Advertisement

Transgender Under Fire: Hetero-cis-normativity and Military Students’ Attitudes Toward Trans Issues and Trans Service Members Post DADT

Article

Abstract

The repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, Don’t Pursue” (DADT) was a victory for lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) military members but left most transgender (trans) military members closeted and failed to address trans military inclusion. The purpose of the current study is to explore military students’ attitudes toward trans issues and trans service members in the year 2012 (post DADT) through a framework of hetero-cis-normativity: a system of prejudice whereby it is “normal” to be both heterosexual and cisgender and it is not normal (and therefore acceptable to be prejudiced toward) non-heterosexual and non-cisgender individuals. Specifically, this study utilizes both closed- and open-ended survey responses from a college student sample of active and veteran members of the United States Reserve Officer Training Core (ROTC) and/or United States Armed Forces (Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, Coast Guard, National Guard, and Reserves) enrolled at a southern US university (N = 374) to understand how gender, infantry/combat military occupation, and combat zone deployment (and interactions among these) as well as feminist identity and LGB supportive attitudes play a role in military students’ attitudes toward trans men and women, perspectives about gender-affirming surgeries (i.e., “sex change operations”), and opinions about trans individuals serving openly in the U.S. Armed Forces in the immediate aftermath of the DADT repeal. Consistent with the hetero-cis-normativity framework, both the qualitative and quantitative findings revealed that being a woman, being a feminist, being supportive of gay and bisexual men, infantry/combat military occupation, and combat zone deployment were all significantly related to military students’ trans perspectives. In addition, the qualitative findings situated military students across a spectrum of support of trans military service, with most students overall in the “do nothing to help trans people serve” category but a large percentage of women and LGB respondents comprising the “do more to help trans people serve” category. Implications for future research and policy recommendations are provided.

Keywords

Military Transgender Gay Lesbian Bisexual Feminism Combat Infantry Deployment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This manuscript is dedicated to the hundreds of thousands of trans service members who have served, who are currently serving, and who will serve in the armed forces. We are forever indebted to you for your strength and service.

Funding

Support for this research was supported by funding awarded to Meredith G. F. Worthen from The University of Oklahoma Department of Sociology.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Alford, B., & Lee, S. (2016). Toward complete inclusion: Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender military service members after repeal of don’t ask, don’t tell. Social Work, 61, 257–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allsep, L. M. (2013). The myth of the warrior: Martial masculinity and the end of don’t ask, don’t tell. Journal of Homosexuality, 60, 381–400.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey, B. (2013). The politics of dancing: “Don’t ask, don’t tell,” and the role of moral claims. Journal of Policy History, 25, 89–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bender, J., Kiersz, A., & Rosen, A. (2014). US military is not representative of country. Business Insider. Retrieved from: http://www.businessinsider.com/us-military-is-not-representativeof-country-2014-7. Accessed 24 May 2018.
  5. Bestforvets.com. (2014). Best for vets: Colleges 2014, 4-year schools. Military Times. Retrieved from: http://bestforvets.militarytimes.com/2014/colleges/4-year/
  6. Bortolin, S. (2010). “I don’t want him hitting on me”: The role of masculinities in creating a chilly climate. Journal of LGBT Youth, 7, 200–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Britton, D. M., & Williams, C. L. (1995). “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, Don’t Pursue”: Military policy and the construction of heterosexual masculinity. Journal of Homosexuality, 30(1), 1–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bryant, K., & Schilt, K. (2008). Transgender people in the U.S. military: Summary and analysis of the 2008 Transgender American Veterans Association Survey. Santa Barbara, CA: Palm Center.Google Scholar
  9. Bump, P. (2017). Trump’s argument against transgender soldiers echoes one used against gays, women and blacks. Washington Post. Retrieved from: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2017/07/26/trumps-argument-against-transgender-soldiers-echoes-one-used-against-gays-women-and-blacks/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.e305eac343c6
  10. Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Connell, R. (2012). Transsexual women and feminist thought: Toward new understanding and new politics. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 37, 857–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Connell, C. (2017a). ‘Different than an infantry unit down in Georgia’: Metronormativity in the homophobia narratives of Boston area ROTC cadets. In Sexualities: Online first.Google Scholar
  13. Connell, C. (2017b). Now that we can ask and tell: The social movement legacy of the DADT repeal. Sociology Compass, 11(9), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders I-V (1952, 1968, 1974, 1980, 1994, 2013). Washington: APA.Google Scholar
  15. Diamond, J. (2017). Trump signs directive banning transgender military recruits. CNN Politics. Retrieved from: http://www.cnn.com/2017/08/25/politics/trump-transgender-military/index.html
  16. Dietert, M., & Dentice, D. (2015). The transgender military experience: Their battle for workplace rights. Journal of Workplace Rights, 5(2), 1–12.Google Scholar
  17. DoD. (2012). 2012 demographics: Profile of the military community. Retrieved from: http://download.militaryonesource.mil/12038/MOS/Reports/2012_Demographics_Report.pdf
  18. DoD. (2016). Transgender service in the U.S. military: An implementation handbook. Retrieved from: https://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/features/2016/0616_policy/DoDTGHandbook_093016.pdf
  19. Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, 10 U.S.C. § 654 (1993) (Repealed 2010).Google Scholar
  20. Elders, J., Brown, G., Coleman, E., Kolditz, T., & Steinman, A. (2015). Medical aspects of transgender military service. Armed Forces & Society, 41(2), 199–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eliason, M. J. (1997). The prevalence and nature of biphobia in heterosexual undergraduate students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26, 317–326.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ender, M., Rohall, D., & Matthews, M. (2016). Cadet and civilian undergraduate attitudes toward transgender people: A research note. Armed Forces & Society, 42(2), 427–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ender, M. G., Ryan, D. M., Nuszkowski, D. A., Spell, E. S., & Atkins, C. B. (2017). Dinner and a conversation: Transgender integration at West Point and beyond. Social Sciences, 6(1), 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gagné, P., Tewksbury, R., & McGaughey, D. (1997). Coming out and crossing over: Identity formation and proclamation in a transgender community. Gender & Society, 11(4), 478–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gates, G., & Herman, J. (2014). Transgender military service in the United States. Los Angeles: Williams Institute.Google Scholar
  26. Gerhardstein, K., & Anderson, V. (2010). There’s more than meets the eye: Facial appearance and evaluations of transsexual people. Sex Roles, 62(5–6), 361–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goldstein, J. (2001). War and gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Gurung, S., Ventuneac, A., Rendina, H. J., Savarese, E., Grov, C., & Parsons, J. T. (2018). Prevalence of military sexual trauma and sexual orientation discrimination among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender military personnel: A descriptive study. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 15(1), 74–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Herek, G. (2002). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward bisexual men, and bisexual women in the United States. The Journal of Sex Research, 39, 264–274.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Heyes, C. (2003). Feminist solidarity after queer theory: The case of transgender. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28, 1093–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hill, D. B., & Willoughby, B. L. (2005). The development and validation of the genderism and transphobia scale. Sex Roles, 53, 531–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hill, B. J., Bouris, A., Barnett, J. T., & Walker, D. (2016). Fit to serve? Exploring mental and physical health and well-being among transgender active-duty service members and veterans in the US Military. Transgender Health, 1(1), 4–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. James, S. E., Herman, J. L., Rankin, S., Keisling, M., Mottet, L., & Anafi, M. (2016). The report of the 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Transgender Equality.Google Scholar
  34. Kerrigan, M. (2012). Transgender discrimination in the military: The new don’t ask, don’t tell. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 18(3), 500–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kimmel, M. S. (2009). Masculinity as homophobia: Fear, shame, and silence in the construction of gender identity. In A. Ferber, K. Holcomb, & T. Wentling (Eds.), Sex, gender, and sexuality (pp. 58–70). NY: Oxford Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kube, C. (2017). Pentagon to pay for surgery for transgender soldier. NBC News. Retreived from: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/pentagon-oks-surgery-transgender-soldiermilitary-hospital-n820721.
  37. Landén, M., & Innala, S. (2000). Attitudes toward transsexualism in a Swedish National Survey. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 29, 375–388.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Larson, G., Highfill-McRoy, R., & Booth-Kewley. (2008). Psychiatric diagnoses in historic and contemporary military cohorts: Combat deployment and the healthy warrior effect. American Journal of Epidemiology, 167, 1269–1276.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. LeardMann, C. A., Pietrucha, A., Magruder, K. M., Smith, B., Murdoch, M., Jacobson, I. G., et al. (2013). Combat deployment is associated with sexual harassment or sexual assault in a large, female military cohort. Women’s health issues, 23(4), e215–e223.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Louderback, L., & Whitley, B. (1997). Perceived erotic value of homosexuality and sex-role attitudes as mediators of sex differences in heterosexual college students’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. Journal of Sex Research, 34, 175–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Millett, K. (1970). Sexual politics. New York, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  42. Mock, E. (2017). Getting comfortable: Sex, reading, and postwar adjustment in 1950s Playboy. Popular Culture, 50, 363–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mohr, J., & Rochlen, A. (1999). Measuring attitudes regarding bisexuality in lesbian, gay male, and heterosexual populations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46, 353–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Morris, M. (1996). By force of arms: Rape, war, and military culture. Duke Law Journal, 45, 651–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nagoshi, J., Adams, K., Terrell, H., Hill, E., Brzuzy, S., & Nagoshi, C. (2008). Gender differences in correlates of homophobia and transphobia. Sex Roles, 59, 521–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Norton, A., & Herek, G. (2013). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward transgender people: Findings from a national probability sample of U.S. adults. Sex Roles, 68(11), 738–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Parco, J., Levy, D., & Spears, S. (2015). Transgender military personnel in the post-DADT repeal era: A phenomenological study. Armed Forces & Society, 41(2), 221–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Quam, K. (2015). Unfinished business of repealing Don't Ask, Don't Tell: The military’s unconstitutional ban on transgender individuals. Utah Law Review, 721.Google Scholar
  49. Raja, S., & Stokes, J. P. (1998). Assessing attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: The modern homophobia scale. International Journal of Sexuality and Gender Studies, 3, 113–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rohall, D., Ender, M., & Matthews, M. (2017). Inclusion in the American military: A force for diversity. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  51. Rosenberg, M. & Phillips, D. (2015). All combat roles now open to women, defense secretary says. New York Times. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/04/us/politics/combat-military-women-ash-carter.html?mcubz=0
  52. Rosenstein, J. (2017). The integration of trans people into the military. In D. Rohall, M. Ender, & M. Matthews (Eds.), Inclusion in the American military: A force for diversity (pp. 149–167). Lanham, MD: Lexington books.Google Scholar
  53. Ross, A. (2014). The invisible army: Why the military needs to rescind its ban on transgender service members. Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal, 23, 185–222.Google Scholar
  54. Schilt, K. & Westbrook, L. (2009). Doing gender, doing heteronormativity: ‘Gender normals,’ transgender people, and the social maintenance of heterosexuality. Gender & Society, 23, 440–464.Google Scholar
  55. Scott-Dixon, K. (2006). Trans/forming feminisms: Transfeminist voices speak out. Toronto: Sumach Press.Google Scholar
  56. Seck, H. (2018). New Trump transgender military policy bars those with gender dysphoria. Military.com Retrieved from: https://www.military.com/daily-news/2018/03/23/new-trump-transgender-military-policy-bars-those-gender-dysphoria.html
  57. Secretary of Defense (2018). Military service by transgender individuals. Retrieved from: https://media.defense.gov/2018/Mar/23/2001894037/-1/-1/0/MILITARY-SERVICE-BY-TRANSGENDER-INDIVIDUALS.PDF
  58. Serano, J. (2007). Whipping girl. Berkeley, CA: Seal Press.Google Scholar
  59. Serrano, L. (2014). Why women do not belong in the U.S. infantry. Marine Corps Gazette, 98, 36–40.Google Scholar
  60. U.S. Census Bureau. 2012. Veteran status: 2012 American community survey 1-year estimates. https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk
  61. Watjen, J., & Mitchell, R. (2012). College men’s concerns about sharing dormitory space with a male-to-female transsexual. Sexuality & Culture, 17(1), 132–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Weinberg, G. (1972). Society and the healthy homosexual. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  63. Weitz, R. (2015). Vulnerable warriors: Military women, military culture, and fear of rape. Gender Issues, 32, 164–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Westbrook, L., & Schilt, K. (2014). Doing gender, determining gender: Transgender people, gender panics, and the maintenance of the sex/gender/sexuality system. Gender & Society, 28(1), 32–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Williams, R., & Wittig, M. (1997). “I’m not a feminist, but…”: Factors contributing to the discrepancy between pro-feminist orientation and feminist social identity. Sex Roles, 37(11/12), 885–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Worthen, M. G. F. (2012). Heterosexual college student sexual experiences, feminist identity, and attitudes toward LGBT individuals. Journal of LGBT Youth, 9, 77–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Worthen, M. G. F. (2013). An argument for separate analyses of attitudes toward lesbian, gay, bisexual men, bisexual women, MtF and FtM transgender individuals. Sex Roles, 68, 703–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Worthen, M. G. F. (2016). Hetero-cis–normativity and the gendering of transphobia. International Journal of Transgenderism, 17, 31–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Yerke, A. F., & Mitchell, V. (2013). Transgender people in the military: Don’t ask? Don’t tell? Don’t enlist!. Journal of Homosexuality, 60(2–3), 436–457.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA

Personalised recommendations