Advertisement

Sexuality Research and Social Policy

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 317–322 | Cite as

Ethical and Legal Considerations for Crafting Rigorous Online Sex Trafficking Research Methodology

  • Jesse BachEmail author
  • Jennifer Dohy
Article

Abstract

The literature involving human trafficking is limited and often involves advocacy groups, victim shelters, and gatekeepers. As a result, an inaccurate representation of human trafficking may occur. To increase the existing literature base, many investigators are crafting methodology that involves examining Internet-based commercial sex advertisements. Such investigation involves the undetermined ontological status of the Internet and raises the question of whether such postings are representative of written, publicly available text or if they are representative of human participants. This paper postulates that the increased risk of examining Internet-based commercial sex advertisements may dissuade scholars from interpreting the Internet as a textual repository. This could be the result of mandatory reporting of suspected child abuse as required by state law and the required reporting of felonious behavior as required by federal law. The authors advocate for the adoption of a human subjects approach to Internet-based sex trafficking research as it reduces the potential for inadvertent harm to parties, but to also request a waiver of informed consent as is outlined in §46.116 and §46.408 (c) of Part 46, Protection of Human Subjects.

Keywords

Human trafficking Sex trafficking Mandatory reporting Methodology IRB 

References

  1. Bach, J. & Dalton, R. (2011). The Cleveland Backpage Report. The Imagine Foundation & Operation Broken Silence retrieved from: imaginefreedom.org/wp-content/uploads/…/backpage_report.pdf
  2. Bales, K. (2004). Disposable people, new slavery in the global economy. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bales, K. (2007). Ending slavery: how we free today’s slaves. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bassett, E. H., & O’Riordan, K. (2002). Ethics of Internet research: contesting the human subjects research model.Google Scholar
  5. Berry, D. (2004). Internet research: privacy, ethics and alienation: an open source approach. Internet Research, 14(4), 323–332. doi: 10.1108/10662240410555333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brunovskis, A., & Surtees. R. (2010). Untold stories: biases and selection effects in research with victims of trafficking for sexual exploitation. International Migration, 48. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2435.2010.00628.x.
  7. Capurro, R., & Pingel, C. (2002). Ethical issues of online communication research. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(3), 189–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cavasos, E., & Morin, G. (1994). Cyperspace and the law: your rights and duties in the online world. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dank, M., Khan, B., Downey, P.M., Kotonias, C., Mayer, D., Owens, C., Pacifici, L., Yu, L. (2014). Estimating the size and structure of the underground commercial sex economy in eight major US cities. The Urban Institute. Google Scholar
  10. Fedina, L. (2014). Use and misuse of research in books on sex trafficking: implications for interdisciplinary researchers, practitioners, and advocates. Trauma Violence Abuse. doi: 10.1177/1524838014523337.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hudson, J., & Buckman, A. (2004). “Go away”: participant objections to being studied and the ethics of chatroom research. The Information Society, 20, 127–139. doi: 10.1080/01972240490423030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. King, S. (1996). Researching internet communities: proposed ethical guidelines for the reporting of results. The Information Society, 12(2), 119–128. doi: 10.1080/713856145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Latonero, M. (2011). Human trafficking online; the role of social networking sites and online classifieds. University of Southern California.Google Scholar
  14. Schrag, B. (2008). Commentary on conducting research in online communities. Teaching Ethics, 8(2), 125–134. doi: 10.5840/tej2008829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Skinner, E. B. (2008). A crime so monstrous; face-to-face with modern-day slavery. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  16. Tyldum, G. (2010). Limitations in research on human trafficking. International Migration, 48(5), 1–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2435.2009.00597.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. (2009). Code of Federal Regulations. Title 45, public welfare, Department of Health and Human Services Part 46, Protection of Human Subjects. Retrieved from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.html/.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cleveland State UniversityClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations