Advertisement

Sexuality Research and Social Policy

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 421–432 | Cite as

Longitudinal Correlates of Peer Sexual Communication Quality in Late Adolescence

  • Emily A. Waterman
  • Rose Wesche
  • Eva S. Lefkowitz
Article

Abstract

Comfort discussing sex with friends may develop over time and may be associated with individual and peer characteristics. The current paper uses longitudinal data to examine the developmental trajectory and between- and within-person correlates of peer sexual communication quality. Participants were 434 college students (52.1% female, 38.7% European American/White, 32.5% African American/Black, 28.8% Latino American/Hispanic; M = 18.0 [SD = 0.4] years old fall of first year) who completed surveys at four semesters. Peer sexual communication quality improved across the college years, and tended to be higher during semesters when late adolescents held less conservative attitudes about sex and communicated about sex more frequently. Additionally, peer sexual communication quality was better among women and late adolescents who were sexually active at more semesters. We discuss implications for peer-led sexual health intervention programs and for theories of normative sexuality development.

Keywords

Peers Sexual communication Sexual attitudes Sexuality development Adolescence 

Notes

Funding

This work was supported by grant #R01 HD 41720 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development to Jennifer L. Maggs and by grants #T32 DA017629 and #P50 DA039838 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse. The views expressed in this article are ours and do not reflect the funding agency.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Studies Involving Human Participants

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development, volume six: Six theories of child development (pp. 1–60). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  2. Carpenter, L. M. (2001). The ambiguity of “having sex”: The subjective experience of virginity loss in the United States. Journal of Sex Research, 38, 127–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Byron, P. (2017). Friendship, sexual intimacy, and young people’s negotiations of sexual health. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 19, 486–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cupples, J. B., Zukoski, A. P., & Dierwechter, T. (2010). Reaching young men: Lessons learned in the recruitment, training, and utilization of male peer sexual health educators. Health Promot Pract, 11, 19S–25S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2011). The disaggregation of within-person and between-person effects in longitudinal models of change. Annu Rev Psychol, 62, 583–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davis, D., Shaver, P. R., Widman, K. F., Vernon, M. L., Follette, W. C., & Beitz, K. (2006). “I can’t get no satisfaction”: Insecure attachment, inhibited sexual communication, and sexual dissatisfaction. Pers Relat, 13, 465–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DiIorio, C., Dudley, W. N., Lehr, S., & Soet, J. E. (2000). Correlates of safer sex communication among college students. J Adv Nurs, 32, 658–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DiIorio, C., Kelley, M., & Hockenberry-Eaton, M. (1999). Communication about sexual issues: Mothers, fathers, and friends. J Adolesc Health, 24, 181–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elliott, S. (2010). Talking to teens about sex: Mothers negotiate resistance, discomfort, and ambivalence. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 7, 310–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. England, P., Shafer, E. F., & Fogarty, A. C. (2008). Hooking up and forming romantic relationships on today’s college campuses. The Gendered Society Reader, 3, 531–593.Google Scholar
  11. Feldman, S. S., & Rosenthal, D. A. (2000). The effect of communication characteristics on family members’ perceptions of parents as sex educators. J Res Adolesc, 10, 119–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Future of Sex Education Initiative. (2012). National sexuality education standards: Core content and skills, K-12 [a special publication of the Journal of School Health]. Retrieved from http://www.futureofsexed.org/documents/josh-fose-standards-web.pdf
  13. Frantz, J. M. (2015). A peer-led approach to promoting health education in schools: The views of peers. South African Journal of Education, 35, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gariépy, J. (1996). The question of continuity and change in development. In R. B. Cairns, G. H. Elder Jr., & E. J. Costello (Eds.), Developmental science (pp. 78–96). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 17.0 update (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
  16. Greene, K. (2009). An integrated model of health disclosure decision-making. In T. D. Afifi & W. A. Afifi (Eds.), Uncertainty and information regulation in interpersonal contexts: Theories and applications (pp. 226–253). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Guzmán, B. L., Schlehofer-Sutton, M. M., Villanueva, C. M., Stritto, M. E. D., Casad, B. J., & Feria, A. (2003). Let’s talk about sex: How comfortable discussions about sex impact teen sexual behavior. J Health Commun, 8, 583–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harper, G. W., Gannon, C., Watson, S. G., Catania, J. A., & Dolcini, M. M. (2004). The role of close friends in African American adolescents’ dating and sexual behavior. Journal of Sex Research, 41, 351–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Herbenick, D., Reece, M., Schick, V., Sanders, S. A., Dodge, B., & Fortenberry, J. D. (2010). Sexual behavior in the United States: Results from a probability sample of men and women ages 14–94. J Sex Med, 7, 255–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Holman, A., & Sillars, A. (2012). Talk about “hooking up”: The influence of college student social networks on nonrelationship sex. Health Commun, 27, 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Howard, A. L. (2015). Leveraging time-varying covariates to test within- and between-person effects and interactions in the multilevel linear model. Emerging Adulthood, 3, 400–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hudson, W. W., Murphy, G. J., & Nurius, P. S. (1983). A short-form scale to measure liberal vs. conservative orientations toward human sexual expression. Journal of Sex Research, 19, 258–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Humphris, G. M., & Kaney, S. (2001). Assessing the development of communication skills in undergraduate medical students. Med Educ, 35, 225–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jaccard, J., Blanton, H., & Dodge, T. (2005). Peer influences on risk behavior: An analysis of the effects of a close friend. Dev Psychol, 41, 135–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., & Richardson, J. (2011). Positioning the booty-call relationship on the spectrum of relationships: Sexual but more emotional than one-night stands. Journal of Sex Research, 48, 486–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kim, C. R., & Free, C. (2008). Recent evaluations of the peer-led approach in adolescent sexual health education: A systematic review. Perspect Sex Reprod Health, 40, 144–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kirby, D., & Lepore, G. (2007). Sexual risk and protective factors: Factors affecting teen sexual behavior, pregnancy, childbearing and sexually transmitted disease: Which are important? Which can you change? Retrieved from ETR Associates: http://recapp.etr.org/recapp/documents/theories/RiskProtectiveFactors200712.pdf
