Advertisement

Sexuality Research and Social Policy

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 34–47 | Cite as

Media’s Influence on Perceptions of Trans Women

  • Haley E. Solomon
  • Beth Kurtz-CostesEmail author
Article

Abstract

Although media representations of trans women are becoming increasingly common, many trans women still face discrimination in their daily lives, in part due to prejudices and stereotypes that are perpetuated by media. In two studies, we investigated group differences in baseline transphobia linked to gender, sexual orientation, religiosity, and political ideology; we then measured whether different representations of trans women in media led to attitude change. After providing information about their baseline attitudes, participants were randomly assigned to positive, negative, or control film-viewing conditions, with a problematic condition (i.e., sympathetic portrayal of a trans woman by a cisgender male actor) added in study 2. In each condition, participants viewed two depictions of trans women from film or television shows. After watching the clips, participants’ attitudes toward trans individuals were re-assessed. Heterosexuals, Christians, conservatives, and men (study 2 only) showed greater transphobia at pretest than LGB individuals, atheists, liberals, and women, respectively. Attitudes of participants who viewed negative film depictions of trans women became more negative after viewing the clips. We discuss implications of these findings in relation to recent media interest in representing trans women.

Keywords

Transgender Transgender attitudes Media Media representation Intergroup contact Vicarious intergroup contact LGBT 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Study 1 was based on the senior honors thesis of Haley Solomon. This research was supported by a Summer Undergraduate Research Fellowship from the University of North Carolina (UNC) Office for Undergraduate Research, the Pine Tree Scholarship from the UNC Sexuality Studies Program, and the UNC David Bray Peele Memorial Research Award.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

“Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.”

References

  1. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading. Mass: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  2. Balzer, C., Hutta, J. S., Adrián, T.Hyndal, P., &Stryker, S. (2012). Transrespect versus transphobia worldwide: A comparative review of the human-rights situation of gender-variant/trans people. Transrespect Versus Transphobia Worldwide Publication Series, 6.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, R. (2006). Gay-themed television and the slumpy class: The affordable, multicultural politics of the gay nineties. Television & New Media, 7, 184–215. doi: 10.1177/15274764 03255830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bond, B. J., & Compton, B. L. (2015). Gay on-screen: The relationship between exposure to gay characters on television and heterosexual audiences’ endorsement of gay equality. J Broadcast Electron Media, 59(4), 717–732. doi: 10.1080/08838151.2015.1093485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chapman, R., Watkins, R., Zappia, T., Combs, S., & Shields, L. (2012). Second level hospital health professionals’ attitudes toward lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender parents seeking health care for their children. J Clin Nurs, 21, 880–887. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03938.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark, C. C. (1969, Spring). Television and social control: Some observations on the portrayals of ethnic minorities. Television Quarterly, 18–22.Google Scholar
  7. Dermody, N., Jones, M. K., & Cumming, S. R. (2013). The failure of imagined contact in reducing explicit and implicit out-group prejudice toward male homosexuals. Curr Psychol, 32, 261–274. doi: 10.1007/s12144-013-9182-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dorsen, C. (2012). An integrative review of nurse attitudes towards lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender patients. Can J Nurs Res, 44, 18–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Finlay, B., &Walther, C. S. (2003). The relation of religious affiliation, service attendance, and other factors to homophobic attitudes among university students. Review of Religious Research, 370–393. doi:  10.2307/3512216
  10. Gazzola, S. B., & Morrison, M. A. (2014). Cultural and personally endorsed stereotypes of transgender men and transgender women: Notable correspondence or disjunction? International Journal of Transgenderism, 15, 76–99. doi: 10.1080/15532739.2014.937041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gehi, P. S., & Arkles, G. (2007). Unraveling injustice: Race and class impact of Medicaid exclusions of transition-related health care for transgender people. Sexuality Research and Social Policy: Journal of NSRC, 4(4), 7–35. doi: 10.1525/srsp.2007.4.4.7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Green, M. C., Brock, T. C., & Kaufman, G. F. (2004). Understanding media enjoyment: The role of transportation into narrative worlds. Communication Theory, 14(4), 311–327. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00317.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harbaugh, E., & Lindsey, E. W. (2015). Attitudes toward homosexuality among young adults: Connections to gender role identity, gender-typed activities, and religiosity. J Homosex, 62(8), 1098–1125. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2015.1021635.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hill, D. B., & Willoughby, B. L. B. (2005). The development and validation of the genderism and transphobia scale. Sex Roles, 53(7/8), 531–544. doi: 10.1007/s11199-005-7140-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. House Bill 2:An act to provide for single-sex multiple…public accommodations, NC Assemb. B. 2 (2016), (NC. Stat. 2016).Google Scholar
  16. Human RightsCampaign.(2016). Anti-transgender legislation spreads nationwide, bills targeting transgender children surge. Retrieved from: http://www.hrc.org/resources/unprecedented-onslaught-of-state-legislation-targeting-transgender-american
  17. Human Rights Campaign & Trans People of Color Coalition. (2015). Addressing anti-transgender violence: Exploring realities, challenges and solutions for policymakers and community advocates. Retrieved from: http://hrc-assets.s3-website-us-east-1.amazonaws.com//files/assets/resources/HRC-AntiTransgenderViolence-0519.pdf
  18. Husnu, S., & Crisp, R. J. (2010). Imagined intergroup contact: A new technique for encouraging greater inter-ethnic contact in Cyprus. Peace and Conflict, 16, 97–108. doi: 10.1080/10781910903484776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Joyce, N., & Harwood, J. (2014). Improving intergroup attitudes through televised vicarious intergroup contact: Social cognitive processing of in-group and out-group information. Commun Res, 41(5), 627–643. doi: 10.1177/0093650212447944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kanazawa, S. (2002). Bowling with our imaginary friends. Evol Hum Behav, 23(3), 167–171. doi: 10.1016/S1090-5138(01)00098-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee, C., & Kwan, P. (2014). The trans panic defense: Masculinity, heteronormativity, and the murder of transgender women. The Hastings Law Journal, 66(1), 77–132. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2430390.Google Scholar
  22. Mazziotta, A., Mummendey, A., & Wright, S. C. (2011). Vicarious intergroup contact effects: Applyingsocial-cognitive theory to intergroup contact research. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(2), 255–274. doi: 10.1177/1368430210390533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Movement Advancement Project, National Center for Transgender Equality, & Transgender Law Center. (2015). Understanding issues facing transgender Americans. Retrieved from: http://www.lgbtmap.org/file/understanding-issues-facing-transgender-americans.pdf
  24. Nagoshi, J. L., Adams, K. A., Terrell, H. K., Hill, E. D., Brzuzy, S., & Nagoshi, C. T. (2008). Gender differences in correlates of homophobia and transphobia. Sex Roles, 59, 521–531. doi: 10.1007/s11199-008-9458-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Norton, A. T., & Herek, G. M. (2013). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward transgender people: Findings from a national probability sample of U.S. adults. Sex Roles, 68, 738–753. doi: 10.1007/s11199-011-0110-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pettigrew, T. F., Tropp, L. R., Wagner, U., & Christ, O. (2011). Recent advances in intergroup contact theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35, 271–280. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schiappa, E., Gregg, P. B., & Hewes, D. E. (2005). The parasocial contact hypothesis. Commun Monogr, 72(1), 92–115. doi: 10.1080/0363775052000342544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schiappa, E., Gregg, P. B., & Hewes, D. E. (2006). Can one TV show make a difference?: Will &grace and the parasocial contact hypothesis. J Homosex, 51(4), 15–37. doi: 10.1300/j082v51n04_02.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Scout, N. F. N. (2016). Transgender health and well-being: Gains and opportunities in policy and law. Am J Orthopsychiatry, 86(4), 378–383. doi: 10.1037/ort0000192.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Seelman, K. L. (2016). Transgender adults’ access to college bathrooms and housing and the relationship to suicidality. J Homosex. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2016.1157998.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Stotzer, R. L. (2009). Violence against transgender people: A review of United States data. Aggress Violent Behav, 14, 170–179. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2009.01.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annu Rev Psychol, 33, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Talusan, M. (2016). Unerased: Counting transgender lives. Mic. Retrieved from: https://mic.com/unerased
  34. Testa, R. J., Sciacca, L. M., Wang, F., Hendricks, M. L., Goldblum, P., Bradford, J., & Bongar, B. (2012). Effects of violence on transgender people. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 43(5), 452–459. doi: 10.1037/a0029604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tukachinsky, R., Mastro, D., & Yarchi, M. (2015). Documenting portrayals of race/ethnicity on primetime television over a 20-year span and their association with national-level racial/ethnic attitudes. J Soc Issues, 71(1), 17–38. doi: 10.1111/josi.12094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Walch, S. E., Ngamake, S. T., Francisco, J., Stitt, R. L., & Shingler, K. A. (2012). The attitudes toward transgendered individuals scale: Psychometric properties. Arch Sex Behav, 41(5), 1283–1291. doi: 10.1007/s10508-012-9995-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Walch, S. E., Sinkkanen, K. A., Swain, E. M., Francisco, J., Breaux, C. A., & Sjoberg, M. D. (2012). Using intergroup contact theory to reduce stigma against transgender individuals: Impact of a transgender speaker panel presentation. J Appl Soc Psychol, 42(10), 2583–2605. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00955.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Warriner, K., Nagoshi, C. T., & Nagoshi, J. L. (2013). Correlates of homophobia, transphobia, and internalized homophobia in gay or lesbian and heterosexual samples. J Homosex, 60(9), 1297–1314. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2013.806177.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Whitley Jr., B. E. (2009). Religiosity and attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: A meta-analysis. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 19(1), 21–38. doi: 10.1080/10508610802471104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Winter, S., Webster, B., & Cheung, P. K. E. (2008). Measuring Hong Kong undergraduate students’ attitudes towards transpeople. Sex Roles, 59(9–10), 670–683. doi: 10.1007/s11199-008-9462-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Willoughby, B. L. B., Hill, D. B., Gonzalez, C. A., Lacorazza, A., Macapagal, R. A., Barton, M. E., & Doty, N. D. (2010). Who hates gender outlaws? A multisite and multination evaluation of the genderism and transphobia scale. International Journal of Transgenderism, 12, 254–271. doi: 10.1080/15532739.2010.550821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. World Professional Association for Transgender Health, The. (2011). Standards of care for the health of transsexual, transgender, and gender nonconforming people, 7th Version. Retrieved from www.wpath.org
  43. Zillmann, D. (2002). Exemplification theory of media influence. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 19–41). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology and NeuroscienceUniversity of North CarolinaChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations