Sexuality Research and Social Policy

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 327–336 | Cite as

Is This What Equality Looks Like?

How Assimilation Marginalizes the Dutch LGBT Community
Article

Abstract

Using the Netherlands as a case study, this article explores how increased social acceptance of and legal protections for gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people impact their lives. The author draws on in-depth interviews with nine LGBT people to argue that the danger of acceptance is invisibility for those who assimilate and marginalization for those who do not conform to assimilationist discourses, such as transgender individuals and other gender nonconformers. Utilizing Butler’s theories of normalization and Goffman’s theories of stigmatization, the findings also show that assimilating into homonormativity can generate feelings of shame and fear. The author concludes that new approaches in dismantling heteronormativity and seeking equality are needed in order to achieve genuine acceptance for LGBT people.

Keywords

LGBT Homonormativity Heteronormativity Gender nonconformity Normalization Stigmatization 

References

  1. Ahmed, S. (2006). Orientations: toward a queer phenomenology. GLQ, 12, 543–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brandzel, A. L. (2005). Queering citizenship?: same-sex marriage and the state. GLQ, 11, 171–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buijs, B., Hekma, B., & Duyvendak, W. D. (2011). ‘As Long as They Keep Away From Me’: the paradox of antigay violence in a gay-friendly country. Sexualities, 14(6), 632–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Butler, J. (2008). Sexual politics, torture, and secular time. The British Journal of Sociology, 59(1), 1–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chambliss, D. F., & Shut, R. K. (2006). Making sense of the social world: methods of investigation (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge.Google Scholar
  7. Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dalton, H. L. (1991). Reflections on the lesbian and gay marriage debate. Law & Sexuality, 1, 1–8.Google Scholar
  9. Duggan, L. (2003). The Twilight of Equality? Neoliberalism, Cultural Politics, and the Attack on Democracy. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  10. Duyvendak, J. W. (1996). The depoliticization of the Dutch gay identity, or why Dutch gays aren’t queer. In S. Seidman (Ed.), Queer Theory/Sociology (pp. 421–438). Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: the University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Fassin, E. (2001). Same sex, different politics: “Gay marriage debates in France and the United States”. Public Culture, 13(2), 215–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gamson, J. (2000). Sexualities, queer theory, and qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research: theories and issues (pp. 347–365). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Gerhards, J. (2010). Non-discrimination towards homosexuality: the European Union’s policy and citizens’ attitudes towards homosexuality in 27 European countries. International Sociology, 25(1), 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: notes on the management of spoiled identity. New York: Simon & Schuster, Inc.Google Scholar
  16. Goldman, J. (2009). Homomonument. GLBTQ: an encyclopedia of gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and queer culture. Chicago: GLBTQ, Inc.Google Scholar
  17. Haritaworn, J. (2008). Loyal repetitions of the nation: gay assimilation and the “War on terror.” DarkMatter, 3.Google Scholar
  18. Hekma, G. (1998). ‘As long as they don’t make an issue of it…’: gay men and lesbians in organized sports in the Netherlands. Journal of Homosexuality, 35, 1–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hekma, G. (2002). Imams and homosexuality: a post-gay debate in the Netherlands. Sexualities, 5(2), 237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hekma, G. (2004). Queer: the Dutch case. GLQ, 10, 276–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hekma, G. (2005). How libertine is the Netherlands? Exploring contemporary Dutch sexual cultures. In E. Bernstein & L. Schaffner (Eds.), Regulating sex: the politics of intimacy and identity (pp. 209–224). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Hekma, G. (2006). The demise of gay and lesbian radicalism in the Netherlands. In M. Chateauvert (Ed.), New social movements & sexuality: conference papers 2004. Sofia: Bilitis Resource Center.Google Scholar
  23. Hequembourq, A., & Arditi, J. (1999). Fractured Resistances: The Debate over assimilationism among gays and lesbians in the United States. The Sociological Quarterly, 40(4), 663–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ingraham, C. (1996). The heterosexual imaginary: feminist sociology and theories of gender. In S. Seidman (Ed.), Queer theory/sociology (pp. 168–193). Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  25. Jagose, A. (1996). Queer Theory. Washington Square: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Keuzenkamp, S. Bos, D. Adolfsen, A. Duyvendak, J. W. & Hekma, G. (2007). Out in the Netherlands: acceptance of homosexuality in the Netherlands. The Netherlands Institute for Social Research. Google Scholar
  27. Keuzenkamp, S. (2011). Acceptance of homosexuality in the Netherlands 2011: international comparison, trends, and current situation. The Netherlands Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  28. Lorde, A. (1984). Sister outsider. Berkeley: Ten Speed.Google Scholar
  29. Lubbers, M., Jaspers, E., & Ultee, W. (2009). Primary and secondary socialization impacts on support for same-sex marriage after legalization in the Netherlands. Journal of Family Issues, 30, 1714–1745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mepscehn, P., Duyvendark, J. W., & Tonkens, E. H. (2010). Sexual politics, orientalism and multicultural citizenship in the Netherlands. Sociology, 44(5), 962–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Oswin, N. (2007). Producing homonormativity in neoliberal South Africa: recognition, redistribution, and the equality project. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture & Society, 32, 649–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Puar, J. K., & Rai, A. (2002). Monster, terrorist, fag: the war on terrorism and the production of docile patriots. Social Text, 20(3), 117–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Puar, J. K. (2007). Terrorist assemblages: homonationalism in queer times. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Stone, A. L. (2010). Diversity, dissent, and decision making: the challenge to LGBT politics. GLQ, 16, 465–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stryker, S. (2008). Transgender history, homonormativity, and disciplinarity. Radical History Review, 100, 145–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sullivan, N. (2003). A critical introduction to queer theory. Washington Square: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Taylor, S. J., & Bogdan, R. (1998). In-depth interviewing. In Introduction to qualitative research methods: a guidebook and resource (3rd ed., pp. 87–116). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  38. Valentine, D. (2007). Imagining transgender: an ethnography of a category. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Valocchi, S. (2005). Not yet queer enough: the lessons of queer theory for the sociology of gender and sexuality. Gender and Society, 19, 750–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vitulli, E. (2010). A defining moment in civil rights history? The employment non-discrimination act, trans-inclusion, and homonormativity. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 7, 155–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Warner, M. (1999). The trouble with normal: sex, politics and the ethics of queer life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Weeks, J. (2008). Regulation, resistance, recognition. Sexualities, 11, 787–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Williams, C. L., Giuffre, P. A., & Dellinger, K. (2009). The gay-friendly closet. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 6, 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wolfson, E. (2004). Why marriage matters: America, equality, and gay people’s right to marry. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations