Advertisement

Sexuality Research and Social Policy

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 142–157 | Cite as

Examining the Nuance in Public Opinion of Pro-LGB Policies in a “Red State”

  • Mathew StangeEmail author
  • Emily Kazyak
Article

Abstract

The red-blue state and urban–rural narratives—which depict that people living in red states and rural areas oppose pro-LGB policies—are popular frames for describing variation in public opinion of LGB policies by geographic region. In a test case of a red state, we examine public opinion of pro-LGB policies to assess the accuracy of the red–blue and urban–rural narratives. Using data from a survey of Nebraskans (n = 1608), we found that public opinion was more nuanced than the red state narrative allows but that urban and rural respondents reported significantly different opinions of pro-LGB policies. Rural people, however, were not unsupportive of all pro-LGB policies. Among all Nebraskans, support was higher for policies to protect LGB people from housing and job discrimination while support was lower for marriage and adoption rights. We discuss what these findings mean for public policy, urban and rural LGB individuals, and future public opinion studies of LGB issues.

Keywords

Lesbian Gay Bisexual Public Opinion Red state Urban Rural Nebraska 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This paper is based on Mathew Stange’s dissertation research in the Survey Research and Methodology (SRAM) Program at the University of Nebraska–Lincoln. The authors thank Dr. Jolene Smyth, Dr. Kristen Olson, and Dr. Christina Falci of the University of Nebraska–Lincoln for the feedback that improved this research and the Bureau of Sociological Research (BOSR) for the data collection.

References

  1. Abramowitz, A. I., & Saunders, K. L. (2008). Is polarization a myth? The Journal of Politics, 70(2), 542–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abrams, S, & Fiorina, MP (2012). “The Big Sort” that wasn’t: a skeptical reexamination. PS: Political Science & Politics, 45(2), 203–210.Google Scholar
  3. Adam, B. D. (2003). The Defense of Marriage Act and American exceptionalism: the “gay marriage” panic in the United States. Journal of the History of Sexuality, 12(2), 259–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. American Association for Public Opinion Research (2009). Standard definitions: final dispositions of case codes and outcomes for surveys. 6th edition. AAPOR. Retrieved from http://www.aapor.org.
  5. Andersen, R., & Fetner, T. (2008). Cohort differences in tolerance of homosexuality: attitudinal change in Canada and the U.S., 1981–2000. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 311–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Atkeson, L. R., Adams, A. N., & Alvarez, R. M. (2014). Nonresponse and mode effects in self- and interviewer-administered surveys. Political Analysis, 22(3), 304–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baunach, D. M. (2012). Changing same-sex marriage attitudes in America from 1988 through 2010. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(2), 364–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Becker, A. B. (2014). Employment discrimination, local school boards, and LGBT civil rights: reviewing 25 years of public opinion data. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 26(3), 342–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Becker, A., & Scheufele, D. (2011). New voters, new outlook? Predispositions, social networks, and the changing politics of gay civil rights. Social Science Quarterly, 92(2), 324–345.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bishin, B., & Smith, A. (2013). When do legislators defy popular sovereignty? Testing theories of minority representation using DOMA. Political Research Quarterly, 66(4), 794–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bishop, B. (2004). The big sort: why clustering of like-minded America is tearing us apart. New York: First Mariner Books.Google Scholar
  12. Bobo, L. D., & Charles, C. Z. (2009). Race in the American mind: from the Moynihan report to the Obama candidacy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 621(1), 243–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bostwick, W. B., Boyd, C. J., Hughes, T. L., & McCabe, S. E. (2010). Dimensions of sexual orientation and the prevalence of mood and anxiety disorders in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 468–475.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brewer, P. R., & Wilcox, C. (2005). Same-sex marriage and civil unions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69(4), 599–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brumbaugh, S. M., Sanchez, L. A., Nock, S. L., & Wright, J. D. (2008). Attitudes toward gay marriage in states undergoing marriage law transformation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 345–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Burdge, B. (2009). Legal discrimination against lesbian, gay, and bisexual employees: a multi-theoretical model to explain an elusive civil rights law. Journal of Policy Practice, 8, 4–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bureau of Sociological Research. (2013). NASIS 2012–2013 methodology report.Google Scholar
  18. Burnett, R. C., & Salka, W. M. (2009). Determinants of electoral support for anti-gay marriage: an examination of 2006 votes on ballot measures in the states. Journal of Homosexuality, 56(8), 1071–1082.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Carter, J. (2008). A cosmopolitan way of life for all? A reassessment of the impact of urban and region on racial attitudes from 1972 to 2006. Journal of Black Studies, 40(6), 1075–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Carter, J., & Borch, C. (2005). Assessing the effects of urbanism and regionalism on gender-role attitudes, 1974–1998. Sociological Inquiry, 75(4), 548–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Davis, M. A. (2013). Demographics of gay and lesbian adoption and family policies. In A. K. Baumle (Ed.), International handbook on the demography of sexuality (pp. 383–403). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dejka, J. (2014). Heineman seeks ed board applicants’ views on gay adoption, Obamacare, immigrant tuition. Omaha World-Herald. Retrieved from http://www.omaha.com.
  23. de Leeuw, E. D. (2008). Choosing the method of data collection. In E. D. de Leeuw, J. J. Hox, & D. A. Dillman (Eds.), International handbook of survey methodology (pp. 113–135). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  24. Dimock, M., Doherty, C., & Kiley, J. (2013). Growing support for gay marriage: changed minds and changing demographics. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
  25. Drumheller, K., & McQuay, B. (2010). Living in the buckle: promoting LGBT outreach services in conservative urban/rural centers. Communication Studies, 61(1), 70–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Eldridge, V. L., Mack, L., & Swank, E. (2006). Explaining comfort with homosexuality in rural America. Journal of Homosexuality, 51(2), 39–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. England, P. (2010). The gender revolution uneven and stalled. Gender & Society, 24, 149–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fischer, C. S. (1975). Toward a subcultural theory of urbanism. American Journal of Sociology, 80(6), 1319–1341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fiorina, M. P., Abrams, S. A., & Pope, J. C. (2008). Polarization in the American public: misconceptions and misreadings. The Journal of Politics, 70(2), 556–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fiorina, M. P., Abrams, S. J., & Pope, J. C. (2006). Culture war? The myth of a polarized America. New York: Pearson-Longman.Google Scholar
  31. Flores, AR, & Barclay, S (2015). Trends in public support for marriage for same-sex couples by state. The Williams Institute. Retrieved from http://www.williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu.
  32. Freedom to Marry (n.d.). States. Available online at <http://www.freedomtomarry.org/states>. Accessed September 1, 2015.
  33. Friedman, S, Reynolds, A, Scovill, S, Brassier, FR, Campbell, R, & Ballou, M (2013). An estimate of housing discrimination against same-sex couples. Office of Policy Development and Research. US Department of Housing and Urban Development. Retrieved from http://www.huduser.gov/portal/Publications/pdf/Hsg_Disc_against_SameSexCpls_v3.pdf.
  34. Funk, J (2013, December 31). Most Nebraska schools to offer same-sex benefits. Associated PressGoogle Scholar
  35. Gates, G. J. (2013). Geography of the LGBT population. In A. K. Baumle (Ed.), International handbook on the demography of sexuality (pp. 229–242). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gates, G. J., & Newport, F. (2013). LGBT percentage highest in DC, lowest in North Dakota. North Dakota: Gallup.Google Scholar
