Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Engaging Youth Perspectives on Sexual Rights and Gender Equality in Intimate Relationships as a Foundation for Rights-Based Sexuality Education

  • Published:
Sexuality Research and Social Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent efforts to promote a rights-based approach to sexuality education have emphasized the integration of human rights and gender equality principles into health promotion messages, with the goal of empowering youth regarding their sexual health and rights. When operationalizing this model into practice, it is critical that program developers and researchers engage youth in dialogue about the nature and meaning of these inherently complex constructs to enhance program relevance and effectiveness. In this study, we explored perspectives on sexual rights and gender equality in adolescent sexual relationships through eight focus groups with youth (N = 51) in low-income, predominantly Hispanic and African-American communities in Los Angeles, CA, as part of the development of a rights-based sexuality education initiative. Although youth were familiar with human rights in the context of social justice movements, many questioned the application of human rights to their own relationships. Youth articulated a number of potential challenges of the rights framework for adolescent relationships, addressing issues of relationship friction, rule-breaking, gender roles, and types of relationships. This article explores these themes and offers recommendations for the development of rights-based sexuality education programs and policy that are guided by the voices, interests, needs, and concerns of young people.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Advocates for Youth. (N.d.). The vision: Rights. respect. responsibility. Retrieved from http://www.advocatesforyouth.org/the-3rs. Accessed 14 Feb 2014

  • Aggleton, P., & Parker, R. (2010). Introduction. In P. Aggleton & R. Parker (Eds.), Routledge handbook of sexuality, health and rights (pp. 1–8). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ATLAS.ti (2010). ATLAS.ti (Verson 5.7.1) [Computer software]. Berlin: ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH.

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2004). Sexual economics: Sex as a female resource for social exchange in heterosexual interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 339–363. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bay-Cheng, L. (2003). The trouble of teen sex: The construction of adolescent sexuality through school-based sexuality education. Sex Education, 3(1), 61–74. doi:10.1080/1468181032000052162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berglas, N. F., Constantine, N. A., & Ozer, E. J. (2014). A rights-based approach to sexuality education: Conceptualization, clarification, and challenges. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. in press.

  • Bernard, H. R., & Ryan, G. W. (2010). Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berne, L., & Huberman, B. (1999). European approaches to adolescent sexual behavior. Washington, DC: Advocates for Youth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkoway, B., & Richards-Schuster, K. (2003). Youth participation in community evaluation research. American Journal of Evaluation, 24(1), 21–33. doi:10.1177/109821400302400103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, W. A., Welsh, D. P., & Furman, W. (2009). Adolescent romantic relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 631–652. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163459.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crepaz, N., Marshall, K. J., Aupont, L. W., Jacobs, E. D., Mizuno, Y., Kay, L. S., et al. (2009). The efficacy of HIV/STI behavioral interventions for African American females in the United States: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 99, 2069–2078. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2008.139519.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DiClemente, R. J., Wingood, G. M., Harrington, K. F., Lang, D. L., Davies, S. L., Hook, E. W., III, et al. (2004). Efficacy of an HIV prevention intervention for African American adolescent girls: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 292, 171–179. doi:10.1001/jama.292.2.171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DiClemente, R. J., Wingood, G. M., Rose, E. S., Sales, J. M., Lang, D. L., Caliendo, A. M., et al. (2009). Efficacy of sexually transmitted diseases/human immunodeficiency virus sexual risk-reduction intervention for African American adolescent females seeking sexual health services: A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, 163, 1112–1121. doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimmitt Champion, J., & Collins, J. L. (2013). Conceptualization of sexual partner relationship steadiness among ethnic minority adolescent women: Implications for evidence-based behavioral sexual risk reduction interventions. Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care, 24(3), 242–255. doi:10.1016/j.jana.2012.06.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon-Mueller, R., Germain, A., Fredrick, B., & Bourne, K. (2009). Towards a sexual ethics of rights and responsibilities. Reproductive Health Matters, 17, 111–119. doi:10.1016/S0968-8080(09)33435-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, A. A., & Rose, S. (2011). Has dating become more egalitarian? A 35 year review using Sex Roles. Sex Roles, 64, 843–862. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9957-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, M., & McClelland, S. I. (2006). Sexuality education and desire: Still missing after all these years. Harvard Educational Review, 76(3), 297–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfarb, E. S., & Constantine, N. A. (2011). Sexuality education. In B. B. Brown & M. Prinstein (Eds.), Encyclopedia of adolescence (Vol. 2, pp. 322–331). San Diego: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • International Planned Parenthood Federation. (2010). IPPF framework for comprehensive sexuality education (CSE). Retrieved from http://ippf.org/resources/publications/ippf-framework-comprehensive-sexuality-education.

  • International Planned Parenthood Federation. (2011). Exclaim! Young people’s guide to sexual rights: An IPPF declaration. Retrieved from http://www.ippf.org/sites/default/files/ippf_exclaim_lores.pdf.

  • International Sexuality and HIV Curriculum Working Group. (2009). It’s All One curriculum: Guidelines and activities for a unified approach to sexuality, gender, HIV, and human rights education. New York: Population Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewkes, R., Nduna, M., Levin, J., Jama, N., Dunkle, K., Puren, A., et al. (2008). Impact of Stepping Stones on incidence of HIV and HSV-2 and sexual behaviour in rural South Africa: Cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ [British Medical Journal], 337, a506. doi:10.1136/bmj.a506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kossen, J. (2012). Rights, respect, responsibility: Advancing the sexual and reproductive health and rights of young people through international human rights law. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change, 15, 143–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lottes, I. L. (2013). Sexual rights: Meanings, controversies, and sexual health promotion. Journal of Sex Research, 50(3–4), 367–391.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marques, M., & Ressa, N. (2013). The Sexuality Education Initiative: A programme involving teenagers, schools, parents and sexual health services in Los Angeles, CA, USA. Reproductive Health Matters, 21(41), 124–135. doi:10.1016/S0968-8080(13)41702-0.

  • Maxwell, J. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. M., & Schleifer, R. A. (2008). Through the looking glass: Abstinence-only-until-marriage programs and their impact on adolescent human rights. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 5(3), 28–43. doi:10.1525/srsp.2008.5.3.28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minkler, M., & Wallerstein, N. (2008). Community-based participatory research for health: From process to outcomes (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozer, E. J., Ritterman, M. L., & Wannis, M. G. (2010). Participatory action research (PAR) in middle school: Opportunities, constraints, and key processes. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46(1–2), 152–166. doi:10.1007/s10464-010-9335-8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pulerwitz, J., & Barker, G. (2008). Measuring attitudes toward gender norms among young men in Brazil: Development and psychometric evaluation of the GEM scale. Men and Masculinities, 10, 322–338. doi:10.1177/1097184X06298778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulerwitz, J., Michaelis, A., Verma, R., & Weiss, E. (2010). Addressing gender dynamics and engaging men in HIV programs: Lessons learned from Horizons research. Public Health Reports, 125, 282–292.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rogow, D., Haberland, N., Del Valle, A., Lee, N., Osakue, G., Sa, Z., et al. (2013). Integrating gender and rights into sexuality education: Field reports on using It’s All One. Reproductive Health Matters, 21(41), 154–156. doi:10.1016/S0968-8080(13)41699-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soleimanpour, S., Brindis, C., Geierstanger, S., Kandawalla, S., & Kurlaender, T. (2008). Incorporating youth-led community participatory research into school health center programs and policies. Public Health Reports, 123(6), 709–716.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, D. L. (2012). Female adolescents, sexual empowerment, and desire: A missing discourse of gender inequity. Sex Roles, 66(11–12), 746–757. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0122-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, & McClelland. (2011). Normative sexuality development in adolescence: A decade in review, 2000–2009. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 242–255. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00726.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U. N. Econ. & Soc. Council, Comm. on Population and Dev. (2012) Report on the Forty-Fifth Session, U. N. Doc. E/2012/25, E/CN.9/2012/8 (April 15 and 23–27).

  • United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2009). International technical guidance on sexuality education: An evidence-informed approach for schools, teachers and health educators. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001832/183281e.pdf.

  • Wingood, G. M., & DiClemente, R. J. (2000). Application of the theory of gender and power to examine HIV-related exposures, risk factors, and effective interventions for women. Health Education & Behavior, 27(5), 539–565. doi:10.1177/109019810002700502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wingood, G. M., DiClemente, R. J., Mikhail, I., Lang, D. L., McCree, D. H., Davies, S. L., Saag, M. (2004). A randomized controlled trial to reduce HIV transmission risk behaviors and sexually transmitted diseases among women living with HIV: The WiLLOW Program. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 37(Suppl. 2), 38–67. Retrieved from http://journals.lww.com/jaids/Fulltext/2004/10012/A_Randomized_Controlled_Trial_to_Reduce_HIV.2.aspx.

  • World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe & BZgA. (2010). Standards for sexuality education in Europe: A framework for policy makers, educational and health authorities and specialists. Cologne: Federal Centre for Health Education, BZgA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study employed data from a larger evaluation study funded by Planned Parenthood Los Angeles through a contract to the Public Health Institute, Oakland, CA. The analyses reported here were supported by grants from the Ford Foundation and the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. The authors thank Jessica Lin for research assistance, and Planned Parenthood Los Angeles education staff for co-facilitating focus groups.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nancy F. Berglas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berglas, N.F., Angulo-Olaiz, F., Jerman, P. et al. Engaging Youth Perspectives on Sexual Rights and Gender Equality in Intimate Relationships as a Foundation for Rights-Based Sexuality Education. Sex Res Soc Policy 11, 288–298 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-014-0148-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-014-0148-7

Keywords

Navigation