Advertisement

Sexuality Research and Social Policy

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 356–370 | Cite as

The Gentle Neoliberalism of Modern Anti-bullying Texts: Surveillance, Intervention, and Bystanders in Contemporary Bullying Discourse

  • Doug Meyer
Article

Abstract

The author argues for the concept of "gentle" neoliberalism to account for how discourse in anti-bullying texts has increasingly presented itself as gentle and kind, while simultaneously reinforcing systems of surveillance and control. Results, based on a grounded theory analysis of 22 anti-bullying books, reveal that the texts generally decoupled bullying from power relations based on sexuality, overlooking homophobia and heteronormativity and marginalizing the experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) youth. Further, findings demonstrate a shift over time in the texts from an explicitly harsh description of the bullies to a seemingly kinder emphasis on reporting and intervening on behalf of the individual being bullied. This shift to interventionist discourse potentially expands mechanisms of control and reinforces inequalities based on race and social class, as bystanders are increasingly held accountable and students are encouraged to report their peers to authority figures. In response to neoliberal anti-bullying discourse, the author argues for scholarship and policy solutions that undermine unequal power structures and yet also oppose surveillance strategies of monitoring, reporting, and intervening.

Keywords

Bullying Neoliberalism LGBT studies Lesbian Gay Queer Surveillance 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Human and animal rights and informed consent

