Abstract
In 2016, the Italian Parliament passed a law that extended to same-sex couples most of the rights of married heterosexual couples. However, the possibility of a partner in a same-sex couple adopting the biological children of the other partner was so controversial that it had to be deleted in order for the law to pass, thus denying lesbian and gay parents the legal protection they need. In this article, we analyze the speeches of Parliamentarians who opposed the section of the bill concerning lesbian and gay parenthood. The empirical analysis shows different discursive strategies deployed by MPs to combat the challenges to the heteronormative family, whose common reference is the hegemonic model of gender which has characterized the resistance of the Catholic Church to the recognition of non-heterosexual reproduction and kinship. Findings highlight that the opposition to the recognition of gay and lesbian parents contributes to reiterating restrictive standards of motherhood and to maintaining the institutionalization of sexualities and reproduction within the patriarchal order. Implications of the research findings for public and social policies are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amâncio, L., & Oliveira, J. M. (2006). Men as individuals, women as sexed category: Implications of symbolic asymmetry for feminist practice and feminist psychology. Feminism & Psychology, 16, 35–43.
Bernini, S. (2008). Family politics: Political rhetoric and the transformation of family life in the Italian Second Republic. Journal of Modern Italian Studies, 13(3), 305–324.
Bernstein, M., & Reiman, R. (2001). Queer families and the politics of visibility. In D. Berkowitz & R. Reiman (Eds.), Queer families, queer politics (pp. 1–17). New York: Columbia University Press.
Bertone, C. (2017). Good and healthy parents: Non-heterosexual parenting and tricky alliances. Italian Sociological Review, 7(3), 351–367.
Bertone, C., & Franchi, M. (2014). Suffering as the path to acceptance: Parents of gay and lesbian young people negotiating Catholicism in Italy. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 10(1–2), 58–78.
Bolzonar, F. (2016). A Christian democratization of politics? The new influence of Catholicism on Italian politics since the demise of the Democrazia Cristiana. Journal of Modern Italian Studies, 21(3), 445–463.
Brandão, A. M., & Machado, T. C. (2012). How equal is equality? Discussions about same-sex marriage in Portugal. Sexualities, 15, 662–678.
Buss, D., & Herman, D. (2003). Globalizing family values: The Christian right in international politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
Butler, J. (1998). Merely cultural. New Left Review, 227, 33–44.
Butler, J. (2002). Is kinship always already heterosexual? Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 13(1), 14–44.
Butler, J. (2004) Undoing gender. New York. NY: Routledge.
CEI (2007). Nota del Consiglio Episcopale Permanente a riguardo della famiglia fondata sul matrimonio e di iniziative legislative in materia di unioni di fatto. Rome, 28 March 2007. Retrieved from http://banchedati.chiesacattolica.it/documenti/2007/03/00012553_nota_a_riguardo_della_famiglia_fondata_su.html.
Clarke, V. (2001). “What about the children?” arguments against lesbian and gay parenting. Women’s Studies International Forum, 24(5), 555–570.
Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender & power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Connell, R. W. (2002). Gender. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Connell, R. W. (2009). Gender in world perspective. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Cooper, M., & Waldby, C. (2014). Clinical labor: Tissue donors and research subjects in the global bioeconomy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Costa, P. A., Caldeira, S., Fernandes, I., Rita, C., Pereira, H., & Leal, I. (2014). Religious and political conservatism and beliefs about same-sex parenting in Portugal. Psychology, Community & Health, 3, 23–35.
De Michele, C. (2010). Greece. In: Stewart, C. (ed.) The Greenwood Encyclopedia of LGBT Issues Worldwide, Vol. 2: Europe. Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood Press, pp. 203–218.
Digoix, M., Franchi, M., Pichardo Galán, J. I., Selmi, G., de Stefano Barbero, M., Thibeaud, M., & Vela, J. A. M. (2016). Sexual orientation, family and kinship in France, Iceland, Italy and Spain. Families and Societies Working Papers Series, 54, 1–33.
Fairclough, N. (2001). Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 121–138). London: Sage.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
Fassin, E. (2010). Celibate priests, continent homosexuals: What the exclusion of gay (and gay-friendly) men from priesthood reveals about the political nature of the Roman Catholic Church. Borderlands, 9(3), 1–20.
Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality. Vol. 1: An introduction. London: Penguin.
Fuwa, M. (2004). Macro-level gender inequality and the division of household labor in 22 countries. American Sociological Review, 69, 751–767.
Garbagnoli, S. (2014). ‘L’ideologia del genere’: l’irresistibile ascesa di un’invenzione retorica vaticana contro la denaturalizzazione dell’ordine sessuale. About Gender, 3(6), 250–263.
Garelli, F. (2007). The church and Catholicism in contemporary Italy. Journal of Modern Italian Studies, 12(1), 2–7.
Gazzetta Ufficiale. (1985). Legge 25 marzo 1985, n. 121. Ratifica ed esecuzione dell’accordo con protocollo addizionale che apporta modifiche al Concordato. Gazzetta Ufficiale, n. 85, 10 April.
Gazzetta Ufficiale. (2004). Legge 20 maggio 2004, n. 40. Norme in materia di procreazione medicalmente assistita. Gazzetta Ufficiale, n. 45, 24 February.
Gazzetta Ufficiale. (2016). Legge 20 maggio 2016, n. 76. Regolamentazione delle unioni civili tra persone dello stesso sesso e disciplina delle convivenze. Gazzetta Ufficiale, n. 118, 21 May.
Ginsborg, P. (2013). Famiglia Novecento. Vita Familiare, Rivoluzione e Dittature. 1900–1950. Torino: Einaudi.
Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Hicks, S. (2005). Is gay parenting bad for kids? Responding to the ‘very idea of difference’ in research on lesbian and gay parents. Sexualities, 8(2), 153–168.
Hicks, S. (2013). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender parents and the question of gender. In A. E. Goldberg & K. R. Allen (Eds.), LGBT-parent families: Innovations in research and implications for practice (pp. 149–162). New York: Springer.
Holy See. (1995). Holy See’s final statement at women’s conference in Beijing. Retrieved from http://www.its.caltech.edu/~nmcenter/women-cp/beijing3.html
Kitzinger, C. (2005). Heteronormativity in action: Reproducing the heterosexual nuclear family in after-hours medical calls. Social Problems, 52(4), 477–498.
Lasio, D. & Serri, F. (2017). The Italian public debate on same-sex civil unions and lesbian and gay parenting. Sexualities. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460717713386.
Mamo, L., & Alston-Stepnitz, E. (2015). Queer intimacies and structural inequalities: New directions in stratified reproduction. Journal of Family Issues, 36(4), 519–540.
Parolin, L. L., & Perrotta, M. (2012). On the fringes of parenthood: Othering and otherness in Italian assisted kinship. About Gender, 1(2), 100–131.
Pereira, H., & Monteiro, S. (2017). The role of political and legislative changes in the everyday lives of LGB individuals: The case of Portugal. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 14(3), 300–309.
Pistella, J., Tanzilli, A., Ioverno, S., Lingiardi, V., & Baiocco, R. (2018). Sexism and attitudes toward same-sex parenting in a sample of heterosexuals and sexual minorities: The mediation effect of sexual stigma. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 15(2), 139–150.
Pope John Paul II. (1988). Mulieris dignitatem. London: Catholic Truth Society.
Ratzinger, J. (2004). Letter to the bishops of the Catholic Church on the collaboration of men and women in the Church and in the world. Retrieved from http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20040731_collaboration_en.html
Rich, A. (1977). Of woman born: Motherhood as experience and institution. New York: W. W. Norton.
Rickett, B. (2016). Feminist psychology: Poststructuralism, class and maternal subjectivities: Where are we and where should we go next? Feminism and Psychology, 26(3), 320–326.
Ridgeway, C. (2011). Framed by gender: How gender inequality persists in the modern world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Robcis, C. (2015). Catholics, the “theory of gender,” and the turn to the human in France: A new Dreyfus Affair? Journal of Modern History, 87, 892–923.
Romans, P. (1992). Daring to pretend? Motherhood and lesbianism. In K. Plummer (Ed.), Modern homosexualities: Fragments of lesbian and gay experience (pp. 98–107). London: Routledge.
Roseneil, S., Crowhurst, I., Hellesund, T., Hellesund, T., Santos, A. C., & Stoilova, M. (2013). Changing landscapes of heteronormativity: The regulation and normalization of same-sex sexualities in Europe. Social Politics, 20(2), 165–199.
Rosky, C. (2013). Fear of the queer child. Buffalo Law Review, 61, 607–697.
Rubin, G. (1975). The traffic in women: Notes on the “political economy” of sex. In R. R. Reiter (Ed.), Toward an anthropology of women (pp. 157–210). New York: Monthly Review Press.
Santos, C. (2013). Social movements and sexual citizenship in southern Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Segal, L. (1999). Why feminism? Cambridge: Polity.
Segal, L. (2007). Slow motion: Changing masculinities. London: Palgrave Press.
Seidman, S. (2002). Beyond the closet: The transformation of gay and lesbian life. New York and London: Routledge.
Senato della Repubblica. (2007). Disegno di Legge n.1339 (Diritti e doveri delle persone stabilmente conviventi). XV Legislatura, 20 febbraio 2007.
Senato della Repubblica. (2015). Disegno di Legge n.2081 (Regolamentazione delle unioni civili tra persone dello stesso sesso e disciplina delle convivenze). XVII Legislatura, 6 ottobre 2015.
Shields, S. A. (1975). Functionalism, Darwinism, and the psychology of women: A study in social myth. American Psychologist, 30, 739–754.
Staikou, E. (2014). Generative grafting. Reproductive technology and the dilemmas of surrogacy. Radical Philosophy, 183, 40–46.
Warner, M. (1991). Introduction: Fear of a queer planet. Social Text, 29, 3–17.
Weeks, J. (2007). The world we have won: The remaking of erotic and intimate life. London: Routledge.
Weston, K. (1991). Families we choose: Lesbians, gays, kinship. New York: Columbia University Press.
Witt, C. (2005). Family resemblances: Adoption, personal identity, and genetic essentialism. In S. Haslanger & C. Witt (Eds.), Adoption matters: Philosophical and feminist essays (pp. 135–145). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Witt, C. (2014). A critique to the bionormative concept of the family. In F. Baylis & C. McLeod (Eds.), Familymaking.Contemporary ethical challenges (pp.49–63). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Zappino, F. (2016). Introduzione. In F. Zappino (Ed.), Il genere tra neoliberismo e neofondamentalismo (pp. 7–18). Verona: Ombre Corte.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lasio, D., Congiargiu, N., De Simone, S. et al. Gender Fundamentalism and Heteronormativity in the Political Discussion About Lesbian and Gay Parenthood. Sex Res Soc Policy 16, 501–512 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-018-0350-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-018-0350-0