  28. Kotchick, B. A., Shaffer, A., Forehand, R., & Miller, K. S. (2001). Adolescent sexual risk behavior: A multi-system perspective. Clinical Psychological Review, 21, 493–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lefkowitz, E. S. (2005). “Things have gotten better”: Developmental changes among emerging adults after the transition to university. J Adolesc Res, 20, 40–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lefkowitz, E. S., Boone, T. L., & Shearer, C. L. (2004). Communication with best friends about sex-related topics during emerging adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33, 339–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lefkowitz, E. S., & Espinosa-Hernández, G. (2007). Sex-related communication with mothers and close friends during the transition to university. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lefkowitz, E. S., Shearer, C. L., Gillen, M. M., & Espinosa-Hernández, G. (2014). How gendered attitudes relate to women’s and men’s sexual behaviors and beliefs. Sexuality & Culture, 18, 833–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Manago, A. M., Ward, L. M., & Aldana, A. (2014). The sexual experience of Latino young adults in college and their perceptions of values about sex communicated by their parents and friends. Emerging Adulthood, 3, 14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mastro, S., & Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J. (2015). Let’s talk openly about sex: Sexual communication, self-esteem, and efficacy as correlates of sexual well-being. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12, 579–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Meier, A., & Allen, G. (2009). Romantic relationships from adolescence to young adulthood: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Sociol Q, 50, 308–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mod, G. B. B. (2010). Reading romance: The impact Facebook rituals can have on a romantic relationship. Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology, 1, 61–77.Google Scholar
  37. Moore, E. W., Smith, W. E., & Folsom, A. R. B. (2012). F.O.R.E.play: The utility of brief sexual health interventions among college students. American Journal of College Health, 60, 175–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Morgan, E. M., & Korobov, N. (2012). Interpersonal identity formation in conversations with close friends about dating relationships. J Adolesc, 35, 1471–1483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Morgan, E. M., & Zurbriggen, E. L. (2012). Changes in sexual values and their sources over the 1st year of college. J Adolesc Res, 27, 471–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mosher, W. D., Chandra, A., & Jones, J. (2005). Sexual behavior and selected health measures: Men and women 15–44 years of age, United States, 2002. CDC Advance Data from Vital and Health Statistics, 362, 1–56.Google Scholar
  41. Noar, S. M., Carlyle, K., & Cole, C. (2006). Why communication is crucial: Meta-analysis of the relationship between safer sexual communication and condom use. J Health Commun, 11, 365–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Patrick, M. E., & Maggs, J. L. (2009). Does drinking lead to sex? Daily alcohol-sex behaviors and expectancies among college students. Psychol Addict Behav, 23, 472–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Paul, E. L., & Hayes, K. A. (2002). The casualties of ‘casual’ sex: A qualitative exploration of the phenomenology of college students' hookups. J Soc Pers Relat, 19, 639–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Potard, C., Courtois, R., & Rusch, E. (2008). The influence of peers on risky sexual behaviour during adolescence. European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 13, 264–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Powell, H. L., & Segrin, C. (2004). The effect of family and peer communication on college students’ communication with dating partners about HIV and AIDS. Health Commun, 16, 427–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ragsdale, K., Bersamin, M. M., Schwartz, S. J., Zamboanga, B. L., Kerrick, M. R., & Grube, J. W. (2014). Development of sexual expectancies among adolescents: Contributions by parents, peers and the media. Journal of Sex Research, 51, 551–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Real, K., & Rimal, R. N. (2007). Friends talk to friends about drinking: Exploring the role of peer communication in the theory of normative social behavior. Health Commun, 22, 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rittenour, C. E., & Booth-Butterfield, M. (2006). College students’ sexual health: Investigating the role of peer communication. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 7, 57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Saavedra, A. R., & Saavedra, J. E. (2011). Do colleges cultivate critical thinking, problem solving, writing, and interpersonal skills? Econ Educ Rev, 30, 1516–1526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schwartz, S. J., Zamboanga, B. L., Luyckx, K., Meca, A., & Ritchie, R. A. (2013). Identity in emerging adulthood: Reviewing the field and looking forward. Emerging Adulthood, 1, 96–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sieving, R. E., Eisenberg, M. E., Pettingell, S., & Skay, C. (2006). Friends’ influence on adolescents’ first sexual intercourse. Perspect Sex Reprod Health, 38, 13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tolman, D. L., & McClelland, S. I. (2011). Normative sexuality development in adolescence: A decade in review, 2000–2009. J Res Adolesc, 21, 242–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Treboux, D., & Busch-Rossnagel, N. A. (1995). Age differences in parent and peer influences on female sexual behavior. J Res Adolesc, 5, 469–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Trinh, S. L., & Ward, L. M. (2015). The nature and impact of gendered patterns of peer sexual communications among heterosexual emerging adults. The Journal of Sex Research, 53, 298–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Trinh, S. L., Ward, L. M., Day, K., Thomas, K., & Levin, D. (2014). Contributions of divergent peer and parent sexual messages to Asian American college students’ sexual behaviors. Journal of Sex Research, 51, 37–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Widman, L., Choukas-Bradley, S., Helms, S. W., Golin, C. E., & Prinstein, M. J. (2014). Sexual communication between early adolescents and their dating partners, parents, and best friends. Journal of Sex Research, 51, 731–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Widman, L., Welsh, D. P., McNulty, J. K., & Little, K. C. (2006). Sexual communication and contraceptive use in adolescent dating couples. J Adolesc Health, 39, 893–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emily A. Waterman
    • 1
  • Rose Wesche
    • 2
  • Eva S. Lefkowitz
    • 3
  1. 1.Bennett Pierce Prevention Research CenterThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  2. 2.Center for AIDS Intervention Research, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesMedical College of WisconsinMilwaukeeUSA
  3. 3.Human Development & Family StudiesUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsUSA

Personalised recommendations