Advertisement

Intimate Labour and the State: Contrasting Policy Discourses with the Working Experiences of Indoor Sex Workers

  • Jane PitcherEmail author
Article

Abstract

Drawing on an interview-based study with indoor-based sex workers of different genders in Great Britain, this paper explores the disparity between dominant policy representations of sex workers and the working lives of people selling intimate services. I argue certain policy discourses reinforce narratives of vulnerability and coercion when discussing female sex workers and responses to perceived ‘problems’ of prostitution and neglect the needs of male and transgender sex workers. I contrast messages in policy discourses with the experiences of sex workers across indoor sectors. My study found considerable diversity in working experiences, influenced by factors such as work setting, personal circumstances and aspirations. While some people may view sex work as a short-term option, for others it represents a longer-term career. For some, sex work may offer greater job satisfaction and control over working conditions than other jobs available. Nonetheless, external constraints sometimes make it difficult for them to work safely. I argue state discourses fail to reflect the diverse experiences of sex workers and undermine their agency, perpetuating disrespect and excluding them from human and labour rights. I suggest the need to consider policy approaches shaped according to varied circumstances and settings, drawing on the expertise of sex workers.

Keywords

Sex work Prostitution Labour relations Policy Stigma Recognition Diversity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am very grateful to all the participants who contributed to my research. I would also like to thank the two anonymous peer reviewers for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this article.