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Abrahamson, M. (1983). Social research methods. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Ahmed, O., & Jindasurat, C. (2014). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and hiv-affected hate violence in 2013. National Coalition of Anti-Violence Programs, Retrieved 1 July 2015, from http://www.avp.org/storage/documents/2013_ncavp_hvreport_final.pdf.
  3. Alexander, M. (2010). The new Jim Crow: mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bansel, P., Davies, B., Lewis, C., & Linnell, S. (2009). Bullies, bullying and power in the contexts of schooling. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 30(1), 59–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bay-Cheng, L. Y. (2015). The agency line: a neoliberal metric for appraising young women’s sexuality. Sex Roles, 73(7), 279–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bettie, J. (2003). Women without class: girls, race, and identity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  7. Böhm, A. (2004). Theoretical coding: text analysis in grounded theory. In U. Flick, E. von Kardoff, & I. Steink (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research (pp. 270–275). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Brank, E. M., Hoetger, L. A., & Hazen, K. P. (2012). Bullying. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 8, 213–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Browne, S. (2015). Dark matters: on the surveillance of blackness. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Calhoun, C. (2013). Occupy Wall Street in perspective. The British Journal of Sociology, 64(1), 26–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Centeno, M. A., & Cohen, J. N. (2012). The arc of neoliberalism. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 317–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, J. W., & Brooks, R. A. (2014). Confronting school bullying: kids, culture, and the making of a social problem. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  14. Collier, K., van Beusekom, G., Bos, H., & Sandfort, T. (2013). Sexual orientation and gender identity/expression related peer victimization in adolescence: a systematic review of associated psychosocial and health outcomes. Journal of Sex Research, 50(3-4), 299–317.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Comaroff, J. (2011). The end of neoliberalism? What is left of the left. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 637(1), 141–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Davis, K., Randall, D., Ambrose, A., & Orand, M. (2015). “I was bullied too”: stories of bullying and coping in an online community. Information, Communication & Society, 18(4), 357–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Duménil, G., & Lévy, D. (2011). The crisis of neoliberalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Elliott, S. (2014). “Who’s to blame?” Constructing the responsible sexual agent in neoliberal sex education. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 11(3), 211–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Enns, P. K. (2014). The public’s increasing punitiveness and its influence on mass incarceration in the United States. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 857–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ferguson, A. A. (2001). Bad boys: public schools in the making of black masculinity. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  22. Ferguson, J. (2010). The uses of neoliberalism. Antipode, 41(s1), 166–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fields, J., Mamo, L., Gilbert, J., & Lesko, N. (2014). Beyond bullying. Contexts, 13(4), 80–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fine, M., Freudenberg, N., Payne, Y., Perkins, T., Smith, K., & Wanzer, K. (2003). “Anything can happen with police around”: urban youth evaluate strategies of surveillance in public places. Journal of Social Issues, 59(1), 141–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Foreman, V. (2015). Constructing the victim in the bullying narrative: how bullying discourses affirm rather than challenge discriminatory notions of gender and sexuality. Crime, Media, Culture, 11(2), 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Formby, E. (2013). Understanding and responding to homophobia and bullying: contrasting staff and young people’s views within community settings in England. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 10(4), 302–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Formby, E. (2015). Limitations of focusing on homophobic, biphobic and transphobic ‘bullying’ to understand and address LGBT young people’s experiences within and beyond school. Sex Education: Sexuality, Society and Learning, 15(6), 626–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  29. Galitz, T., & Robert, D. (2014). Governing bullying through the new public health model: a Foucaultian analysis of a school anti-bullying programme. Critical Public Health, 24(2), 182–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gerlinger, J., & Turner, S. F. (2015). California’s public safety realignment correctional policy based on stakes rather than risk. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 26(8), 805–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gershon, I. (2011). Neoliberal agency. Current Anthropology, 52(4), 537–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gill, R. (2008). Culture and subjectivity in neoliberal and postfeminist times. Subjectivity, 25(1), 432–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley: The Sociological Press.Google Scholar
  34. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1999). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  35. Green, M., Bobrowicz, A., & Ang, C. S. (2015). The lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community online: discussions of bullying and self-disclosure in YouTube videos. Behaviour & Information Technology, 34(7), 704–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Grzanka, P. R., & Mann, E. S. (2014). Queer youth suicide and the psychopolitics of “it gets better.” Sexualities, 17(4), 369–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Hilgers, M. (2013). Embodying neoliberalism: thoughts and responses to critics. Social Anthropology, 21(1), 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hirschfield, P., & Celinska, K. (2011). Beyond fear: sociological perspectives on the criminalization of school discipline. Sociology Compass, 5(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kaufman, L. (2013). Publishers revel in youthful cruelty (p. C1). New York: The New York Times.Google Scholar
  41. Kupchik, A., & Monahan, T. (2006). The new American school: preparation for post‐industrial discipline. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27(5), 617–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Marying, P. (2004). Qualitative content analysis. In U. Flick, E. von Kardoff, & I. Steink (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research (pp. 266–269). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  43. Meyer, D. (2014). Resisting hate crime discourse: queer and intersectional challenges to neoliberal hate crime laws. Critical Criminology, 22(1), 113–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Meyer, D. (2015). Violence against queer people: race, class, gender, and the persistence of anti-LGBT discrimination. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Miles, M., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Mirowski, P. (2013). Never let a serious crisis go to waste: how neoliberalism survived the financial meltdown. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  47. Ong, A. (2006). Neoliberalism as exception: mutations in citizenship and sovereignty. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Oppliger, P., & Davis, A. (2015). Portrayals of bullying: a content analysis of picture books for preschoolers. Early Childhood Education Journal. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s10643-015-0734-1.Google Scholar
  49. Paceley, M., & Flynn, K. (2012). Media representations of bullying toward queer youth: gender, race, and age discrepancies. Journal of LGBT Youth, 9(4), 340–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pascoe, C. J. (2007). Dude, you’re a fag: masculinity and sexuality in high school. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  51. Pascoe, C. J. (2013). Notes on a sociology of bullying: young men’s homophobia as gender socialization (pp. 87–104). QED: A Journal in GLBTQ Worldmaking, Inaugural Issue.Google Scholar
  52. Payne, E., & Smith, M. (2013). LGBTQ kids, school safety, and missing the big picture: how the dominant bullying discourse prevents school professionals from thinking about systemic marginalization or…why we need to rethink LGBTQ bullying (pp. 1–36). QED: A Journal in GLBTQ Worldmaking, Inaugural Issue.Google Scholar
  53. Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (2002). Neoliberalizing space. Antipode, 34(3), 380–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Peck, J., Theodore, N., & Brenner, N. (2010). Postneoliberalism and its malcontents. Antipode, 41(s1), 94–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Peck, J., Theodore, N., & Brenner, N. (2012). Neoliberalism resurgent? Market rule after the great recession. South Atlantic Quarterly, 111(2), 265–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pipher, M. (1994). Reviving ophelia: saving the selves of adolescent girls. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  57. Quinn, T., & Meiners, E. R. (2013). From anti-bullying laws and gay marriages to queer worlds and just futures (pp. 149–176). QED: A Journal in GLBTQ Worldmaking, Inaugural Issue.Google Scholar
  58. Ringrose, J. (2008). “Just be friends”: exposing the limits of educational bully discourses for understanding teen girls’ heterosexualized friendships and conflicts. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29(5), 509–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ringrose, J., & Renold, E. (2010). Normative cruelties and gender deviants: the performative effects of bully discourses for girls and boys in school. British Educational Research Journal, 36(4), 573–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  61. Smith, P., Kupferberg, A., Mora-Merchan, J., Samara, M., Bosley, S., & Osborn, R. (2012). A content analysis of school anti-bullying policies: a follow-up after six years. Educational Psychology in Practice, 28(1), 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Soss, J., Fording, R. C., & Schram, S. F. (2011). Disciplining the poor: neoliberal paternalism and the persistent power of race. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Spade, D. (2011). Normal life: administrative violence, critical trans politics and the limits of law. Brooklyn: South End Press.Google Scholar
  64. Taylor, E. (2013). Surveillance schools: security, discipline and control in contemporary education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Thornberg, R. (2011). “She’s weird!”—the social construction of bullying in school: a review of qualitative research. Children & Society, 25(4), 258–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wacquant, L. (2009). Prisons of poverty. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  67. Walton, G. (2005a). “Bullying widespread”: a critical analysis of research and public discourse on bullying. Journal of School Violence, 4(1), 91–118.Google Scholar
  68. Walton, G. (2005b). The notion of bullying through the lens of Foucault and critical theory. Journal of Educational Thought, 39(1), 55–73.Google Scholar
  69. Wayne, R. (2013). The social construction of childhood bullying through U.S. news media. Journal of Contemporary Anthropology, 4(1), Article 3. Available at: http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/jca/vol4/iss1/3.
  70. Weaver, L. M., Brown, J. R., Weddle, D. B., & Aalsma, M. C. (2013). A content analysis of protective factors within states’ antibullying laws. Journal of School Violence, 12(2), 156–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Weston, K. (2016). Animate planet: making visceral sense of living in a high-tech ecologically damaged world. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Women, Gender, & SexualityThe University of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations