Abstract
Comfort discussing sex with friends may develop over time and may be associated with individual and peer characteristics. The current paper uses longitudinal data to examine the developmental trajectory and between- and within-person correlates of peer sexual communication quality. Participants were 434 college students (52.1% female, 38.7% European American/White, 32.5% African American/Black, 28.8% Latino American/Hispanic; M = 18.0 [SD = 0.4] years old fall of first year) who completed surveys at four semesters. Peer sexual communication quality improved across the college years, and tended to be higher during semesters when late adolescents held less conservative attitudes about sex and communicated about sex more frequently. Additionally, peer sexual communication quality was better among women and late adolescents who were sexually active at more semesters. We discuss implications for peer-led sexual health intervention programs and for theories of normative sexuality development.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development, volume six: Six theories of child development (pp. 1–60). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Carpenter, L. M. (2001). The ambiguity of “having sex”: The subjective experience of virginity loss in the United States. Journal of Sex Research, 38, 127–139.
Byron, P. (2017). Friendship, sexual intimacy, and young people’s negotiations of sexual health. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 19, 486–500.
Cupples, J. B., Zukoski, A. P., & Dierwechter, T. (2010). Reaching young men: Lessons learned in the recruitment, training, and utilization of male peer sexual health educators. Health Promot Pract, 11, 19S–25S.
Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2011). The disaggregation of within-person and between-person effects in longitudinal models of change. Annu Rev Psychol, 62, 583–619.
Davis, D., Shaver, P. R., Widman, K. F., Vernon, M. L., Follette, W. C., & Beitz, K. (2006). “I can’t get no satisfaction”: Insecure attachment, inhibited sexual communication, and sexual dissatisfaction. Pers Relat, 13, 465–483.
DiIorio, C., Dudley, W. N., Lehr, S., & Soet, J. E. (2000). Correlates of safer sex communication among college students. J Adv Nurs, 32, 658–665.
DiIorio, C., Kelley, M., & Hockenberry-Eaton, M. (1999). Communication about sexual issues: Mothers, fathers, and friends. J Adolesc Health, 24, 181–189.
Elliott, S. (2010). Talking to teens about sex: Mothers negotiate resistance, discomfort, and ambivalence. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 7, 310–322.
England, P., Shafer, E. F., & Fogarty, A. C. (2008). Hooking up and forming romantic relationships on today’s college campuses. The Gendered Society Reader, 3, 531–593.
Feldman, S. S., & Rosenthal, D. A. (2000). The effect of communication characteristics on family members’ perceptions of parents as sex educators. J Res Adolesc, 10, 119–150.
Future of Sex Education Initiative. (2012). National sexuality education standards: Core content and skills, K-12 [a special publication of the Journal of School Health]. Retrieved from http://www.futureofsexed.org/documents/josh-fose-standards-web.pdf
Frantz, J. M. (2015). A peer-led approach to promoting health education in schools: The views of peers. South African Journal of Education, 35, 1–7.
Gariépy, J. (1996). The question of continuity and change in development. In R. B. Cairns, G. H. Elder Jr., & E. J. Costello (Eds.), Developmental science (pp. 78–96). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 17.0 update (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Greene, K. (2009). An integrated model of health disclosure decision-making. In T. D. Afifi & W. A. Afifi (Eds.), Uncertainty and information regulation in interpersonal contexts: Theories and applications (pp. 226–253). New York, NY: Routledge.
Guzmán, B. L., Schlehofer-Sutton, M. M., Villanueva, C. M., Stritto, M. E. D., Casad, B. J., & Feria, A. (2003). Let’s talk about sex: How comfortable discussions about sex impact teen sexual behavior. J Health Commun, 8, 583–598.
Harper, G. W., Gannon, C., Watson, S. G., Catania, J. A., & Dolcini, M. M. (2004). The role of close friends in African American adolescents’ dating and sexual behavior. Journal of Sex Research, 41, 351–362.
Herbenick, D., Reece, M., Schick, V., Sanders, S. A., Dodge, B., & Fortenberry, J. D. (2010). Sexual behavior in the United States: Results from a probability sample of men and women ages 14–94. J Sex Med, 7, 255–265.
Holman, A., & Sillars, A. (2012). Talk about “hooking up”: The influence of college student social networks on nonrelationship sex. Health Commun, 27, 205–216.
Howard, A. L. (2015). Leveraging time-varying covariates to test within- and between-person effects and interactions in the multilevel linear model. Emerging Adulthood, 3, 400–412.
Hudson, W. W., Murphy, G. J., & Nurius, P. S. (1983). A short-form scale to measure liberal vs. conservative orientations toward human sexual expression. Journal of Sex Research, 19, 258–272.
Humphris, G. M., & Kaney, S. (2001). Assessing the development of communication skills in undergraduate medical students. Med Educ, 35, 225–231.
Jaccard, J., Blanton, H., & Dodge, T. (2005). Peer influences on risk behavior: An analysis of the effects of a close friend. Dev Psychol, 41, 135–147.
Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., & Richardson, J. (2011). Positioning the booty-call relationship on the spectrum of relationships: Sexual but more emotional than one-night stands. Journal of Sex Research, 48, 486–495.
Kim, C. R., & Free, C. (2008). Recent evaluations of the peer-led approach in adolescent sexual health education: A systematic review. Perspect Sex Reprod Health, 40, 144–151.
Kirby, D., & Lepore, G. (2007). Sexual risk and protective factors: Factors affecting teen sexual behavior, pregnancy, childbearing and sexually transmitted disease: Which are important? Which can you change? Retrieved from ETR Associates: http://recapp.etr.org/recapp/documents/theories/RiskProtectiveFactors200712.pdf
Kotchick, B. A., Shaffer, A., Forehand, R., & Miller, K. S. (2001). Adolescent sexual risk behavior: A multi-system perspective. Clinical Psychological Review, 21, 493–519.
Lefkowitz, E. S. (2005). “Things have gotten better”: Developmental changes among emerging adults after the transition to university. J Adolesc Res, 20, 40–63.
Lefkowitz, E. S., Boone, T. L., & Shearer, C. L. (2004). Communication with best friends about sex-related topics during emerging adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33, 339–351.
Lefkowitz, E. S., & Espinosa-Hernández, G. (2007). Sex-related communication with mothers and close friends during the transition to university. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 17–27.
Lefkowitz, E. S., Shearer, C. L., Gillen, M. M., & Espinosa-Hernández, G. (2014). How gendered attitudes relate to women’s and men’s sexual behaviors and beliefs. Sexuality & Culture, 18, 833–846.
Manago, A. M., Ward, L. M., & Aldana, A. (2014). The sexual experience of Latino young adults in college and their perceptions of values about sex communicated by their parents and friends. Emerging Adulthood, 3, 14–23.
Mastro, S., & Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J. (2015). Let’s talk openly about sex: Sexual communication, self-esteem, and efficacy as correlates of sexual well-being. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12, 579–598.
Meier, A., & Allen, G. (2009). Romantic relationships from adolescence to young adulthood: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Sociol Q, 50, 308–335.
Mod, G. B. B. (2010). Reading romance: The impact Facebook rituals can have on a romantic relationship. Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology, 1, 61–77.
Moore, E. W., Smith, W. E., & Folsom, A. R. B. (2012). F.O.R.E.play: The utility of brief sexual health interventions among college students. American Journal of College Health, 60, 175–177.
Morgan, E. M., & Korobov, N. (2012). Interpersonal identity formation in conversations with close friends about dating relationships. J Adolesc, 35, 1471–1483.
Morgan, E. M., & Zurbriggen, E. L. (2012). Changes in sexual values and their sources over the 1st year of college. J Adolesc Res, 27, 471–497.
Mosher, W. D., Chandra, A., & Jones, J. (2005). Sexual behavior and selected health measures: Men and women 15–44 years of age, United States, 2002. CDC Advance Data from Vital and Health Statistics, 362, 1–56.
Noar, S. M., Carlyle, K., & Cole, C. (2006). Why communication is crucial: Meta-analysis of the relationship between safer sexual communication and condom use. J Health Commun, 11, 365–390.
Patrick, M. E., & Maggs, J. L. (2009). Does drinking lead to sex? Daily alcohol-sex behaviors and expectancies among college students. Psychol Addict Behav, 23, 472–481.
Paul, E. L., & Hayes, K. A. (2002). The casualties of ‘casual’ sex: A qualitative exploration of the phenomenology of college students' hookups. J Soc Pers Relat, 19, 639–661.
Potard, C., Courtois, R., & Rusch, E. (2008). The influence of peers on risky sexual behaviour during adolescence. European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 13, 264–270.
Powell, H. L., & Segrin, C. (2004). The effect of family and peer communication on college students’ communication with dating partners about HIV and AIDS. Health Commun, 16, 427–449.
Ragsdale, K., Bersamin, M. M., Schwartz, S. J., Zamboanga, B. L., Kerrick, M. R., & Grube, J. W. (2014). Development of sexual expectancies among adolescents: Contributions by parents, peers and the media. Journal of Sex Research, 51, 551–560.
Real, K., & Rimal, R. N. (2007). Friends talk to friends about drinking: Exploring the role of peer communication in the theory of normative social behavior. Health Commun, 22, 169–180.
Rittenour, C. E., & Booth-Butterfield, M. (2006). College students’ sexual health: Investigating the role of peer communication. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 7, 57–65.
Saavedra, A. R., & Saavedra, J. E. (2011). Do colleges cultivate critical thinking, problem solving, writing, and interpersonal skills? Econ Educ Rev, 30, 1516–1526.
Schwartz, S. J., Zamboanga, B. L., Luyckx, K., Meca, A., & Ritchie, R. A. (2013). Identity in emerging adulthood: Reviewing the field and looking forward. Emerging Adulthood, 1, 96–113.
Sieving, R. E., Eisenberg, M. E., Pettingell, S., & Skay, C. (2006). Friends’ influence on adolescents’ first sexual intercourse. Perspect Sex Reprod Health, 38, 13–19.
Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Tolman, D. L., & McClelland, S. I. (2011). Normative sexuality development in adolescence: A decade in review, 2000–2009. J Res Adolesc, 21, 242–255.
Treboux, D., & Busch-Rossnagel, N. A. (1995). Age differences in parent and peer influences on female sexual behavior. J Res Adolesc, 5, 469–487.
Trinh, S. L., & Ward, L. M. (2015). The nature and impact of gendered patterns of peer sexual communications among heterosexual emerging adults. The Journal of Sex Research, 53, 298–308.
Trinh, S. L., Ward, L. M., Day, K., Thomas, K., & Levin, D. (2014). Contributions of divergent peer and parent sexual messages to Asian American college students’ sexual behaviors. Journal of Sex Research, 51, 37–41.
Widman, L., Choukas-Bradley, S., Helms, S. W., Golin, C. E., & Prinstein, M. J. (2014). Sexual communication between early adolescents and their dating partners, parents, and best friends. Journal of Sex Research, 51, 731–741.
Widman, L., Welsh, D. P., McNulty, J. K., & Little, K. C. (2006). Sexual communication and contraceptive use in adolescent dating couples. J Adolesc Health, 39, 893–899.
Funding
This work was supported by grant #R01 HD 41720 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development to Jennifer L. Maggs and by grants #T32 DA017629 and #P50 DA039838 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse. The views expressed in this article are ours and do not reflect the funding agency.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Studies Involving Human Participants
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Waterman, E.A., Wesche, R. & Lefkowitz, E.S. Longitudinal Correlates of Peer Sexual Communication Quality in Late Adolescence. Sex Res Soc Policy 15, 421–432 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-017-0315-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-017-0315-8