Funding

The research on which this article draws was funded by the ESRC (grant no. ES/H012192/1).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The research study was approved by Loughborough University’s Research Ethics Committee. The processes were guided by the University’s ethical procedures and by confidentiality and informed consent protocols, including those of the British Sociological Association and the Social Research Association. Informed consent was obtained from all study participants. Protocols for informed consent included giving participants a participation information sheet explaining the research and consent form prior to interviews, ensuring they were aware of their rights to withdraw from the research at any point and setting out the conditions for their participation, which included assurances regarding confidentiality of interview data. The study took a participant-focused approach, which included encouraging participants to select their preferred pseudonym, undertaking member checks of interview transcriptions and feeding back preliminary research findings to participants to check validity. Interview participants were each offered a £15 voucher to thank them for giving up their time.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abel, G. M. (2011). Different stage, different performance: The protective strategy of role play on emotional health in sex work. Soc Sci Med, 72, 1177–1184.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Agustín, L. M. (2003). A migrant world of services. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society, 10(3), 377–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. All-Party Parliamentary Group on Prostitution and the Global Sex Trade (APPG). (2014). Shifting the burden: Inquiry to assess the operation of the current legal settlement on prostitution in England and Wales. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  4. Benoit, C., Ouellet, N., Jansson, M., Magnus, S., & Smith, M. (2017). Would you think about doing sex for money? Structure and agency in deciding to sell sex in Canada. Work Employ Soc, 31(5), 731–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernstein, E. (2007). Temporarily yours: Intimacy, authenticity and the commerce of sex. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowen, R. (2015). Squaring up: Experiences of transition from off-street sex work to square work and duality—concurrent involvement in both—in Vancouver, BC. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue Canadienne de Sociologie, 52(4), 429–449.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brents, B. G., Jackson, C. A., & Hausbeck, K. (2010). The state of sex: Tourism, sex, and sin in the new American heartland. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Bradley, H., & Devadason, R. (2008). Fractured transitions: Young adults’ pathways into contemporary labour markets. Sociology, 42(1), 119–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bruckert, C., & Parent, C. (2006). The in-call sex industry: Classed and gendered labour on the margins. In G. Balfour & E. Comack (Eds.), Criminalizing women: Gender and (in)justice in neo-liberal times (pp. 95–112). Halifax: Fernwood.Google Scholar
  10. Cabezas, A. L. (2004). Between love and money: Sex, tourism, and citizenship in Cuba and the Dominican Republic. Signs, 29(4), 987–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carline, A. (2011). Criminal justice, extreme pornography and prostitution: Protecting women or promoting morality? Sexualities, 14(3), 312–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Comte, J. (2014). Decriminalization of sex work: Feminist discourses in light of research. Sex Cult, 18(1), 196–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Constable, N. (2009). The commodification of intimacy: Marriage, sex and reproductive labor. Annu Rev Anthropol, 38, 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Day, S. (2010). The re-emergence of ‘trafficking’: Sex work between slavery and freedom. J R Anthropol Inst, 16, 816–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ehrenreich, B. and Hochschild, A. (2002). (Ed.) Global woman: Nannies, maids and sex workers in the new economy. London: Granta.Google Scholar
  17. European Parliament (2014). Resolution of 26 February 2014 on sexual exploitation and prostitution and its impact on gender equality (2013/2103(INI)). Brussels: European Parliament.Google Scholar
  18. Fraser, N. (2003). Social justice in the age of identity politics: Redistribution, recognition, and participation. In N. Fraser & A. Honneth (Eds.), Redistribution or recognition? A political-philosophical exchange (pp. 7–109). London: Verso.Google Scholar
  19. Fraser, N. (2009). Scales of justice: Reimagining political space in a globalising world. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  21. Hallgrímsdóttir, H. K., Phillips, R., Benoit, C. & Walby, K. (2008). Sporting girls, streetwalkers, and inmates of houses of ill repute: Media narratives and the historical mutability of prostitution stigmas. Sociological Perspectives 51(1):119–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hardy, K. (2013). Equal to any other but not the same as any other: The politics of sexual labour, the body and intercorporeality. In C. Wolkowitz, R. L. Cohen, T. Sanders, & K. Hardy (Eds.), Body/sex/work: Intimate, embodied and sexualized labour (pp. 43–58). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Honneth, A. (1995). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  24. House of Commons Home Affairs Committee (2016). Prostitution: Third Report of Session 2016–17. HC 26. London: House of Commons. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmhaff/26/26.pdf.
  25. Kalleberg, A. L. (2009). 2008 presidential address: Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition. Am Sociol Rev, 74, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kilvington, J., Day, S., & Ward, H. (2001). Prostitution policy in Europe: A time of change? Fem Rev, 67, 78–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Levy, J., & Jakobsson, P. (2014). Sweden’s abolitionist discourse and law: Effects on the dynamics of Swedish sex work and on the lives of Sweden’s sex workers. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 14(5), 593–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mai, N. (2009). Migrant workers in the UK sex industry—Final policy-relevant report. ESRC final project report. London: London Metropolitan University.Google Scholar
  29. McCarthy, B., Benoit, C., Jansson, M., & Kolar, K. (2012). Regulating sex work: Heterogeneity in legal strategies. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 8, 255–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McDowell, L. (2009). Working bodies: Interactive service employment and workplace identities. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Munro, V., & Scoular, J. (2012). Abusing vulnerability? Contemporary law and policy responses to sex work in the UK. Fem Leg Stud, 20, 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. O’Neill, M. & Jobe, A. (2016). Policy briefing: Adult sex work, law and policy: New horizons in the 21st century. Discover Society, 39: https://discoversociety.org/2016/12/06/policy-briefing-adult-sex-work-law-and-policy/ . Accessed 30/12/17.
  33. O’Neill, M., & Pitcher, J. (2010). Sex work, communities and public policy in the UK. In M. Ditmore, A. Levy, & A. Willman-Navarro (Eds.), Sex work matters: Beyond divides (pp. 203–218). New York: Zed Press.Google Scholar
  34. Oselin, S. S. (2014). Leaving prostitution: Getting out and staying out of sex work. New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Perkins, R., & Lovejoy, F. (2007). Call girls: Private sex workers in Australia. Crawley: University of Western Australia Press.Google Scholar
  36. Pitcher, J. (2015). Direct sex work in Great Britain: Reflecting diversity. Graduate Journal of Social Sciences, 11(2), 76–100.Google Scholar
  37. Pitcher, J., & Wijers, M. (2014). The impact of different regulatory models on the labour conditions, safety and welfare of indoor-based sex workers. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 14(5), 549–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sanders, T. (2007). Becoming an ex-sex worker: Making transitions out of a deviant career. Fem Criminol, 2(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
  39. Sanders, T., & Campbell, R. (2014). Criminalization, protection and rights: Global tensions in the governance of commercial sex. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 14(5), 535–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sanders, T., Scoular, J., Campbell, R., Pitcher, J., & Cunningham, S. (2018). Internet sex work: Beyond the gaze. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Scambler, G. (2007). Sex work stigma: Opportunist migrants in London. Sociology, 41(6), 1079–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Strathdee, S., Crago, A.-L., Butler, J., Bekker, L.-G., & Beyrer, C. (2015). Dispelling myths about sex workers and HIV. Lancet, 385(9962), 4–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Walby, K. (2012). Touching encounters: sex, work, & male-for-male internet escorting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Weitzer, R. (2009). Sociology of sex work. Annu Rev Sociol, 35, 213–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. World Health Organization. (2012). Prevention and treatment of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections for sex workers in low- and middle-income countries. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
  46. Zelizer, V. A. (2005). The purchase of intimacy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of LawUniversity of StrathclydeGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations