2013). Region, social identities, and disclosure practices as predictors of heterosexist discrimination against sexual minorities in the United States. Sociological Inquiry, 83(2), 238–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Szymanski, D. M. (2004). Relations among dimensions of feminism and internalized heterosexism in lesbians and bisexual women. Sex Roles, 51(3–4), 145–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Thompson, E. M., & Morgan, E. M. (2008). "Mostly straight" young women: Variations in sexual behavior and identity development. Developmental Psychology, 44(1), 15.Google Scholar
  54. Unnever, J. D., & Cullen, F. (2006). Christian fundamentalism and support for capital punishment. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43, 169–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Unnever, J. D., Cullen, F., & Fisher, B. (2005). Empathy and public support for capital punishment. Journal of Crime and Justice, 28, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Van Dyke, N. (1998). Hotbeds of activism: Locations of student protest. Social Problems, 45(2), 205–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. VanVoorhis, C. W., & Morgan, B. L. (2007). Understanding power and rules of thumb for determining sample sizes. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 3(2), 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Weiss, J. T. (2004). GL vs. BT: The archaeology of biphobia and transphobia within the US gay and lesbian community. Journal of Bisexuality, 3(3–4), 25–55.Google Scholar
  59. Whitaker, L. D. (Ed.). (2008). Voting the gender gap. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  60. Wilcox, C. (1990). Race differences in abortion attitudes: Some additional evidence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 54(2), 248–255.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Williams, R., & Wittig, M. A. (1997). “I’m not a feminist, but … ”: Factors contributing to the discrepancy between pro-feminist orientation and feminist social identity. Sex Roles, 37(11–12), 885–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Worthen, M. G. F. (2012). Understanding college student attitudes toward LGBT individuals. Sociological Focus, 45(4), 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Worthen, M. G. F. (2013). An argument for separate analyses of attitudes toward lesbian, gay, bisexual men, bisexual women, MtF and FtM transgender individuals. Sex Roles, 68(11–12), 703–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Worthen, M. G. F. (2016). Hetero-cis–normativity and the gendering of transphobia. International Journal of Transgenderism, 17(1), 31–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Worthen, M. G. F. (2017a). Rape myth acceptance among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and mostly heterosexual college students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence.Google Scholar
  66. Worthen, M. G. F. (2017b). “Gay equals white”? Racial, ethnic, and sexual identities and attitudes toward LGBT individuals among college students at a bible belt university. The Journal of Sex Research.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2017.1378309.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Worthen, M. G. F., Rodgers, F. R., & Sharp, S. F. (2014). Expanding the spectrum of attitudes toward the death penalty: How nondichotomous response options affect our understandings of death penalty attitudes. Criminal Justice Review, 39(2), 160–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Worthen, M. G. F., Sharp, S. F., & Rodgers, F. R. (2012). Gay and lesbian individuals’ attitudes toward the death penalty: An exploratory study of the roles of empathic concern and political beliefs. Criminal Justice Review, 37(2), 239–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA

Personalised recommendations