  37. Gebelhoff, R, & Leonhardt, D (2014, August 23). The growing blue-state diaspora. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com
  38. Ghaziani, A. (2014). Measuring urban sexual cultures. Theoretical Sociology, 43, 371–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Glissmann, B. (2013, December 22). Starting in 2014, some Nebraska hospitals will cover same-sex couples. Omaha World Herald. Retrieved from http://www.omaha.com.
  40. Goldberg, A. E., & Allen, K. R. (2013). Donor, dad, or…? Young adults with lesbian parents’ experiences with known donors. Family Process, 52, 338–350.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Grace, E. (2012, October 4). World-Herald Poll: majority now back recognition of gay unions. Omaha World-Herald. Retrieved from http://www.omaha.com.
  42. Haider-Markel, D. P., & Joslyn, M. R. (2008). Attributions and the regulation of marriage: considering the parallels between race and homosexuality. Political Science Politics, 38, 233–239.Google Scholar
  43. Hatzenbuehler, M. L., Bellatorre, A., Lee, Y., Finch, B. K., Muennig, P., & Fiscella, K. (2014). Structural stigma and all-cause mortality in sexual minority populations. Social Science & Medicine, 103, 33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hatzenbuehler, M. L. (2010). Social factors as determinants of mental health disparities in LGBT populations: implications for public policy. Social Issues and Policy Review, 4, 31–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Herek, G. M. (2009). Sexual stigma and sexual prejudice in the United States: a conceptual framework. In D. A. Hope (Ed.), Contemporary perspectives on lesbian, gay, and bisexual identities: the 54th Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 65–111). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hicks, N. (2013). No vote in sight for Lincoln’s fairness ordinance. Lincoln: Lincoln Journal Star.Google Scholar
  47. Hopkins, J. J., Sorensen, A., & Taylor, V. (2013). Same-sex couples, families, and marriage: embracing and resisting heteronormativity. Sociology Compass, 7(2), 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hunter, J. D. (1991). Culture wars: the struggle to define America. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  49. Kazyak, E. (2011). Disrupting cultural selves: constructing gay and lesbian identities in rural locales. Qualitative Sociology, 34(4), 561–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kazyak, E. (2012). Midwest or lesbian? Gender, rurality, and sexuality. Gender & Society, 26(6), 825–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kazyak, E. (2015). “The Law’s the Law, Right?” Sexual minority mothers navigating legal inequities and inconsistencies. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 12, 188–201.Google Scholar
  52. Kiley, J. (2014). 61% of young Republicans favor same-sex marriage. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org
  53. Klinkner, P. (2004). Red and blue scare: the continuing diversity of the American electoral landscape. The Forum: A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics, 2(2), Article 2.Google Scholar
  54. Lax, J. R., & Phillips, J. H. (2009). Gay rights in the states: public opinion and policy responsiveness. American Political Science Review, 103(3), 367–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Levendusky, M. S., & Pope, J. C. (2011). Red states vs. blue states: going beyond the mean. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(2), 227–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lewis, G. B., & Gossett, C. W. (2008). Changing public opinion on same-sex marriage: the case of California. Politics & Policy, 36, 4–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lewis, G. B. (2005). Black-white differences in attitudes toward homosexuality and gay rights. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67, 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lewis, G. B. (2011). The friends and family plan: contact with gays and support for gay rights. The Policy Studies Journal, 39(2), 217–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lewis, G. B., & Rogers, M. A. (1999). Does the public support equal employment rights for gays and lesbians? In E. Riggle & B. Tadlock (Eds.), Gays and lesbians in the democratic process: public policy, public opinion, and political representation (pp. 118–145).Google Scholar
  60. Lewis, G. B., Rogers, M. A., & Sherrill, K. (2011). Lesbian, gay, and bisexual votes in the 2000 U.S. Presidential Election. Politics & Public Policy, 39(5), 655–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lipka, M. (2014). Gay marriage arrives in the South, where the public is less enthused. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org.
  62. Maher, J. (2015). Welcome to my homophobic state. Retrieved from: http://gawker.com/welcome-to-my-homophobic-state-1696050912.Google Scholar
  63. Martin, B. (2014). Sponsor of workplace sexual orientation bill encouraged. Nebraska Radio Network Retrieved from http://www.nebraskaradionetwork.com.
  64. McCarthy, J. (2014). Same-sex marriage support reaches new high at 55%. Gallup. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com.
  65. Meyer, I. H. (1995). Minority stress and mental health in gay men. Journal of Health & Social Behavior, 36, 38–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 674–697.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Moore, M. R., & Stambolis-Ruhstorfer, M. (2013). LGBT sexuality and families at the start of the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Sociology, 39, 491–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Morrison, MA, Morrison, TG, & Franklin, R. (2009). Modern and old-fashioned homonegativity among samples of Canadian and American university students. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40(4), 523–542.Google Scholar
  69. O’Connor, M. (2013, April 9). Polls show shift on same-sex marriage, but local foes don’t lose heart. Omaha World-Herald. Retrieved from http://www.omaha.com.
  70. Olson, L. R., Cadge, W., & Harrison, J. T. (2006). Religion and public opinion about same-sex marriage. Social Science Quarterly, 87(2), 340–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Oswald, R. F., & Lazarevic, V. (2011). “You live where?!” Lesbian mothers’ attachment to nonmetropolitan communities. Family Relations, 60(4), 373–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Patterson, R. G., & Riskind, C. J. (2010). Parenting intentions and desires among childless lesbian, gay, and heterosexual individuals. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(1), 78–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Pearl, M., & Galupo, M. P. (2007). Development and validation of the attitudes toward same-sex marriage scale. Journal of Homosexuality, 53(3), 117–134.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Pew Research Center (2013a). Growing support for gay marriage: changed minds and changing demographics. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org.
  75. Pew Research. (2013b). In gay marriage debate, both supporters and opponents see legal recognition as ‘inevitable.’. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org.
  76. Pew Research. (2014a). Changing attitudes on gay marriage. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org.
  77. Pew Research. (2014b). Political polarization in the American public: how increasing ideological uniformity and partisan antipathy affect politics, compromise, and everyday life. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org.
  78. Pizer, J. C., Sears, B., Mallory, C., & Hunter, N. D. (2012). Evidence of persistent and pervasive workplace discrimination against LGBT people: the need for Federal legislation prohibiting discrimination and providing for equal employment benefits. Loyola Law School Review, 45, 715–779.Google Scholar
  79. Pluhacek, Z. (2015). Nebraska bill to add LGBT workplace protections tabled for year. Lincoln: Lincoln Journal Star.Google Scholar
  80. Powell, B., Bolzendahl, C., Geist, C., & Steelman, L. C. (2010). Counted out: same-sex relations and Americans’ definitions of marriage. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  81. Raeburn, N. C. (2004). Working it out: the emergence and diffusion of the workplace movement for lesbian, gay, and bisexual rights. In D. J. Myers & D. M. Cress (Eds.), Authority in contention (pp. 187–230). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Rasmussen, C. E. (2006). We’re no metrosexuals: identity, place, and sexuality in the struggle over gay marriage. Social & Cultural Geography, 7(5), 807–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Rauch, J. (2014, June 15). Red America’s anti-gay backlash. The Daily Beast. Retrieved from http://www.thedailybeast.com
  84. Reed, L. (2012, June 9) NU to insure domestic partners. Omaha World Herald. Retrieved from http://www.omaha.com
  85. Reuters. (2012). Omaha narrowly approves law to protect gays from discriminationGoogle Scholar
  86. Rowatt, W. C., LaBouff, J., Johnson, M., Froese, P., & Tsang, J. (2009). Associations among religiousness, social attitudes, and prejudice in a national random sample of American adults. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 1, 14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Saad, L. (2013). In the US, blue states outnumber red states, 20 to 12. Gallup. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com
  88. Salka, W. M., & Burnett, R. C. (2011). Determinants of electoral support for anti-gay marriage constitutional amendments: an examination of ballot issues in California and Florida. Sexuality & Culture, 16(1), 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Schwartz, J. (2010). Investigating differences in public support for gay rights issues. Journal of Homosexuality, 57, 748–759.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Seidman, S. (2002). Beyond the closet: the transformation of gay and lesbian life. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  91. Shapiro, J. (2013). The law governing LGBT-parent families. In A. E. Goldberg & K. R. Allen (Eds.), LGBT-parent families (pp. 291–307). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Sherkat, D. E., de Vries, K. M., & Creek, S. (2010). Race, religion, and opposition to same-sex marriage. Social Science Quarterly, 91, 80–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Silver, N. (2013, March 26). How opinion on same-sex marriage is changing, and what it means. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com.
  94. Snively, C. A., Kreuger, L., Stretch, J. J., Wilson Watt, J., & Chadha, J. (2004). Understanding homophobia: preparing for practice realities in urban and rural settings. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 17(1), 59–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Spring, A. (2013). Declining segregation of same-sex partners: evidence from the census 2000 and 2010. Population Research and Policy Review, 32(5), 687–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Stange, M. (2014). Tailoring general population surveys to address participation and measurement challenges of surveying lesbian, gay, and bisexual people. Doctoral dissertation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska.Google Scholar
  97. Stoddard, M. (2014). Nebraska legislature: pressure will be on in short session. Omaha: Omaha World Herald.Google Scholar
  98. Stone, AL. (2012). Gay rights at the ballot box. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota PressGoogle Scholar
  99. Swank, E., Fahs, B., & Frost, D. M. (2013a). Region, social identities, and disclosure practices as predictors of heterosexist discrimination against sexual minorities in the United States. Sociological Inquiry, 83(2), 238–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Swank, E., Frost, D., & Fahs, B. (2012). Rural location and exposure to minority stress among sexual minorities in the United States. Psychology & Sexuality, 3(3), 226–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Swank, E., Woodford, M. R., & Lim, C. (2013b). Antecedents of pro-LGBT advocacy among sexual minority and heterosexual college students. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 10, 317–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Tuch, S. A. (1987). Urbanism, region, and tolerance revisited: the case of racial prejudice. American Sociological Review, 52(4), 504–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Walls, N. E. (2008). Toward a multidimensional understanding of heterosexism: the changing nature of prejudice. Journal of homosexuality, 55(1), 20–70. (4), 523–542.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Walsh, K. C. (2012). Putting inequality in its place: rural consciousness and the power of perspective. American Political Science Review, 106(3), 517–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Weinberg, J. D., Freese, J., & McElhattan, D. (2014). Comparing data characteristics and results of an online factorial survey between a population-based and a crowd source-recruited sample. Sociological Science, 1, 292–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Whitehead, A. L. (2010). Sacred rites and civil rights: religion’s effect on attitudes toward same-sex unions and the perceived cause of homosexuality. Social Science Quarterly, 91, 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Wienke, C., & Hill, G. J. (2013). Does place of residence matter? Rural-urban differences and the wellbeing of gay men and lesbians. Journal of Homosexuality, 60, 1256–1279.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Wilson, T. C. (1985). Urbanism and tolerance: a test of some hypotheses drawn from Wirth and Stouffer. American Sociological Review, 50(1), 117–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Wirth, L. (1938). Urbanism as a way of life. American Journal of Sociology, 44(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Woodford, M. R., Chonody, J., Scherrer, K., Silverschanz, P., & Kulick, A. (2012). The “persuadable middle” on same-sex marriage: formative research to build support among heterosexual college students. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 9(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mathematica Policy ResearchAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.University of Nebraska–LincolnLincolnUSA

Personalised recommendations